Airway Inflammatory Profile Among Cleaning Workers From Different Workplaces

March 28, 2018 updated by: Beatriz Mangueira Saraiva Romanholo, University of Sao Paulo
There are consistent evidences through epidemiologic studies in different places, reinforced by occupational asthma records studies, that cleaning workers have a high risk in developing asthma. These risk determinants are not totally known. The air around the worker may have some higher and lower molecular weight with different concentration peaks from removed dust of the cleaning process and volatile substances from cleaning products. Cleaning activities may occur in different places. Although the relationship between rhinitis and asthma is already established, there are not many studies about occupational rhinitis-related work place. This study aimed to investigate airway inflammation and respiratory symptoms of cleaning workers from different workplaces.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Were recruited to participate in the study individuals from four different workplaces: Hospital; University; Housekeeper and Control (office workers). The research was performed in Cacoal city, Rondonia, Brazil. Smokers (active), pregnant, lactating, and individuals at continuing therapy for treating disorders of the airways were excluded.

Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees evaluation were performed using the European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module.

Nasal swab was collected for evaluation of upper airways inflammation, according to Ronchetti et al protocol, using a sterile swab that was moistened with 1mL saline solution; both nostrils were scraped using this swab. Twenty minutes after this, laminas were stained using May-Grunwald-Giemsa to eosinophils, neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages and epithelial cells identification. Cells were analyzed using a Nikon E600 optical microscope (Nikon, Canada), of 1.000 x magnitude. Whenever possible a total of 200 cells were counted in two slides.

Statistical analysis were performed using Anova variance (Kruskal-Wallis) and Dunn's test for comparisons between groups. To evaluate the association between the qualitative variables we used the chi-square, Statistical software Sigma Plot 12.0 and SPSS 21.0. The confidence interval was 95% (p <0.05).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

167

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sao Paulo
      • São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 01246903
        • Children's Institute of the Clinical Hospital of University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cleaning workers from different workplaces
  • Non-cleaning workers (control group)
  • People legally capable (over 18 years old)
  • Must be able to nasal swab collection and answer questionnaires
  • Sign the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smokers (active)
  • Pregnant (women)
  • Lactating (women)
  • Not accept the informed consent form
  • Individuals at continuing therapy for airways treating disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hospital
Hospital cleaning workers Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation.
Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Experimental: University
Campus (university) cleaning workers Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation.
Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Experimental: Housekeeper
Housemaid (cleaning workers) Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation.
Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Experimental: Control
Office workers (no relationship to cleaning) Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation. Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.
Nasal swab was collect to upper airways inflammation evaluation.
Clinical profile and respiratory symptoms employees' evaluation were performed using specific questionnaires (European Community Respiratory Health Survey for occupational diseases evaluation (ECRHS), (adapted by Ribeiro et al, 2007) and the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) - Asthma module, previously translated and validated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure of respiratory symptoms
Time Frame: One day
Questionnaires to analyze respiratory symptons
One day
Cell differentiation for the evaluation of nasal epithelial inflammation
Time Frame: One day
Nasal swab will be collected to analyze cell differentiation
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: BEATRIZ BS Mangueira Saraiva-Romanholo, PhD, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo
  • Study Chair: Edineia R Paz, Master, Instituto de Assistencia Medica ao Servidor Publico Estadual, Sao Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Study Data/Documents

  1. Informed Consent Form
    Information identifier: Sistema Nacional de Informação

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on Nasal swab

3
Subscribe