Comparing Hall vs Conventional Technique in Placing Preformed Metal Crowns From Sudan

August 20, 2018 updated by: Fadil Elamin, Khartoum Centre for Research and Medical Training

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Hall vs Conventional Technique in Placing Preformed Metal Crowns From Sudan

Preformed metal crowns (PMCs) have high success rates in restoring primary molars in children but they were not generally used by dentists, especially in developing countries due to its demand of high clinical skills with the conventional technique (CT). The biological approach, Hall technique (HT), requires less training and can be placed by less experienced dental operators including therapists. Previous studies were mainly carried out in developed countries. The aims were to investigate and compare the efficacies and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by these two techniques.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A prospective randomised control trial design was used. The study was carried out in a dental practice in Sudan, an under-developed country with lower social economic group. Children between 5-8 years were invited and selected if they met the inclusion criteria. Only those who had 1-2 carious primary molars needing PMCs were randomised. The PMCs were placed by a dentist in the CT arm and by a therapist in the HT arm. The children were follow up every 6 months up to 2 years. The demographic details, periodontal health, occlusion, children anxieties, and procedure time were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates for each arm were calculated. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using the results and the local salaries

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children with Class I or class II carious primary molars

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had a compromised medical history
  • Were pre- or un-cooperative to have clinical examinations
  • Lived in remote villages and were unlikely to return for follow-up
  • Had teeth with pain or sepsis
  • Had teeth with caries extended in pulp either from clinical or radiographic examinations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hall Technique
The intervention involves removal from the primary molar and a preformed metal crown is placed using glass ionomer. The subject is then asked to bite until crown is seated. No occlusal adjustment is carried out.
Hall Technique primary fitted crowns to restore carious primary molars
Other: Conventional Technique
The procedure involves administering local anesthetic and the intervention involves remoal of caries from the affected primary molar. The tooth is then reshaped and contoured to to enable a preformed metal crown placement. Occlusal and marginal fit is improved by crimping the metal crown to improve fit. The preformed metal crown is cemented with glass ionomer restorative material and occlusion finally checked. The subject is then asked to bite on a cotton roll for two minutes until the cement has set.
Hall Technique primary fitted crowns to restore carious primary molars

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: 24 months
If PMC intact and crown functional or not
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gingival helath
Time Frame: 24 months
Modified gingival index after Löe et al. (1967); Scale; 0=No disease; 1=hyperplasia with no bleeding; 2= hyperplasia with bleeding
24 months
Plaque Index
Time Frame: 24 months
Plaque accumulation around preformed metal crown after Loe et al (1967); Scale: 0= no plaque, 1= subgingival plaque; 2= supragingival plaque
24 months
Occlusion
Time Frame: 24 months
Natural teeth are in occlusion following PMC placement
24 months
Anxiety
Time Frame: 12 months
Self perceived anxiety using facial image scale after Buchanan and Niven (2002) using 5 facial diagrams ranging from sad to smiley faces: Scale; 1-5; 1=extremely happy to 5=extremely unhappy
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dr Yousra, PhD, University of Khartoum

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KhartoumCentre

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caries, Dental

Clinical Trials on Hall Technique PMC

3
Subscribe