Regulatory Request NIS in Korea

April 29, 2021 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Regulatory Requirement Non Interventional Study to Monitor the Safety and Effectiveness of JARDIANCE DUO® (Empagliflozin/Metformin, 5/500mg, 5/850mg, 5/1000mg, 12.5/500mg, 12.5/850mg, 12.5/1000mg) in Korean Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

To monitor the safety profile and effectiveness of JARDIANCE DUO® in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

658

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ansan, Korea, Republic of, 15355
        • Korea University Ansan Hospital
      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of, 14754
        • Hyewon Medical Foundation Sejong Hospital
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 48108
        • Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of, 47392
        • Inje University Busan Paik Hospital
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of, 41931
        • Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of, 35233
        • Eulji University Hospital
      • Goyang, Korea, Republic of, 10475
        • Myongji Hospital
      • Gwangju, Korea, Republic of, 61469
        • Chonnam National University Hospital
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 21565
        • Gachon University Gil Medical Center
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of, 22332
        • Inha University Hospital
      • Seongnam, Korea, Republic of, 13620
        • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02447
        • Kyung Hee University Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07441
        • Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 04763
        • Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 02053
        • Seoul Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 01757
        • Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 04404
        • SoonChunHyang University Seoul Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 07937
        • Hongik Hospital
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 16499
        • Ajou University Hospital
      • Wonju, Korea, Republic of, 26426
        • Yonsei University Wonju Severance Christian Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This is an observational prospective, non-interventional, open-label, multi-centre national study. It will provide additional safety information of JARDIANCE DUO® (empagliflozin/metformin) in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a routine clinical practice setting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have started at first time on JARDIANCE DUO® in accordance with the approved label in Korea
  • Age ≥19 years at enrolment
  • Patients who have signed on the data release consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous exposure to JARDIANCE®, JARDIANCE DUO®
  • Hypersensitivity to active ingredients empagliflozin and/or metformin or to any of the excipients
  • Moderate (stage 3b) and severe renal failure (CrCl < 45 ml/min or eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 square meter)
  • Acute conditions with the potential to alter renal function such as: dehydration, severe infection, cardiovascular collapse (shock), acute myocardial infarction, sepsis
  • Type1 diabetes, acute or chronic metabolic acidosis, including diabetic ketoacidosis with or without coma, history of a ketoacidosis (type 1 diabetes and diabetic ketoacidosis should be treated with insulin).
  • Congestive heart failure requiring pharmacologic management, in particular those with unstable or acute congestive heart failure
  • Radiologic studies involving the use of intravascular iodinated contrast materials (for example, intravenous urogram, intravenous cholangiography, angiography, and computed tomography (CT) scans with intravascular contrast materials)
  • Intravascular administration of iodinated contrast media may lead to acute renal failure and has been associated with lactic acidosis in patients receiving metformin.

Therefore, in patients with eGFR > 60ml/min/1.73m2, JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued prior to, or at the time of the test and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further. In patients with moderate renal impairment (eGFR 45-60 ml/min/1.73m2), JARDIANCE DUO® must be discontinued 48 hours before administration of iodinated contrast media and not be reinstituted until at least 48 hours afterwards, and only after renal function has been re-evaluated and has not deteriorated further.

  • In patients with severe infections or severe traumatic systemic disorders, JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended, and should not be restarted until the patient's oral intake has resumed and renal function has been evaluated as normal.
  • JARDIANCE DUO® should be temporarily suspended for any surgical procedure(except minor procedures not associated with restricted intake of food and fluids)before 48 hours, and not be reinstituted until 48 hours afterwards, after renal function has been evaluated as normal.
  • Patients with malnutrition, starvation, hypostheniam pituitary or adrenal insufficiency
  • Impaired hepatic function (since impaired hepatic function has been associated with some cases of lactic acidosis, JARDIANCE DUO® should generally be avoided in patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of hepatic disease), pulmonary infarction, severe respiratory impairment, any condition associated with hypoxemia, excessive alcohol intake, GI disorders such as dehydration, diarrhoea or vomiting
  • Pregnant women, women who may be pregnant, nursing women
  • Disease which may cause tissue hypoxia (especially acute disease, or worsening of chronic disease) such as: decompensated heart failure, respiratory failure, recent myocardial infarction, shock
  • Current participation in other clinical trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
empagliflozin and metformin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Any Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of participants with any adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Relating to Study Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of participants with adverse events relating to study drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of Participants With Unexpected Adverse Events
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of participants with unexpected adverse events was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of participants with adverse events of special interest was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of the Drug
Time Frame: From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.
Percentage of participants with adverse events leading to discontinuation of the drug was reported. The 95% Confidence Interval for the percentage of participants with adverse event was calculated by Exact Method.
From baseline (Visit 1) until last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study), up to 349 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of Participants Reached Target Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of participants reached target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c < 7%) at Last Visit was reported. Target effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was defined as HbA1c less than 7%.
At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of Participants With Relative Effectiveness Response in the Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) (HbA1c Decrease of 0.5% Comparing to Baseline) at Last Visit
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of participants with relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Last Visit was reported. Relative effectiveness response in the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at last visit was defined as HbA1c decrease of 0.5% or more at the last visit comparing to baseline.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the Body Weight at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the body weight at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Last Visit From Baseline
Time Frame: At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Change in the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at Last Visit from baseline was reported.
At baseline (Visit 1) and at last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of Participants Per Final Effectiveness Assessment Category at Last Visit
Time Frame: At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).
Number of participants per final effectiveness assessment category at Last Visit was reported. The final effectiveness consisted of 4 categories: Improved (If determined as there was any effect of maintaining or improving disease related factors.), Unchanged (If disease related factors had not been changed compared with before administration, and not determined as there was any effect of maintaining symptoms.), Aggravated (If disease related factors were worse than before administration.), and Unassessable (If it cannot be determined due to insufficient information collected.).
At last visit (the last follow-up visit a patient actually received during the study, up to Day 349 after baseline).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Jane(JiEun) Lee, 8227090092, jane.lee.ext@boehringer-ingelheim.com

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Clinical studies sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim, phases I to IV, interventional and non-interventional, are in scope for sharing of the raw clinical study data and clinical study documents, except for the following exclusions: 1. studies in products where Boehringer Ingelheim is not the license holder; 2. studies regarding pharmaceutical formulations and associated analytical methods, and studies pertinent to pharmacokinetics using human biomaterials; 3. studies conducted in a single center or targeting rare diseases (because of limitations with anonymization). Requestors can use the following link http://trials.boehringer-ingelheim.com/ to:

  1. find information in order to request access to clinical study data, for listed studies.
  2. request access to clinical study documents that meet criteria, and upon a signed 'Document Sharing Agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on JARDIANCE DUO®

3
Subscribe