Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children

September 2, 2018 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Restoring Untreated and SDF-treated Dentine Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth of Preschool Children

The primary objective of this proposed clinical study is to compare the success rates of ART restorations placed in untreated and SDF-treated dentine caries lesions in primary teeth. The secondary objective is to describe the change in parents' satisfaction with the aesthetics of their child's teeth and the change in oral health-related quality of life of preschool children before and after placement of ART restorations.

The study population is preschool children attending kindergartens in different districts in Hong Kong. Children attending grades 1 or 2 in nine kindergartens were invited to receive a free dental examination and had their decayed primary teeth restored, if possible, in the kindergarten by dentists. Parental informed consent was obtained before the dental examination and treatment. Half of the children with decayed primary teeth needing restorations were assigned randomly to receive SDF treatment around 10 weeks before receiving the restoration. The restored teeth were re-examined every 6 months for 24 months to assess the treatment outcome. Parents of the study children were asked to complete a questionnaire at baseline, 6 months and 24 months so as to obtain data on their satisfaction with the aesthetics of their child's teeth and the oral health-related quality of life of the study children.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study population of this proposed study is Hong Kong preschool children. Children attending grade 1 or 2 in nine selected kindergartens were invited to join this study. An invitation letter with information on the purpose and procedures of the study was sent to the parents of the children through the kindergarten. The parents were asked to give written consent for allowing their child to receive a free oral examination and ART restorations, if indicated for treating the decayed primary teeth in their child's mouth, provided by dentists in the kindergarten. Parental consent were obtained before inclusion of a child in this study.

Cavitated caries lesions in the primary teeth of the study children were restored following the ART procedures (Holmgren et al., 2013). The instruments used were LED illuminated dental mirror, sickle probe, tweezers, hatchet, excavators and flat plastic. The dental restorative material used was a high-strength chemical-cured glass ionomer (Ketac-molar, 3M ESPE, Germany).

At the baseline, all children with parental consent were clinically examined in the kindergarten. Disposable dental mirror attached to a handle with an intra-oral LED light and a ball-ended probe was used. The status of each tooth was recorded. Children who had at least one decayed primary tooth with a cavity into dentine were included into the study. All decayed teeth in the children were restored, except those with inadequate access and those with signs of pulpal pathology. The decayed teeth in half of the children received topical application of a SDF solution (Saforide, Toyo Chemical, Japan), through simple random allocation on a child basis using random numbers, around 10 weeks before receiving the restoration. The time used for placement of each restoration was recorded to the nearest minute.

The children were examined at 6 and will be examined at 12, 18 and 24 months after placement of ART restorations by calibrated examiners who were not involved in the placement of the restorations. The same instruments used in the baseline examination were used in the follow-up examinations. The status of the restorations and restored teeth were assessed and recorded using codes and criteria commonly adopted in previous clinical studies of ART restorations (Lo et al., 2007).

At baseline, information on the children's oral hygiene practice, snacking habit, oral health related quality of life, and parental satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth was collected by a self-completed questionnaire. A validated tool for measuring oral health related quality of life of preschool children in Hong Kong, Chinese version of Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS), was used (Lee et al., 2009). The same measurement tool was used at the 6-month and will be used at 24-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

195

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, China
        • The University of Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • generally healthy children who had at least one decayed primary tooth with a cavity into dentine

Exclusion Criteria:

  • children with serious systemic diseases/conditions or who were uncooperative during treatment
  • teeth with signs of pulpal pathology such as having an abscess or discoloured
  • caries lesions which did not have adequate access for hand instruments to prepare the cavity for a filling and those that were treated with SDF solution but with most parts still being active

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: SDF treated
application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution
SDF solution was painted onto the surface of the carious lesion of the tooth
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
application of a placebo (tonic water)
tonic water was painted onto the surface of the carious lesion of the tooth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success of the ART restorations
Time Frame: 24 months
A restoration is classified as success when it is retained on the tooth without major defects or wear and has no associated active caries.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
parental satisfaction with aesthetics of their child's teeth as reported in the parent's answer to a question on their satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth
Time Frame: 24 months
parent's answer to a question on their satisfaction with the appearance of their child's teeth. The question is "How satisfied are you with the overall appearance of your child's teeth?" The answer option is a 5-point scale with 5 being very satisfied, 4 being satisfied, 3 being neutral, 2 being dissatisfied, and 1 being very dissatisfied.
24 months
oral health related quality of life of the child as assessed by the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
parents' answers to a series of questions in the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale. This scale contains 13 self-completed questions on various aspects of the impact of child oral health on the daily activities of the child or the family. The answer in each question is on a 5-point scale with 0 being no impact and 4 being great impact. The scale score is the summation of the answer scores to the 13, which can range from 0 to 52. The higher the scale score, the more impacts of oral health on life activities and thus lower quality of life.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW 17-180

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Clinical Trials on application of 38% silver diamine fluoride solution

3
Subscribe