Analytical and Clinical Performance Testing Plan

March 3, 2021 updated by: Sight Diagnostics
Clinical and analytical tests will be performed based on risk assessment and system specifications to verify that the performance of the investigational device is in accordance with its specifications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Comparison and precision studies will be conducted in up to 5 clinical sites in Israel and the US, and include:

  • Precision
  • Sample Matrix Comparison
  • Method comparison study and flagging analysis
  • Reference interval range

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

679

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult and pediatric patients with normal (healthy) or abnormal blood counts (known clinical condition)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For Residual Samples:

  • Specimen obtained by venipuncture or finger prick and collected into tubes normally used by the site
  • Patient is at least 3 months of age
  • Samples within 8 hours from phlebotomy

For Prospectively collected samples:

  • Subject is at least 22 years of age
  • Non-diseased individuals or, for specific studies, individuals with blood count ranges to cover indicated medical decision points and ranges
  • Samples within 8 hours from phlebotomy

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria post blood draw and pre sample scan - For whole blood samples:

  • Visibly hemolyzed or clotted specimens
  • Specimens with insufficient blood volume to complete the procedure
  • Samples older than eight hours

Exclusion criteria post sample scan:

  • Instrument failure or sample rejected by the instrument due to system error or sample mishandling
  • The daily quality control sample measurements indicate that the assay run is outside the specifications for the instrument
  • Operator related error documented in the study records
  • Failure to adhere to study specifics or protocols

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hematology Analyzer - OLO
The investigational device is a quantitative multi-parameter automated hematology analyzer intended for in vitro diagnostic use in screening capillary or venous whole blood samples.
Complete blood counts from OLO will be determined from analysis of whole blood samples
Hematology Analyzer - Predicate
The predicate device is a quantitative multi-parameter automated hematology analyzer intended for in vitro diagnostic use in screening patient populations found in clinical and reference laboratories.
Complete blood counts from Predicate will be determined from analysis of whole blood samples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reproducibility of CBC parameters provided by the OLO device
Time Frame: 3 months
Reproducibility studies will be conducted using 3 levels of commercial control materials (low, normal and high) to measure all CBC reported parameters. Control material will be run on two instruments at each site. Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) will be calculated for each measurand for: (1) Between lots/sites; (2) Between instruments; (3) Between days; (4)Between operators/runs; (5) within-run and (6) total variability
3 months
Repeatability of CBC parameters provided by the OLO device
Time Frame: 3 months
Performance of the OLO device will be measured through repeatability of 20 replicates for 11 residual samples on each site. Samples collected for this study will include 4 within lab reference range, 3 around lower medical decision levels for HGB, PLT and WBC, and 4 around the upper range for RBC, HGB, WBC and PLT to cover all pathological levels and medical decision points. Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) will be computed for each measurand per sample by site.
3 months
Sample Matrix Comparison
Time Frame: 3 months
Paird capillary and venous whole blood samples will be collected. The samples will be analyzed in duplicate on the Sight OLO device. Analysis will include Passing-Bablok Regression analysis per parameter (Bland Altman plots, slope, intercept, with 95% confidence intervals, correlation coefficient, and % bias), between: The average of venous whole blood samples scans and average of capillary whole blood sample scans from the same individual on the Sight OLO device
3 months
Method Comparison
Time Frame: 3 months
Evaluate the performance of the OLO device in comparison to values achieved with the predicate. Analysis will include Regression parameters (slope, intercept with 95% CI) between measurement of Sight OLO and measurement on predicate (Correlation coefficient, Bland Altman plots and overall % bias between predicate and Sight OLO device including % bias at medical decision points).
3 months
Reference Interval Range
Time Frame: 3 months
Establish adult venous and fingerprick reference intervals for the OLO device. The non-parametric method will be used to calculate the lower and upper limits of the reference range.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr. Eldad Hod, Dr, Colombia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PR00014

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hematology

Clinical Trials on Hematology Analyzer - OLO

3
Subscribe