- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03357705
Effectiveness in Limiting the Need to Elevate the Maxillary Sinus (SO-GHI)
Effectiveness of Different Alveolar Preservation Procedures in the Upper Molar Zone in Limiting the Need to Elevate the Maxillary Sinus to Allow the Placement of Dental Implants: a Prospective Cohort Multicentre Clinical Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Bone resorption and contraction of bone volumes are physiologically occurring after the extraction of any dental element. This reabsorption of the alveolar process results in a reduction in the size of the alveolar crest both in width and in height. Numerous studies have attempted to quantify the size and timing of contraction of bone volumes after a dental flotation. The data reported in the literature show an average horizontal reduction of about 2.5 mm, which appears more marked by the vestibular side than the palatal one. The vertical contraction of the crest is estimated at 25-30%, with bone loss of 1-2 mm and a soft contraction of soft tissues of about 2 mm. In the area of the first and second upper molars, however, the total contraction of the alveoli is greater because the residual crest at the insertion of the implant would have undergone a double reduction, namely from the coronal side with the mechanisms just indicated, but also from the apex , for maxillary sinus pneumonia due to the absence of dental element6. For this reason, insertion of an implant in this area may be difficult due to an inadequate height of the remaining bone, which necessitates a bone regeneration procedure, ie a maxillary sinus elevation. This procedure allows you to regain the abdominal apex lost and the insertion of adequate lengths. In the presence of satisfactory residual bone height, maxillary sinus breast can be performed crestally, while in more markedly atrophic cases, especially in the presence of anatomically wide breasts, a side-by-side approach is preferable.
Various grafting materials have been used to perform alveolar retention with the aim of limiting the contraction of bone volumes and improving bone formation: autologous bone, homologous bone and bone substitutes of heterologous origin or alloplastic.
The use of autologous bone in alveolar preservation was soon abandoned for bone marrow morbidity, especially when deciding to use a donor site other than the extraction area. The homologous bone, although showing excellent results, is still to date problematic use in Italy. The heterologous grafts have been widely used for alveolar preservation; however, especially if bovine bone is used, significant percentages of graft (up to 25%) are histologically observable at 9 months from graft.
For these reasons, in this study it was decided to use as a graft in Group A a synthetic material (nanocrystalline synthetic hydroxyapatite) and in group B a collagen of bovine origin.
Bovine collagen, while having reduced dimensional stability over time, has the advantage of contributing to stabilizing the clot, an essential basis for bone healing, and is completely replaced by newly formed tissue in a short time. Synthetic hydroxyapatite, used as a biomaterial, has shown ability to stimulate osteoconduction and is slowly but completely replaced over time by newly formed bone, thus providing a great capacity for maintaining volumes.
Moreover, nanostructured porous hydroxyapatite appear to favor adhesion of bone matrix proteins and promote differentiation of osteogenetic cells. Although the nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite in a silica gel matrix has already been successfully tested as a clotting material in the maxillary sinus, the behavior of pure sintered nano-hydroxyapatite granules has not yet been evaluated in terms of osteoconductive potential and dimensional stability in time at post-mining sites.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Parma, Italy, 43100
- Piezosurgery Academy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- indication for extraction of the first or second upper molar, based on a thorough diagnosis and treatment plan;
- "three-rooted" anatomy of the first or second upper molar to be extracted so that it can have an inter-radicular septum that allows a precise measurement of the height of the bone ridge from the septum itself and from the walls of the 3 alveoli to the floor of the maxillary sinus;
- Extraction of intercalate molar or last arch element;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anatomy of the molar with unique root or fused roots
- contextual extraction of the molar and one or more contiguous elements
- apical lesions with a diameter of> 3 mm or cystic lesions with respect to the element to be extracted
- root fracture which has produced resorption or bone fenestration
1) acute myocardial infarction in the last six months; 2) uncontrolled clotting disorders; 3) uncontrolled diabetes (HBA1c> 7.5%); 4) radiotherapy in the head / neck district for the last 24 months; 5) immunocompromise (eg HIV infection or chemotherapy over the last 3 years); 6) treatment in progress or with bisphosphonates via e.v .; 7) autoimmune diseases in chronic therapy with methotrexate or other immunosuppressive drugs; 8) allergy to bovine collagen; 9) psychological or psychiatric problems; 10) abuse of alcohol or drug use; 11) uncontrolled periodontal disease;
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: synthetic
alveolar ridge preservation with synthetic bone
|
after tooth extraction
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: collagen
alveolar ridge preservation with bovine collagen
|
after tooth extraction
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
radiographic distance between crestal bone and implant platform
Time Frame: 6 months after surgery
|
necessity of sinus floor regeneration
|
6 months after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Claudio Stacchi, Dr, Piezosurgery Academy
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Carlsson GE, Bergman B, Hedegard B. Changes in contour of the maxillary alveolar process under immediate dentures. A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Acta Odontol Scand. 1967 Jun;25(1):45-75. doi: 10.3109/00016356709072522. No abstract available.
- Sharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization following extractions: a radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Jan-Feb;23(1):48-56.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SO-GHI
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alveolar Bone Loss
-
Alexandria UniversityLehigh UniversityCompletedBone Loss | Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss | Vertical Alveolar Bone LossEgypt
-
Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande...KU Leuven; ITI International Team for Implantology, Switzerland; Rio Grande do...Not yet recruitingAlveolar Bone Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Grafting Bone | Alveolar Bone Atrophy | Bone Loss, OsteoclasticBrazil
-
Universidad de MurciaUnknownTooth Loss | Bone Loss, Alveolar | Bone Atrophy, AlveolarSpain
-
Università degli Studi di FerraraAzienda USL FerraraRecruitingBone Loss, Alveolar | Dehiscence | Alveolar Ridge EnlargementItaly
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakNot yet recruitingBone Loss, AlveolarIndia
-
University of MichiganActive, not recruiting
-
Rio de Janeiro State UniversityCompleted
-
Semmelweis UniversityPurgo Biologics Inc.; FORM-LabCompletedBone Augmentation | Bone Loss, AlveolarHungary
-
Esraa Salem KamalRecruiting
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
Clinical Trials on alveolar ridge preservation with synthetic bone
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...RecruitingAlveolar Bone ResorptionChina
-
University of BelgradeCompleted
-
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and...Not yet recruitingDental Implants | Bone Regeneration | Tooth Extraction
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of Campinas, BrazilUnknownAlveolar Ridge Preservation | Connective TissueBrazil
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensCompleted
-
Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleOsteology FoundationCompletedAlveolar Ridge Preservation | Immediate Implant Placement | Post-Extraction SocketItaly
-
The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School...Recruiting
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...Completed