Iron Parameters in Non-anemic First Trimester Gravidas

June 25, 2019 updated by: Michael Auerbach MD, Auerbach Hematology Oncology Associates P C
The purpose of the study is to see the percentage of non-anemic, first trimester gravidas presenting to their obstetricians, who are iron deficient.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The 2015 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) stated "there is insufficient evidence to recommend the routine screening for iron deficiency in non-anemic gravidas". The basis for this recommendation is the lack maternal or fetal outcome data in this population. To date, there are no guidelines for the treatment of non-anemic, iron deficiency pregnancy women with or without anemia. Obstetricians and gynecologists often do not screen for iron deficiency unless the mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is reduced even in the presence of a reduced hemoglobin. Iron deficiency occurs prior to a decrement in hemoglobin concentration, followed by a decrease in the MCV which occurs after. Subsequently, if these recommendation are followed up to 50% of iron deficient pregnant women remain undiagnosed.

While prospective studies may be absent proving that routine screening and supplementation is beneficial, there is ample evidence that iron deficiency in mothers and infants results in significant morbidity, even in the absence of anemia. Fetal, neonatal and childhood brain growth and development require iron, with deficiencies resulting with adverse effects on myelination, neurotransmitter synthesis and brain programming. There is a two-fold incidence of preterm birth, three-fold increase in low birth weight and small for gestational age infants. In addition to negative effects on the fetus, maternal iron deficiency is associated with an increased risk for caesarean delivery, transfusion, perinatal bleeding, pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, poor wound healing, cardiac failure and even death. Of note, using existing guidelines infants are not screened for iron deficiency even if they are at high risk (preterm, infants of diabetic mothers, smokers or those with intrauterine growth restriction.

Published evidence suggests that when iron deficiency is present later in pregnancy in the mother, adequate iron delivery to the fetus does not occur. In a prospective study of 2400 urban women with iron deficiency in the second and third trimesters, while supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in maternal hemoglobin concentrations and iron parameters, over 45% of infants were iron deficient at birth.

Subsequently, while prospective studies are lacking supporting routine screening and iron supplementation, high quality published evidence imputing a litany of morbid events associated with iron deficiency, calls into question the recommendations of the USPSTF. Until such evidence is available based on the preponderance of evidence supporting absence of harm with either screening or supplementation we believe all gravidas presenting to their obstetricians should be screened for iron deficiency.

We propose a prospective observation study of one hundred consecutive, non-selected, non-anemic, first trimester pregnant women to have iron parameters added to their routine laboratory tests. While we realize this is not standard, many practices already have adopted this screening process. We intend to redact all demographic patient information and expect to incur no uncovered costs. As a result we believe neither investigational review board or informed consent is necessary. In hundreds of patients so screened we have encountered no insurance pushback. The additional tests will include only serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), percent transferrin saturation (Fe/TIBC) and serum ferritin. The data will be stratified by parity.

We anticipate to find an incidence of iron deficiency of 30-40% based on either a low TSAT or low serum ferritin. Such a finding should motivate properly powered, prospective outcome analyses supporting a new paradigm that incorporating the low cost screening for iron deficiency accompany standard screening tests at the beginning of pregnancy irrespective of the presence or absence of anemia.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

102

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21237
        • Auerbach Hematology and Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women presenting to their obstetricians

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant in first trimester
  • Non-anemic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anemia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
First trimester pregnant women
Serum iron, total iron binding capacity, TSAT (Fe/TIBC), serum ferritin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Non-anemic Patients With Iron Deficiency Stratified by Gravidity
Time Frame: Day 1 presentation to obstetrician
Either low serum ferritin or low percent transferrin saturation (TSAT)
Day 1 presentation to obstetrician

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 24, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 25, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pregnancy

Clinical Trials on Iron parameters

3
Subscribe