Safety and Efficacy of dRug-ElutiNg beADs Trans-arterial chemoEmbolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan (SERENADE-T)

September 13, 2017 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Safety and Efficacy of dRug-ElutiNg beADs Trans-arterial chemoEmbolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan (SERENADE-T)

To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of DC bead® TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To evaluate efficacy and safety profile of DC bead TACE in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in Taiwan.

This is a multi-center, retrospective, single arm study to explore safety and efficacy of DC bead TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Taiwan

Retrospective analysis of medical records of all patients who underwent DC Bead TACE at National Taiwan University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2010-2017/7.

All statistical data were analyzed with SPSS software (SPSS, IBM North America, New York, NY, USA). Demographic and baseline lab data are presented by using descriptive statistics Student's t-test. Survival analysis will includes all patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical records of all patients who underwent DC bead TACE at National Taiwan University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2010-2017/7

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of HCC, according to the AASLD diagnosis criteria for HCC.
  • Patient received DC bead TACE.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with current any other cancer except non-melanomatous skin cancer.
  • Infiltrative HCC
  • Patients received ≥2 consecutive sessions of TACE (≥2 TACE at the same admission, no matter it is cTACE or DC bead TACE)
  • Patients received DC bead TACE and simultaneously received other therapy, such as radiotherapy, sorafenib etc.
  • Presence of collateral vessel pathways potentially endangering normal territories during embolization.
  • Presence of arteries supplying the lesion not large enough to accept DC Bead® microspheres.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patient records
Medical records of all patients who underwent DC bead TACE.
Retrospective analysis of medical records of all patients who underwent DC Bead TACE at National Taiwan University Hospital, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, and Taichung Veterans General Hospital from 2010-2017/7

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the DC bead TACE
Time Frame: One year.
Safety of the DC bead TACE is evaluated based on the incidence of Grade 3 and Grade 4 toxicities up to 8 weeks following the procedure according to National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for adverse events (CTCAE Version 4.03).
One year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumor response
Time Frame: One year.
Tumor response is assessed on triphase CT or contrast-enhanced MR study according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria.
One year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-resectable

Clinical Trials on Patient records

3
Subscribe