- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03642717
Regulatory Request NIS in Korea
A Regulatory Requirement Non Interventional Study to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of JARDIANCE DUO® (Empagliflozin/Metformin, 5/500mg, 5/850mg, 5/1000mg, 12.5/500mg, 12.5/850mg, 12.5/1000mg) in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Study Overview
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Ansan, Korea, Republic of, 15355
- Korea University Ansan Hospital
-
Bucheon, Korea, Republic of, 14754
- Hyewon Medical Foundation Sejong Hospital
-
Busan, Korea, Republic of, 48108
- Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
-
Busan, Korea, Republic of, 47392
- Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
-
Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 41931
- Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
-
Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 35233
- Eulji University Hospital
-
Goyang, Korea, Republic of, 10475
- Myongji Hospital
-
Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 61469
- Chonnam National University Hospital
-
Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 21565
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center
-
Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 22332
- Inha University Hospital
-
Seongnam, Korea, Republic of, 13620
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02447
- Kyung Hee University Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07441
- Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 04763
- Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02053
- Seoul Medical Center
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 01757
- Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 04404
- SoonChunHyang University Seoul Hospital
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07937
- Hongik Hospital
-
Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 16499
- Ajou University Hospital
-
Wonju, Korea, Republic of, 26426
- Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who have started at first time on JARDIANCE DUO® in accordance with the approved label in Korea
- Age ≥19 years at enrolment
- Patients who have signed on the data release consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with previous exposure to JARDIANCE®, JARDIANCE DUO®
- Hypersensitivity to active ingredients empagliflozin and/or metformin or to any of the excipients
- Moderate (stage 3b) and severe renal failure (CrCl < 45 ml/min or eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 square meter)
- Acute conditions with the potential to alter renal function such as: dehydration, severe infection, cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, sepsis
- Type1 diabetes, acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis with or without coma, history of a ketoacidosis (type 1 diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis should be treated with insulin).
- Congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic management, in particular those with unstable or acute congestive heart failure
- Radiologic studies involving the use of intravascular iodinated contrast materials (for example, intravenous urogram, intravenous cholangiography, angiography, and computed tomography (CT) scans with intravascular contrast materials)
- Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media may lead to acute renal failure and has been associated with lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin.
Therefore, in patients with eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73m2, JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued prior to, or at the time of the test and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further. In patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR 45-60 ml/min/1.73m2), JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued 48 hours before administration of iodinated contrast media and not be reinstituted until at least 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further.
- In patients with severe infections or severe traumatic systemic disorders, JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended, and should not be restarted until the patient's oral intake has resumed and renal function has been evaluated as normal.
- JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended for any surgical procedure(except minor procedures not associated with restricted intake of food and fluids)before 48 hours, and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, after renal function has been evaluated as normal.
- Patients with malnutrition, starvation, hypostheniam pituitary or adrenal insufficiency
- Impaired hepatic function (since impaired hepatic function has been associated with some cases of lactic acidosis, JARDIANCE DUO® should generally be avoided in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease), pulmonary infarction, severe respiratory impairment, any condition associated with hypoxemia, excessive alcohol intake, GI disorders such as dehydration, diarrhoea or vomiting
- Pregnant women, women who may be pregnant, nursing women
- Disease which may cause tissue hypoxia (especially acute disease, or worsening of chronic disease) such as: decompensated heart failure, respiratory failure, recent myocardial infarction, shock
- Current participation in other clinical trials
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Case-Only
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
empagliflozin and metformin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of participants with any adverse events was reported.
The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
|
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Relating to Study Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of participants with adverse events relating to study drug was reported.
The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
|
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of participants with unexpected adverse events was reported.
The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
|
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of participants with adverse events of special interest was reported.
The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
|
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drug was reported.
The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
|
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of Participants Reached Target Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of participants reached target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit was reported.
Target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was defined as HbA1c less than 7%.
|
At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of Participants With Relative Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c Decrease of 0.5% Comparing to Baseline) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of participants with relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit was reported.
Relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at last visit was defined as HbA1c decrease of 0.5% or more at the last visit comparing to baseline.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the Body Weight at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the body weight at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Change in the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
|
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of Participants Per Final Effectiveness Assessment Category at Last Visit
Time Frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Number of participants per final effectiveness assessment category at Last Visit was reported.
The final effectiveness consisted of 4 categories: Improved (If determined as there was any effect of maintaining or improving disease related factors.),
Unchanged (If disease related factors had not been changed compared with before administration, and not determined as there was any effect of maintaining symptoms.),
Aggravated (If disease related factors were worse than before administration.),
and Unassessable (If it cannot be determined due to insufficient information collected.).
|
At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Jane(JiEun) Lee, 8227090092, jane.lee.ext@boehringer-ingelheim.com
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1276-0039
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents, except for the following exclusions: 1. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; 2. studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; 3. studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (because of limitations with anonymization). Requestors can use the following link http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/ to:
- find information in order to request access to clinical study data, for listed studies.
- request access to clinical study documents that meet criteria, and upon a signed 'Document Sharing Agreement.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
-
SanofiCompletedType 1 Diabetes Mellitus-Type 2 Diabetes MellitusHungary, Russian Federation, Germany, Poland, Japan, United States, Finland
-
Mannkind CorporationTerminatedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus | Type 1 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityBoehringer IngelheimCompletedDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 (T2DM)Germany
-
Scripps Whittier Diabetes InstituteSan Diego State UniversityCompletedType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)United States
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusSwitzerland
-
India Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr. A. Ramachandran...CompletedTYpe 2 Diabetes MellitusIndia
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsAmerican Diabetes AssociationCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Dexa Medica GroupCompletedType-2 Diabetes MellitusIndonesia
-
Diabetes Foundation, IndiaNational Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol FoundationRecruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus With ComplicationIndia
-
Diabetes Free, Inc.Not yet recruitingDiabetes Mellitus Type 2 - Insulin-Treated
Clinical Trials on JARDIANCE DUO®
-
Medical University of ViennaCompletedInfluence of Lachrymal Substitutes on Tear Film Thickness in Patients With Moderate Dry Eye SyndromeDry Eye SyndromeAustria
-
Handok Inc.CompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusKorea, Republic of
-
CroiValve LimitedRecruitingHeart Valve Diseases | Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency | Tricuspid Regurgitation | Tricuspid Valve DiseaseUnited States
-
University of SalernoRoberto Erro; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Antonella Santonicola; Carolina CiacciRecruitingParkinson Disease | ConstipationItaly
-
Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des ArméesUnknownSprain of Lateral Ligament of Ankle JointFrance
-
Eko Devices, Inc.Columbia University; Sentara Norfolk General HospitalRecruiting
-
Imperial College LondonRecruitingHeart FailureUnited Kingdom
-
Sheba Medical CenterMedtronicCompletedType 1 DiabetesIsrael
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompletedObservation of Major Duodenal Papilla (MDP)China
-
ReShape LifesciencesRegional Hospital. Viale Rodolfi 37. 36100 Vicenza. ITALY; Casa di Cura Solatrix...Completed