Brain Stimulation for Working Memory Deficits in Adolescents With ADHD

September 8, 2025 updated by: Bradley Hospital

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Working Memory Deficits in Adolescents With ADHD

Working memory (WM) is the foundational cognitive control process of holding information 'in mind' to execute goal-directed behaviors. WM deficits are an established component of ADHD. Despite being one of the strongest predictors of poor clinical and functional outcomes in pediatric mental health, there remains a dearth of available treatments for WM deficits.

Non-invasive brain stimulation hold tremendous promise in transforming psychiatry, as it takes a "brain-first" approach to treatment. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is the known structural foundation of WM, and the interaction between slow and fast brain waves (i.e., "theta-gamma coupling [TGC]") is a neural, functional foundation of WM. Thus, the DLPFC and TGC are potential brain-based targets for the modulation of WM with brain stimulation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a novel paradigm that applies a three-minute dose of stimulation to the DLPFC at an intensity that directly mimics TGC dynamics.

The objective of this study is to test whether iTBS can enhance dysfunctional brain activity that causes working memory deficits. iTBS will be tested compared to standard or traditional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), called 10 Hz TMS. It will also be compared to sham or fake TMS. Each participant receives a single session of each of these types of TMS. EEG will record neural activity during a working memory test immediately before and after each TMS session. If this study shows TMS can enhance dysfunctional brain activity, the next step will be to conduct a clinical trial to test if TMS can lead to a sustained, positive effect on working memory deficits.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Rhode Island
      • East Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02915
        • E. P. Bradley Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Ability to provide assent and have parent provide parental permission
  2. English fluency
  3. 13-17 years
  4. List Sorting Test (NIH Toolbox) performance: Greater than 1.0 standard deviation (SD) below normative mean
  5. Parent rating on BRIEF-2 Working Memory: Greater than 1.0 SD above normative mean
  6. IQ > 80
  7. Clinical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): predominantly inattentive type, predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type, combined type, or unspecified type. Diagnostic criteria will be confirmed with NICHQ Vanderbilt Assessment Scales-Parent.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants will be screened to exclude individuals with neurological or medical conditions that might confound the results, as well as to exclude participants in whom rTMS might result in increased risk of side effects or complications. Common TMS contraindications include metallic hardware in the body, cardiac pacemaker, patients with an implanted medication pumps or an intracardiac line, or prescription of medications known to lower seizure threshold. This accounts for the majority of the exclusion criteria listed:

  1. Intracranial pathology from a known genetic disorder (e.g., NF1, tuberous sclerosis) or from acquired neurologic disease (e.g. stroke, tumor), cerebral palsy, history of severe head injury, or significant dysmorphology
  2. History of fainting spells of unknown or undetermined etiology that might constitute seizures
  3. History of seizures, diagnosis of epilepsy, or immediate (1st degree relative) family history epilepsy
  4. Any progressive (e.g., neurodegenerative) neurological disorder
  5. Chronic (particularly) uncontrolled medical conditions that may cause a medical emergency in case of a provoked seizure (cardiac malformation, cardiac dysrhythmia, asthma, etc.)
  6. Contraindicated metal implants in the head, brain or spinal cord (excluding dental implants or fillings)
  7. Pacemaker
  8. Implanted medication pump
  9. Vagal nerve stimulator
  10. Deep brain stimulator
  11. TENS unit (unless removed completely for the study)
  12. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunt
  13. Signs of increased intracranial pressure
  14. Intracranial lesion (including incidental finding on MRI)
  15. History of head injury resulting in prolonged loss of consciousness
  16. Substance abuse or dependence within past six months (i.e., DSM-5 substance use disorder criteria met)
  17. Chronic treatment with prescription medications that decrease cortical seizure threshold

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS
sham
Experimental: 10 Hz rTMS
10 Hz (2,000 pulses) at left DLPFC
Experimental: iTBS rTMS
50 Hz, iTBS (600 pulses) at left DLPFC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compared to sham and 10 Hz, iTBS will enhance theta-gamma coupling during working memory demands
Time Frame: Within 24 hours
Within 24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Compared to sham and 10 Hz, iTBS will improve working memory test performance
Time Frame: Within 24 hours
Within 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian Kavanaugh, PsyD, E. P. Bradley Hospital/Alpert Medical School of Brown University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BradleyH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ADHD With Working Memory Deficits

Clinical Trials on Magstim Super Rapid2 stimulator, 10 Hz condition

Subscribe