Combined Conventional Speech Therapy and Functional Electrical Stimulation in Dysphagia Following Stroke

October 18, 2020 updated by: Klayne Cunha Matos, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza

Randomized Study of the Influence of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Patients With Dysphagia After Stroke

This study will evaluate the effectiveness of conventional speech therapy associated with functional electrical stimulation in patients with dysphagia after ischemic stroke. Included patients will be divided into two groups, where in the intervention group the speech therapy is associated to functional electrical stimulation, and in the control group, the patients will receive the conventional speech therapy with electrical stimulation Placebo with intensity 0hz.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Since the 1980's, electrical stimulation has been used for therapeutic purposes in Brazil, and, since 1990's, it has been used as a relevant therapeutic tool in the cases of oropharyngeal dysphagia in addition to speech therapy. Positive results have been observed in the treatment of swallowing disorders, including in patients that carry neurological diseases. However, there is no substantial evidences for this interventions.

In this study, the electrotherapy will be used as a complement to conventional speech therapy and performed the application of electrical stimulation protocol in dysphagia, through the apparatus Neurodyn Portable TENS/FES (transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation/ functional electrical stimulation), which is a transcutaneous neuromuscular stimulator flow TENS/FES from two channels with independent intensity adjustment. It is about a non-invasive technique with no systemic effect, causing no dependence or undesirable side effects, and consists by gentle application in electrical stimulation, through electrodes placed in body areas affected by pain or to activate skeletal muscles and produce movements. A channel of electrodes will be placed in the submental region and the other channel on the thyroid cartilage., in formation of a T. The explication of the procedure in the patient treatment, is describing the sensations that he should expect that happened during the stimulation. The intensity of necessary flow to apply in the treatment, will depend in the sensation of the patient, therefore, it is applicable until the tolerance level or desirable muscular contraction. Thus, the treatment should be initiated with minimal levels of intensity, by being carefully raised if appropriate effects are achieved on the procedure and according to the patient report.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ceará
      • Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil, 60430-160
        • Ubiversidade Federal do Ceará

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke - ischemic type;
  • Dysphagia following stroke;
  • 40 to 70 years old;
  • Exclusive enteral Feeding;
  • Glasgow > 11.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnants;
  • Febrile Condition;
  • Neoplasia;
  • Pacemaker;
  • Cochlear Implant;
  • Anxious Patient;
  • Degenerative Neurological Diseases.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional Electrical Stimulation

- Functional electrical stimulation device obeying the following steps: Muscle heating - 2 min, 10 Hz, 250 μm; Potentiation of muscle fibers type I - 8 min, 30 Hz, 250 μm; Potentiation of muscle fibers type II - 8 min, 80 Hz, 300 μm; Toning - 8 min, 30 Hz, 300 μm; Muscle Relaxation - 4 min, 5 Hz, 200 μm One channel of electrodes will be placed in the submental region and the other in the thyroid. Treatment should be started at minimum levels of intensity, increasing carefully until appropriate effects are achieved in the procedure. Conventional therapy should be performed in conjunction with functional electrostimulation

-Conventional speech therapy with laryngeal elevation exercises, stimulation of oral reflexes, tongue movements, lips and cheeks, gustatory therapy

Functional electrical stimulation device obeying the following steps:

Muscle heating - 2 min, 10 Hz, 250 μm; Potentiation of muscle fibers type I - 8 min, 30 Hz, 250 μm; Potentiation of muscle fibers type II - 8 min, 80 Hz, 300 μm; Toning - 8 min, 30 Hz, 300 μm; Muscle Relaxation - 4 min, 5 Hz, 200 μm One channel of electrodes will be placed in the submental region and the other in the thyroid. Treatment should be started at minimum levels of intensity, increasing carefully until appropriate effects are achieved in the procedure

Conventional speech therapy with laryngeal elevation exercises, stimulation of oral reflexes such as swallowing reflex, tongue movements, lips and cheeks, gustatory therapy
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

Sham.The electrodes are placed at 0 Hz

-Conventional speech therapy with laryngeal elevation exercises, stimulation of oral reflexes, tongue movements, lips and cheeks, gustatory therapy

Conventional speech therapy with laryngeal elevation exercises, stimulation of oral reflexes such as swallowing reflex, tongue movements, lips and cheeks, gustatory therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of dysphagia assessed by videoendoscopy of swallowing
Time Frame: 5 days ( before and immediately after intervention)

Anatomical Evaluation:Tongue, palate, pharynx, larynx - normal or specify changes

Functional Evaluation:

  • Mobility (lips/tongue), tongue's sensitivity, palatine veil's closure - adequate or inadequate
  • Pharynx - salivary/alimentary stasis
  • Larynx - normal, decreased mobility, unilateral or bilateral immobility

Deglutition assessment (liquid, thick, pasty and solid foods):

-Delay of swallowing, anterior/posterior escape, stasis in vallecula/pyriform sinuses, laryngeal penetration, laryngotracheal aspiration - present or absent

Functional swallowing: alteration in anatomical or functional evaluation with absence of salivary/alimentary stasis Mild dysphagia: there is also salivary or food stasis in only one consistency with efficient maneuvers such as lowered head, Masako or effortless swallowing Moderate dysphagia: there is also laryngeal penetration to one or more consistencies Severe dysphagia: there is also laryngotracheal aspiration or absence of swallowing reflex

5 days ( before and immediately after intervention)
Safe food Intake assessed by Functional Scale Oral Ingestion - FOIS
Time Frame: 5 days (before and immediately after intervention)

Measured by the Functional Oral Ingestion Scale (FOIS). FOIS results are rated on a scale of 1 to 7 levels. The levels will increase according to the safe amount of oral diet ingested by the patient safely.

Level1 - nothing by mouth; Level 2 - tube dependent with minimal attempts of Food or liquid; Level 3 - tube dependent with consistence oral Intake of Food or liquid; Level 4 - total oral diet of a single consistency; Level 5 - total oral diet with multiple consistencies but requiring special preparation or compensations; Level 6 - total oral diet with multiplex consistencies without special preparation, but with specific Food limitations; Level 7 - total oral diet with no restrictions.

5 days (before and immediately after intervention)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical evaluation of swallowing through the risk assessment protocol for dysphagia - PARD
Time Frame: 5 days (before and immediately after intervention)

Before feeding:

  • Comprehensive language, oral reflexes(vomiting, trismus, deglutition) and sialorrhea- present or absent
  • Inside oral and facial sensitivity- present or reduced

During feeding (liquid, thick and pasty):

  • Captation, anterior and posterior escape, cough reflex and gagging- present or absent
  • Oral transit time, number of swallowing, laryngeal elevation- adequate or inadequate
  • Voice normal or "wet"

Functional swallowing- there are changes that do not compromise safe feeding as reduced sensitivity (intra-oral or facial), anterior escape due to small anatomical or functional changes Mild dysphagia- multiple swallowing, inadequate laryngeal elevation, "wet" voice but cough reflex efficient Moderate dysphagia- multiple swallowing, inadequate laryngeal elevation, "wet" voice, weak cough reflex and gagging one or more consistencies Severe dysphagia- when there is no evidence of coughing, swallowing reflexes or gagging difficult to recover

5 days (before and immediately after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Klayne C Matos, MD, Hospital Geral de Fortaleza

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

Turn the study public to contribute to the science around the world, by publishing results and share knowledge to future researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Ischemic

Clinical Trials on Functional Electrical Stimulation

3
Subscribe