- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03627039
Metformin And Cardiovascular Effectiveness vs SGLT2 (MACES)
The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors relative to metformin for reducing subsequent cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
The investigators will conduct a population-based, new-user, longitudinal-cohort study using a nationwide US commercial insurance claims database. The investigators will compare adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 over the age of 18 who were newly prescribed an SGLT2 inhibitor or metformin between March 29, 2013 (date of US approval of first SGLT2) and January 1st, 2017 (most recent available data). Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 will be identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes. Cohort entry date will be the date of the first prescription for an SGLT2 or metformin. New users of SGLT2 or metformin will be defined as those without a prior prescription for either class of medications, or any other medication for diabetes, in the preceding 180 days.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Baseline Covariates: All covariates will be assessed prior to cohort entry. Covariates will reflect diagnoses and procedures recorded during health encounters, including chronic medical conditions (e.g., hypertension, coronary artery disease), diabetes severity (e.g., hemoglobin A1C, end-organ damage), overall healthcare utilization (e.g., recent hospitalization, emergency department visit), prescriber characteristics (e.g., endocrinologist, general practitioner), and medications (e.g., anti-hypertensives, diuretics).
Statistical analysis Propensity score matching will be used to adjust for confounding. The probability of initiating an SGLT2-inhibitor will be calculated through a multivariable logistic regression model containing all of the baseline covariates. Using this propensity score, patients prescribed an SGLT2 were matched 1:1 with patients prescribed metformin using a caliper of up to 0.1 on the probability scale. Covariate balance between the matched cohorts was assessed using standardized differences. Since laboratory data were not available for all patients, these were not included in the propensity score estimation.
After propensity score matching, proportional hazards models will be used to estimate the incidence rate, hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the primary outcome without further adjustments. Schoenfeld residuals will be plotted to assess the proportional hazards assumption. Predefined sensitivity and subgroup analyses included an intention to treat analysis where the censoring criteria of drug discontinuation, switching or augmentation are removed. The investigators will also assess the primary risk in a cohort restricted to patients with a past-history of cardiovascular disease if our sample size allows it. To test the specificity of our findings, the investigators will also conduct a tracer analysis using cellulitis as an outcome, since cellulitis is not associated with SGLT2s or metformin.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02130
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
INCLUSION:
- all patients newly prescribed an SGLT2 or metformin between March 29, 2013 to January 1st, 2017 with at least 6 months of continuous enrollment (1 year in a sensitivity analysis)
EXCLUSION:
- age < 18 years
- previous use of any diabetes medication
- lack of a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
- history of malignant neoplasm
- dialysis
- type 1 diabetes
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Truven
NOTE: In the case there are not enough patients/events data will be included from other databases (e.g., Optum, Medicare)
|
All SGLT2 medications approved prior to 2017 will be included (Canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin (all doses, all of the medications are oral)
Other Names:
Metformin is the main comparator of interest.
In a secondary analysis GLP1 will be the comparator
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cardiovascular composite (stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure)
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
The outcome will be identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates of acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke (they will only be analyzed individually if there are sufficient number of one of the events defined as > 30 events)
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Harms: Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Hypoglycemia: identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Harms: diabetic ketoacidosis
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Diabetic ketoacidosis: identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Harms: lactic acidosis
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Lactic acidosis: identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Harms: Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Acute kidney injury: identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Harms: Genital infection
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Genital infection: identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Costs
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and cost analysis will end 1 year thereafter
|
Costs of metformin compared to SGLT2.
Estimates for costs associated with the individual outcomes.
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and cost analysis will end 1 year thereafter
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Tracer outcomes
Time Frame: Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
The outcome will be identified using ICD9 and ICD10 codes and reported as rates (1) Cellulitis
|
Follow-up will begin one day after cohort entry and continue until medication discontinuation, study outcome, or no further data. Most patients will have 200 days of follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Glucose Metabolism Disorders
- Metabolic Diseases
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Hypoglycemic Agents
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
- Dapagliflozin
- Metformin
- Empagliflozin
- Canagliflozin
Other Study ID Numbers
- 123 (Giresun University Scientific Research Project)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Mannkind CorporationTerminatedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityBoehringer IngelheimCompletedDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 (T2DM)Germany
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusSwitzerland
-
India Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr. A. Ramachandran...CompletedTYpe 2 Diabetes MellitusIndia
-
Scripps Whittier Diabetes InstituteSan Diego State UniversityCompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)United States
-
Griffin HospitalCalifornia Walnut CommissionCompletedDIABETES MELLITUS TYPE 2United States
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsAmerican Diabetes AssociationCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Dexa Medica GroupCompletedType-2 Diabetes MellitusIndonesia
-
Diabetes Foundation, IndiaNational Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol FoundationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus With ComplicationIndia
Clinical Trials on SGLT2
-
Samsung Medical CenterNot yet recruitingHeart Failure, Preserved Ejection FractionKorea, Republic of
-
Sadat City UniversityBeni-Suef UniversityCompleted
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRecruitingDiabetes | Kidney Disease, ChronicUnited States
-
Hamad Medical CorporationRecruiting
-
University of MinnesotaRecruiting
-
Jeil Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.CompletedHealthy AdultKorea, Republic of
-
Ewha Womans University Mokdong HospitalEnrolling by invitationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | Atrial Fibrillation | SGLT-2 InhibitorKorea, Republic of
-
University of AarhusAarhus University HospitalRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Left Ventricle HypertrophiedDenmark
-
University of OxfordCompletedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseUnited Kingdom
-
Dongying ZhangRecruitingMyocardial Infarction | Diabetes MellitusChina