DARTS I: Feasibility, Safety, and Performance Trial (DARTS I)

February 14, 2024 updated by: Ascyrus Medical LLC.

Dissected Aorta Repair Through Stent Implantation (DARTS): A Feasibility, Safety and Performance Trial

The objective of this study is to investigate the feasibility and clinical benefits of the AMDS to treat patients with acute DeBakey type I dissections and/or intramural hematomas (IMH) involving the ascending aorta and aortic arch through open surgical repair.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

AMDS is designed to complement the replacement of the ascending aorta with conventional surgical technique utilizing a conventional polyester graft. AMDS is constructed of an uncovered Nitinol wire braided stent attached proximally to a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) felt graft component. The PFTE felt graft component excludes the FL at the distal aortic anastomosis and the wire stent re-expands the dissection flap within the arch and descending aorta, which aims to treat malperfusion and promote positive remodeling of the aorta.

The DARTS I Feasibility, Safety and Performance trial is a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, single-arm, multi-institutional Canadian study evaluating the feasibility and safety of the AMDS graft. A goal of 30 subjects will be enrolled at 1 site in Germany.

The enrollment period will span a minimum of 3 months from Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and site activation. Candidates for this study are adults who require repair of an acute DeBakey type I aorta dissection and/or intramural hematoma (IMH). Patients will be consented pre-operatively and enrolled patients will be followed for approximately 5 years after their AMDS implantation date. Data will be collected at 10 time points: baseline (pre-operatively), discharge, 1 month post-operatively, 3 months post-operatively, and 6 months post-operatively, 1 year post-operatively and thereafter, annually, for a total of 5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Deutsches Hertzzentrum Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Informed Consent obtained
  2. ≥18 years of age or ≤80 years of age (male or female)

    Subject must have one of the following diagnosed, based on CT angiography, within 0-14 days:

  3. Acute DeBakey I dissection or
  4. Acute DeBakey I intramural hematoma (IMH)

Exclusion Criteria:

General Exclusion Criteria

Patients must be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are true:

  1. Less than 18 years of age or over 80 years of age
  2. Life expectancy less than 2 years
  3. Pregnant or breastfeeding or planning on becoming pregnant within 60 months
  4. Unwilling to comply with the follow-up schedule
  5. Refusal to give informed consent
  6. Institutionalized individualized due to administrative or judicial order
  7. Individuals with a dependent relationship to the sponsor or investigator

Medical Exclusion Criteria

Patients must be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are true:

  1. Uncontrolled systemic infection
  2. Uncontrollable anaphylaxis to iodinated contrast
  3. Known allergy(ies) to Nitinol and/or PTFE
  4. Patient in extreme hemodynamic compromise requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  5. Inability to obtain CT angiograms for follow-up
  6. Previously diagnosed with Marfan syndrome, Loeys- Dietz syndrome or Ehlers- Danlos syndrome with confirmed laboratory genetic testing on a date prior to the diagnosis of the dissection

Anatomical Exclusion Criteria

  1. Any pathology of mycotic origin
  2. Subacute or chronic dissection of the ascending aorta and aortic arch (>14 days after the index event)
  3. Aortic fistulous communication with non-vascular structure (e.g. esophagus, bronchial)
  4. Extensive thrombus or calcifications in the aortic arch as defined by CT angiography
  5. Excessive tortuosity precluding safe passage of the AMDS as defined by CT angiography
  6. Descending thoracic aneurysm involving the proximal third (1/3) of the descending aorta and measuring > 45mm in diameter
  7. Aortic arch aneurysm > 45mm in diameter

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: AMDS Implantation
AMDS implantation is performed during an open chest procedure for intervention of aortic dissection repair.
The device will be implanted during an already planned surgical intervention for aortic dissection repair. The participant will be observed and data gathered during the surgery and routine standard of care follow up visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related mortality
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of patients with mortality related to the treatment device
12 weeks
Number of participants with treatment-related neurological deficit
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of patients with neurological complications related to the treatment device
12 weeks
Number of patients with aortic injury associated with the implantation of the device
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of patients with aortic injury related to the treatment device
12 weeks
Aortic arch branch vessel patency
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The number of patients with arch branch vessel stenosis/ occlusion related to the treatment device
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with treatment-related mortality
Time Frame: 24 weeks and 12 months
The number of patients with mortality related to the device and procedure
24 weeks and 12 months
Number of participants with treatment-related neurological deficit
Time Frame: 24 weeks and 12 months
The number of patients with neurological complications, such as stroke, TIA, and paralysis/paraplegia) related to the treatment device
24 weeks and 12 months
Number of patients with aortic injury associated with the implantation of the device
Time Frame: 24 weeks and 12 months
The number of patients with aortic injury related to the treatment device
24 weeks and 12 months
Aortic arch branch vessel patency
Time Frame: 24 weeks and 12 months
The number of patients with arch branch vessel stenosis/ occlusion related to the treatment device
24 weeks and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Re-expansion of the true lumen
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The number of patients with achieved re-expansion of the true lumen following AMDS implantation
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
False lumen reattachment/positive remodeling
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The number of patients which exhibit positive remodeling/false lumen reattachment as measured by CT.
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
False Lumen Thrombosis
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The percentage of patients with evidence of false lumen thrombosis within the confinement of the AMDS, distal to the AMDS but proximal to the Celiac trunk, along the paravisceral aorta and in the infrarenal aorta.
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Stent-graft integrity Assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The percentage of patients without evidence of stent-graft fractures, kinking, or twisting leading to occlusion or ischemia in patients that have undergone aortic dissection repair with AMDS. Stent graft integrity will be evaluated by CTA with a Core Imaging Lab.
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Successful device deployment
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The number of patients which had successful device deployment
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
AMDS removal
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The percentage of patients that required AMDS removal
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
AMDS related re-interventions after the dissection repair
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The percentage of patients with need of secondary intervention related to the AMDS implantation following the index procedure for aortic dissection repair
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) duration
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The total time (in minutes) of CBP required for patients undergoing AMDS implantation
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Circulatory arrest duration
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The total time (in minutes) of circulatory arrest for patients undergoing AMDS implantation
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Time in ICU
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The total amount of days for patients that have undergo aortic dissection repair with AMDS implantation
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
Duration of hospitalization
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The total number of days of hospitalization required for patients undergoing AMDS implantation
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
AMDS procedure duration
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months
The total amount of time (in minutes) that it takes for AMDS to be implanted
12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jorg Kempfert, MD, German Heart Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 26, 2018

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 29, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intramural Hematoma

Clinical Trials on AMDS

3
Subscribe