Comparing the Clinical Outcomes of DermACELL® With Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix

March 9, 2020 updated by: Christopher Attinger, M.D., Georgetown University

A Randomized, Prospective Trial Comparing the Clinical Outcomes for DermACELL® Compared With Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix

Both DermACELL® and Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix are indicated for deep soft tissue coverage and serve as a biological matrix for cellular migration. The current thinking about the utility of these products is to apply over the wound surface and wait until the graft is well vascularized (granular bed/neodermis). At that point a split thickness skin graft can be applied over this area to cover and heal the wound. This study will determine whether human allograft or xenograft will create a durable neodermis that is more supportive of accepting of a split thickness skin graft. Patients who do not receive Split thickness skin grafts will be assigned to the second cohort for observation of healing rates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, randomized, single site, clinical research trial comparing the clinical outcomes of DermACELL® compared with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix in dermal regeneration. A total of 100 subjects will be randomized into either the DermACELL® (n=50) or Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix (n=50) treatment group. An interim analysis will be performed when both groups have enrolled 25 subjects. Subjects will receive either DermACELL® or Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix in the operating room for coverage of deep soft tissue defects in the lower extremity. Subjects will then be followed in the outpatient clinic. Once the neodermis has been sufficiently generated, a split thickness skin graft (autograft or allograft) will be applied in the operating room. The split thickness skin graft application site will be then followed to observe viability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

53

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20007
        • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 88 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. male or female 18-90
  2. who have a complex soft tissue defect that extends below subcutaneous tissue (exposed fascia, ligament, tendon, muscle, or bone)
  3. wounds that are either acute or chronic (nonhealing wounds greater than 4 weeks but not greater than 2 years in duration)
  4. wounds not amendable to primary closure as deemed by the surgeon
  5. wounds that have been deemed by the surgeon that any residual infection has been or is being treated upon entry into the clinical trial
  6. requiring operative application of a dermoconductive agent
  7. extremity wounds have adequate perfusion determined by: palpable pedal pulses, dopplerable pulses, ankle brachial index of >0.7, or transcutaneous oximetry of >0.5
  8. renally stable (i.e. CR<3.0, BUN>9.0, eGFR >60)
  9. is able to comply to clinical trial requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. with a contraindication for the application of a xenograft or allograft
  2. untreated infection of soft tissue or bone
  3. untreated autoimmune connective tissue disorders
  4. body mass index of ≥ 50
  5. undergoing chemotherapy/radiation therapy
  6. malignancy
  7. active liver disease (e.g. hepatitis A-G),
  8. previous wound care therapy that included any bioengineered alternative tissue or STSG 30 days prior to enrollment
  9. pregnancy
  10. enrolled in any other interventional clinical research trial
  11. unable or unwilling to comply with study requirements

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Integra®
Integra® is a bilayer wound matrix made out of bovine tissue.
Integra® is a bilayer wound matrix made out of bovine tissue and is applied to the wound in standard of care fashion.
Experimental: DermACELL®
DermACELL® is a bilayer wound matrix made out of human tissue.
DermACELL® is a bilayer wound matrix made out of human tissue and is applied to the wound in standard of care fashion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time the wound bed takes to heal for split thickness skin graft application
Time Frame: 160 days
Time (days) required for wound bed preparation (granular bed) for the application of a split thickness skin graft (autograft or allograft) after placement of DermACELL® as compared with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix.
160 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of subjects with complete split thickness skin graft take
Time Frame: 30 days
The percent of subjects with complete split thickness skin graft (autograft or allograft) take utilizing DermACELL® as compared with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix 30 days after split thickness skin graft application.
30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of split thickness skin graft take for wound
Time Frame: 30 days
The percent of split thickness skin graft (autograft or allograft) take for a wound that receives DermACELL® as compared with Integra® Bilayer Wound Matrix 30 days after split thickness skin graft application.
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher Attinger, MD, Georgetown University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 18, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2014-0061

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wounds

Clinical Trials on Integra®

3
Subscribe