Negative-Positive Valence Domains in Anxiety and Depression (RDoC)

October 9, 2017 updated by: Martin Paulus, University of California, San Diego

Latent Constructs: Negative-Positive Valence Domains in Anxiety and Depression

Anxiety and depression are highly prevalent and disabling conditions that frequently co-occur, and are costly to the individual and society. Despite important advances in our understanding of these disorders, there is a significant unmet need to identify reliable and clinically useful tests that can predict prognosis, inform treatment choice for a given individual, and improve treatment outcomes. The aim of this project is to fill this critical gap by validating a battery of measures including brain imaging, psychophysiology, behavior, and self-report that will reliably assess positive and negative affect, or valence, system functioning in a broad sample of individuals screened for anxiety and depression as part of their routine primary care visits.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Participants presenting to the UCSD and UCLA primary care clinics will be screened as part of their routine visit using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7). Participants who call in will be asked to provide verbal informed consent for phone screening and the IRB approved Screening Questionnaire and the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) will be administered.

Participants who remain eligible after the phone screening will be asked to return for a Clinical Interview, Behavioral Session, Biomarker blood draw, (and optional genetics), and Neuroimaging Session.

All participants will be contacted approximately 3-months later and invited to complete the same battery of self-report measures completed during the baseline session (described below). The self-report measures will be administered through a secure on-line survey database. This data will allow investigators to (1) confirm that participants continue to meet initial eligibility criteria and are therefore eligible for the full re-test battery and (2) use baseline measures of positive and negative valence domains to predict changes in symptoms and functioning.

A subset of 50 participants (n=25 from each UCSD and UCLA) will be randomly selected to return approximately three months later to complete the same battery of assessments in the Behavioral and Neuroimaging Sessions to establish test-retest reliability of the latent constructs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

248

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093-0855
        • UCSD Psychiatry Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Investigators opted to identify individuals with anxiety or depression in a primary care setting, which investigators have used successfully to recruit a significant number of subjects, to maximize generalizability and external validity.

Description

  1. Positive for anxiety and/or depressive symptoms.
  2. Score on the PHQ-9 and OASIS.
  3. Between the ages of 18-55, inclusive.
  4. Have signed informed consent document(s) indicating that participant understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and willing to participate in the study.
  5. Have sufficient proficiency in English language to understand and complete interviews, questionnaires, and all other study procedures.
  6. Have telephone or easy access to telephone.
  7. History of brain injury with evidence of neurological deficits, neurological disorders, or severe or unstable medical conditions that might be compromised by participation in the study (to be determined by primary care provider).
  8. Current and regular use of a medication that could affect brain functioning.
  9. Must not have MRI contraindications such as: cardiac pacemaker, metal fragments in eyes/skin/body (shrapnel), aortic/aneurysm clips, prosthesis, by-pass surgery/coronary artery clips, hearing aid, heart valve replacement, shunt (ventricular or spinal), electrodes, metal plates/pins/screws/wires, or neuro/bio-stimulators (TENS unit), persons who have ever been a metal worker/welder, history of eye surgery/eyes washed out because of metal, inability to lie still on one's back for 60 minutes; prior neurosurgery; tattoos with metal dyes, unwillingness to remove body piercings, and pregnancy.
  10. Intact or correctable vision and hearing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Anxiety
elevated anxiety (as indicated by a GAD-7 score of 8 or higher)
standard anatomical and functional imaging
Hear rate, Vagal Tone, Skin Conductance, and Startle Reflex Electromyogram
Depression
elevated anxiety (as indicated by a GAD-7 score of 8 or higher)
standard anatomical and functional imaging
Hear rate, Vagal Tone, Skin Conductance, and Startle Reflex Electromyogram

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship of latent constructs of positive and negative valence domains and neural indices of reward sensitivity and fear conditioning in treatment seeking depressed and anxious individuals.
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of BOLD % signal difference in brain regions of interest during reward or loss trials for anticipation and outcome phases in a reward paradigm, and conditioning trials in a fear conditioning paradigm.
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin P Paulus, MD, UC San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: Murray B Stein, MD, MPH, UC San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 30, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 9, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 130554

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on NeuroImaging

3
Subscribe