Second and Third Look Laparoscopy in pT4 Colon Cancer Patients for Early Detection of Peritoneal Metastases (COLOPEC-II)

Second and Third Look Laparoscopy in pT4 Colon Cancer Patients for Early Detection of Peritoneal Metastases; the COLOPEC-II Randomized Multicentre Trial

The COLOPEC II multicentre randomized trial will investigate the role of second and third look laparoscopy to detect metachronous peritoneal metastases at a clinically occult stage during the follow-up of pT4 colon cancer patients. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, due to higher percentage of patients eligible for curative intent treatment with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Problem description Approximately 20-30% of patients with pT4 colon cancer develop peritoneal metastases (PM). The only proven curative option for macroscopic PM is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), but the efficacy and morbidity highly depend on the extent of peritoneal involvement. Unfortunately, due to restricted accuracy of imaging modalities and the absence of early symptoms, PM are often detected at a stage in which only about 20-25% of patients are eligible for CRS+HIPEC, and even these patients appear to have a relatively high peritoneal cancer index (PCI). New diagnostic strategies are urgently required to detect PM at an early stage, resulting in a higher percentage of patients eligible for CRS+HIPEC, which will translate into better survival because of the uniformly reported direct association between PCI and survival.

Proposed solution Preliminary findings of the COLOPEC trial (NCT02231086) revealed that PM were already detected at intentionally adjuvant HIPEC within 2 months after resection of the primary tumour in 10% of patients with pT4 colon cancer. Based on these findings and literature, second look diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) to detect PM when the disease is still potentially curable by CRS+HIPEC may be considered as an essential component of early follow-up of pT4 colon cancer. This needs confirmation in a larger patient cohort before implementing this in practice. Furthermore, metachronous PM develop later on (>12 months) in an additional 15-20% of the patients. These patients will be missed by a second look DLS and might therefore benefit from a third look DLS later on, which will be investigated in the COLOPEC II trial.

Objective The primary aim of this study is to determine the added value of third look DLS after a negative second look DLS in pT4 colon cancer patients to detect PM at a clinically occult stage.

Study design This is a randomized multicentre trial in which eligible patients will have routine CT-abdomen at 6 months postoperative (+3 months for those still treated with adjuvant chemotherapy), followed by second look DLS within 1 month after CT if no PM or other metastases not amenable for local treatment are detected. Patients without PM found during second look DLS will subsequently be randomized between routine follow-up including CT-abdomen at 18 months in the control arm, or an experimental arm with a third look DLS provided that PM or incurable metastases are absent at the 18 months CT-abdomen. The primary endpoint of the study is the proportion of PM detected after negative second look DLS. The primary endpoint will be determined at 20 months.

Study population Patients aged 18-80 years who underwent intentionally curative resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, either with or without adjuvant systemic chemotherapy, who are fit enough and surgically accessible to undergo second look DLS between 6-10 months postoperatively and subsequent treatment of PM if detected.

Intervention DLS will be performed in patients not already diagnosed with PM and without other metastases that impede curative intent treatment. Access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia by open introduction away from areas of expected adhesions, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging of the intra-abdominal cavity is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the PCI for those patients with suspected PM.

Expected outcome It is hypothesized that in patients who had a negative second look DLS, PM become clinically apparent in 5% until 20 months postoperatively with routine follow-up. A third look DLS following a negative CT-abdomen at 18 months postoperative is expected to detect an additional 10% of PM. It is expected that detection of PM at a clinically occult stage will translate into survival benefit, based on the observation that survival rates after CRS+HIPEC are higher if the PCI is lower.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

389

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Almere, Netherlands
        • Flevoziekenhuis
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • OLVG
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Amsterdam UMC, location AMC
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands
        • Catharina hospital
      • Groningen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands
        • St. Antonius Hospital
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboudumc
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Utrecht

