Air Dissection in Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of T1a Renal Cell Carcinoma

January 9, 2018 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
The investigators aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using ambient air to protect against thermal injury during RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) based on data from cases at their institute.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been increasing, particularly among patients >65 years of age. As older individuals are at higher risk for surgical complications, the use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for small renal masses (SRM) <4 cm in size, which include T1a tumors,may be a compelling treatment option for elderly patients. However, RFA uses heat to destroy abnormal tissue, with the risk of thermal injury to tissues and organs, including gastric tissue and nerve roots, which are in proximity to the targeted treatment zone. The incidence rate of major complication with RFA, including thermal wounds, has been reported to vary between 3.2% and 5.2%. Different thermal protection methods have been developed to lower the risk of injury to adjacent tissues during ablation, such as air dissection using CO2 injection and hydrodissection using G5% for shielding. Although both of these options are effective, they are expensive. To lower the cost of thermal protection, the investigators have been using ambient air instead of CO2 for air dissection prior to RFA for SRM-RCCs.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study cohort is selected from our institution. Patients with a single SRM of <4 cm, confirmed as RCC on biopsy, are offered RFA as an alternative to open resection. In cases in which vital tissues are located within 10 mm of the target treatment area, air dissection are planned if the patient provide his consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
  • Patients with a single SRM of <4 cm, confirmed as RCC on biopsy
  • RCC status : pT1a
  • Eligible patients for an RadioFrequency Ablation (RFA) treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have already received a RFA treatment for an other tissu or tumor
  • Patients who have a bleeding tumor or prior local treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group 1
RFA without air dissection protection
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which part of the electrical conduction system of the tumor is ablated using the heat generated from medium frequency alternating current.
Group 2
RFA with air dissection protection
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a medical procedure in which part of the electrical conduction system of the tumor is ablated using the heat generated from medium frequency alternating current.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure rate of the air dissection procedure
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
The failure rate of the air dissection procedure is defined as the need for another dissection method, the inability to create sufficient space for successful dissection and/or damage to surrounding vital tissues.
6 weeks post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative complications
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-operative
Minor and major complications are recorded, corresponding to Clavien Dindo classification
6 weeks post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Submission at several congress: WCE2016, EAU2017, AUA2017 Publication at the Journal of Urology in December 2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Unrecognized Condition

Clinical Trials on RFA

3
Subscribe