Localized Neuropathic Pain: Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment (PELICAN)

April 27, 2021 updated by: Davina Wildemeersch, University Hospital, Antwerp

Safety, Efficacy and Patient Acceptability of Topical Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment: a Randomized, Multicentre, Comparative Pragmatic Trial in Adult Patients Suffering From Diverse Localized Neuropathic Pain (LNP) Syndromes

Evaluation of topical treatment with lidocaine 5% patch (daily administration) or capsaicin 8% patch (periodic administration - upon reoccurrence of pain symptoms) in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) across a wide variety of etiologies, with a duration between 1 and 24 months (subacute to chronic neuropathic pain (NP)).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A multicentre, randomized, open-label comparative trial evaluating topical treatment options versus oral systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain (LNP) syndromes. A wide variety of peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes will be included such as post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), post-surgical NP/post-traumatic NP/scar pain, post-amputation NP, post-radiation therapy NP, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) type 1. In contrast to most (or even all) commercial clinical studies we will not limit the inclusion to one or two distinct neuropathic pain syndromes such as post-herpetic neuralgia (inclusion based on etiology of the neuropathic syndrome). In this pragmatic trial we will however include all patients suffering from a clinical neuropathic syndrome with distinct clinical features such as hyperalgesia/allodynia, presence of spontaneous positive sensory phenomena and lasting for more than 3 months without making any exclusion based on etiology. Initial pain intensity indicates the presence of either moderate or severe pain in these adult patients (NRS 4/10).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2018
        • AZ Monica (campus Antwerpen)
      • Brasschaat, Belgium, 2930
        • AZ Klina
      • Brugge, Belgium, 8000
        • AZ Sint Jan Brugge
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • UVC Brugmann
      • Charleroi, Belgium, 6000
        • Grand Hôpital de Charleroi
      • Genk, Belgium, 3600
        • Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (ZOL
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent (UZG)
      • Jette, Belgium, 1090
        • UZ Brussel
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (UZL)
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • Hopital Universitaire Sart Tilman de Liège (ULg) (CHU)
      • Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
        • AZ Delta
      • Turnhout, Belgium, 2300
        • AZ Turnhout
    • Antwerp
      • Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium, 2650
        • University Hospital Antwerp

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Patients eligible for inclusion in this study must fulfil all of the following criteria:

  • Subjects should be capable of giving their informed consent with sufficient knowledge of the Dutch, French or German language;
  • Males and females, 18 years and older;
  • Be assessed as suffering from moderate to severe neuropathic pain across the screening process with pain intensity (numeric rating scale - NRS) ≥ 4/10,
  • At the time of screening pain symptoms have to be present for at least one (1) month, with a maximum of 24 months;
  • Sensory disturbances present in the skin area of maximal pain;
  • At the time of screening pain is clearly related to the presence of a localized neuropathic pain syndrome.
  • Male or female patients of child producing potential* must agree to use contraception or take measures to avoid pregnancy during the study and until after the final treatment;
  • Women can only be included after negative pregnancy test;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18;
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women;
  • Infection in the painful skin region;
  • Poorly healed or non-healed wound or scar in the painful skin region as well as presence of cutaneous abnormalities (non-intact skin barrier) within the painful skin region related to dermatological conditions;
  • Known and/or strong suspicion of allergy to the study medication, known skin disorder (resulting in disruption of the normal skin barrier);
  • Previous treatment with any of the three medications included in the study protocol for the same painful area within the last 12 months at the time of screening;
  • Risk of heart failure and/or renal failure.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lidocaine patch 5%
Lidocaine 5% medicated plasters will be applied daily, during 12 consecutive hours.
Application of Lidocaine 5% patch for 12 hours.
Experimental: Capsaicin 8% patch
Capsaicin 8% patches need to applied in a hospital setting during 1 hour. Re-application of these capsaicin patches will be performed upon re-occurrence of painful symptoms (mostly after 12 weeks - so not after a fixed time interval). Application of capsaicin patches will be carried out in a hospital setting (+/- 3 hours procedure).
Application of Capsaicin 8% patch for
Active Comparator: Pregabaline
Oral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe. In European clinical practice, up-titration of the dose is often carried out over a longer time-period. This study thus includes up-titration schedule for pregabalin over a period of 4 weeks. If patients develop side-effects during the intake/uptitration of pregabalin this treatment can be stopped and switched to gabapentin (300mg capsules). Gabapentin will always be the back-up treatment for failed systematic treatment with pregabalin. Dose of gabapentin will be uptitrated to maximum 1200mg per day.
Oral treatment with pregabalin (75mg capsules) will be used at optimized doses to best match clinical practice in Europe.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life questionnaire
Time Frame: 24 months
To determine if topical treatment significantly improves health-related quality of life compared to systemic treatment in adult patients suffering from localized neuropathic pain across a wide variety of etiologies (LNP), with a duration between 1 and 24 months.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain relief
Time Frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Reduction in pain intensity (PI-NRS), time to worsening of the pain (PI-NRS and NPSI) and use of rescue medication (MSQ III-R)
from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
AUC for EQ-5D-5L measurements, global perceived effect (GPE), effect on mood (HADS), quality of sleep (NRS and ISI).
from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Drug tolerance
Time Frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Percentage of patients without systemic drug related side effects, percentage of patients who discontinue the study drug.
from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Functional status of the patient
Time Frame: from week 0 up to 26 weeks
Impact of pain on functioning (Interference - BPI), participation in activities (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI).
from week 0 up to 26 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guy Hans, MD, PhD, University Hospital, Antwerp

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine patch 5%

3
Subscribe