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Curative intent resection of pT4a,bN0-2M0 colon cancer or rectosigmoid cancer above the peritoneal reflection, with or without adjuvant systemic therapy;
  • Age between 18 and 80 years;
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Histological subtype other than (mucinous) adenocarcinoma or signet-ring cell carcinoma;
  • Clinical condition that does not allow for second look surgery or subsequent treatment of PM if detected;
  • Second look surgery thought not to be technically possible (i.e. because of extensive abdominal surgery / re-interventions).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2nd look DLS + routine FU
Follow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up according to the Dutch colorectal cancer guideline until 5 years.
Patients visit the outpatient clinic twice a year during the first two to three years and annually thereafter, until five years postoperative. CEA-levels are determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months after primary resection. Detection of liver metastases with ultrasound or CT is performed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperative. At 6 and 18 months postoperative, a CT-scan is part of the study protocol, but ultrasound of the liver is allowed for other time intervals during follow-up. Colonoscopy is performed at 12 and 48 months postoperative.
Second look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 6-9 months (depending last date of adjuvant chemotherapy) and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications.
Experimental: 2nd and 3rd DLS + routine FU
Follow-up after curatively resected pT4 colon cancer, consisting of second look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 6-9 months and normal CEA, with subsequent routine follow-up and third look DLS after negative CT abdomen at 18 months and normal CEA. Third look DLS is not performed in patients with evidence of disease that is not curable, or in those already diagnosed with PM in the preceding period.
Patients visit the outpatient clinic twice a year during the first two to three years and annually thereafter, until five years postoperative. CEA-levels are determined at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 30, 36, 48 and 60 months after primary resection. Detection of liver metastases with ultrasound or CT is performed at 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperative. At 6 and 18 months postoperative, a CT-scan is part of the study protocol, but ultrasound of the liver is allowed for other time intervals during follow-up. Colonoscopy is performed at 12 and 48 months postoperative.
Second look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 6-9 months (depending last date of adjuvant chemotherapy) and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications.
Third look DLS is performed within one month from negative CT at 18 months and normal CEA. Laparoscopic access to the abdominal cavity is obtained under general anaesthesia, followed by adhesiolysis if necessary. Complete staging is performed, with biopsy of any lesion suspicious of PM, and determining the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in case of PM. Conversion to laparotomy not allowed for better exposure, but only for intra-operative complications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of peritoneal metastases detected after a negative second look DLS
Time Frame: 20 months
Peritoneal metastases that are detected using either routine follow-up or third look DLS according to randomization.
20 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of PM at second look DLS after curative treatment of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
Time Frame: 6-10 months
Occult peritoneal metastases not detected by routine CT scan 6-9 months after primary resection of pT4 colon cancer, that are detected at second look DLS performed at 6-10 months after the primary resection.
6-10 months
Incidence of PM during first 20 months after curative resection of primary tumour, depending on pathological pT4 stage, pathological nodal stage and histology
Time Frame: 20 months
This outcome measure tries to stratify pT4 colon cancer patients in clinically relevant subgroups based on their risk to develop PM.
20 months
Incidence of PM in patients who did or did not undergo adjuvant chemotherapy
Time Frame: 20 months
This outcome measure analysis a potential impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the development of PM.
20 months
Sensitivity, specificy, NPV and PPV of CT imaging to detect PM compared to DLS
Time Frame: 20 months
Diagnostic accuracy of CT using DLS findings as gold standard.
20 months
Proportion of detected PM eligible for curative intent CRS+HIPEC at different follow-up intervals
Time Frame: 20 months
This outcome measures determines the clinical impact of PM detection, considering potentially curative intent treatment.
20 months
30-day morbidity related to second/third look DLS
Time Frame: From the second or third look DLS till 30 days postoperative
This outcome measure is important to determine the harm/benefit ratio of DLS.
From the second or third look DLS till 30 days postoperative
Extent of adhesiolysis required at second/third look DLS assessed with the Zühlke score
Time Frame: 20 months

The Zühlke score measures the severity of intraabdominal adhesions.

  1. Filmy adhesions.
  2. Stronger adhesions requiring some sharp dissection.
  3. Dense vascularized adhesions requiring sharp dissection.
  4. Extreme dense vascularized adhesions with high risk for organ damage during dissection.

A higher score indicates a worse outcome.

20 months
5-year peritoneal recurrence free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
This outcome measure determines whether third look DLS has any impact on the overall detection of PM.
5 years
5-year disease-free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Important long-term oncological endpoint to determine the potential oncological benefit of third look DLS.
5 years
5-year overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Important long-term oncological endpoint to determine the potential oncological benefit of third look DLS.
5 years
Quality of life assessed with the CRC-29 questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years
Assessing impact of invasive diagnostic procedures on QOL.
2 years
Quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
Time Frame: 2 years
Assessing impact of invasive diagnostic procedures on QOL.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Cancer

  • University of California, San Francisco
    Completed
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Terminated
    Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Cancer Survivor | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Terminated
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Active, not recruiting
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC... and other conditions
    United States
  • M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
    Recruiting
    Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage... and other conditions
    United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    Completed
    Cancer Survivor | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...
    United States Department of Defense
    Active, not recruiting
    Colorectal Adenoma | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage 0 Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage I Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Colorectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIA Colorectal... and other conditions
    United States
  • City of Hope Medical Center
    Recruiting
    Colorectal Neoplasms | Colorectal Cancer | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Colorectal Cancer Stage II | Colorectal Cancer Stage III | Colorectal Cancer Stage IV | Colorectal Neoplasms Malignant | Colorectal Cancer Stage I
    United States, Japan, Italy, Spain
  • University of Roma La Sapienza
    Completed
    Colorectal Cancer Stage II | Colorectal Cancer Stage III | Colorectal Cancer Stage IV | Colorectal Cancer Stage 0 | Colorectal Cancer Stage I
    Italy
  • University of Southern California
    National Cancer Institute (NCI); Amgen
    Terminated
    Stage IV Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | RAS Wild Type | Stage III Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Colorectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Colorectal Cancer...
    United States

Clinical Trials on Routine follow-up

3
Subscribe