The Effect of Visual Feedback on Function, Stability and Quality of Life in Transtibial Amputation

October 19, 2017 updated by: Elif Kırdı, Hacettepe University

Investigation of the Effect of Visual Feedback on Function, Stability and Quality of Life in Individuals With Transtibial Amputation

This study was conducted to examine the effect of visual feedback on function, stability and quality of life in transtibial amputees. A total of 24 subjects who had unilateral transtibial amputations, used prosthesis with total surface bearing socket (TSB) for at least 1 year and volunteered to participate in the study were included. Before and after Treatment subjects were evaluated with "LASAR Posture" for prosthetic weight bearing (PWB), "Berg Balance Scale (BBS)" and "Timed Up& Go Test (TUG)" for balance and functional mobility, "2-Minute-Walk-Test (2MWT)" for physical performance, "Satisfaction with the Prosthesis Questionnaire (SATPRO)" for prosthetic pleasure and "Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)" for health- related quality of life. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups as study and control groups. After the evaluations the same exercises; PWB exercises, balance exercises, anteroposterior and lateral weight shifting, obstacle course, walking on different grounds were applied to the the study group with visual feedback methods and control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. had transtibial amputation
  2. >18 years old
  3. had total surface bearing socket at least one year

Outcome measures:

  • Prosthetic weight bearing
  • Berg Balance Scale
  • Timed up &go Test
  • 2 Minute Walk Test
  • Satisfaction of prosthesis questionnare
  • Nottingham health profile

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Hacettepe University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • had unilateral transtibial amputations,
  • used prosthesis with total surface bearing socket (TSB) for at least 1 year
  • volunteered to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • had any neurological disorders
  • had any cognitive problems

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: visual feedback
participants in the experimental group were applied usual prosthetic rehabilitation with visual feedback methods. 9 sessions for three days were applied.
in the study group, subjects were applied for example prosthetic weight bearing exercises in front of the mirror. They watched their reflected image while doing exercises.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Usual prosthetic rehabilitation
participants in the control group were applied usual prosthetic rehabilitation. 9 sessions for three days were applied.
prosthetic weight bearing and balance exercises were applied to the control group for 9 sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prosthetic Weight bearing
Time Frame: 3 minutes

minimal (Min WB) and maximal (Max WB) values were visually recorded on the amputated side for three consecutive minutes.

The average weight bearing on the amputated side (Ml) was calculated by dividing the sum of maximal and minimal weight bearing values by two.

The percentage of total body weight (TBW) borne through the amputated limb was then determined using the formula:

(Ml/TBW) x 100

3 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elif Kırdı, Hacettepe University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 25, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 12, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 18, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GO 17 / 115

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Amputation

Clinical Trials on visual feedback

3
Subscribe