Median and Paramedian Approach in Spinal Anesthesia

January 26, 2022 updated by: Seyfi KARTAL, MD, Trabzon Kanuni Education and Research Hospital

Evaluation of Median and Paramedian Approach in Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is frequently used as anesthesia in many surgeries such as lower abdominal, inguinal, urogenital, rectal and lower extremities.

Conventional median approach (MA) is preferred more frequently, although MA or paramedian approach (PA) is used in SA. Especially in geriatric patients due to degenerative changes Although we are told that degenerative changes are less affected in PA during SA in the geriatric age group, few studies have been conducted on the subject and we aimed to evaluate the superiority of the two methods.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In our study, 100 cases were planned to be evaluated prospectively. Patients scheduled for surgery under spinal anesthesia will undergo routine spinal preparation. After routine motorization, patients will be treated with MA or PA.

MA will be performed in a conventional manner and PA will be performed by adding 1 cm lateral and 1 cm caudal from the planned vertebral space to 10-15 degree medial and cephal.

If one of the patients with MA or PA fails, despite three attempts, the other method will be tried by another specialist. If the procedure fails or there are not enough blocks, a different anesthesia method will be applied.

The data of the patients included in the study were evaluated by a different researcher other than the SA physician; demographic data of the cases, type of operation, MA or PA in SA and the number of repeated attempts / trials for the procedure will be evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yomra, Turkey, 61500
        • TRABZON

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

68 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients older than 70 years
  • elective surgery under spinal anesthesia
  • those who agreed to participate in the study
  • Those with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1-3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • who use opioid or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs regularly
  • who are allergic to a drug used in the study
  • had contraindications for spinal anesthesia,
  • drug addiction
  • obese patients (Body Mass Index ≥ 35)
  • migraine and chronic headache
  • Spinal anesthesia can not be performed in more than 3 trials, but passed to the general anesthesia
  • those who do not agree to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: median approach
Spinal anesthesia will be performed with a conventional median approach
spinal anesthesia with median approach; is the known classical method and it is aimed to reach the spinal area from the middle line.
Other Names:
  • classical approach
In spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach, 1 cm lateral and 1 cm caudal to reach the spinal area.
Active Comparator: paramedian approach
Spinal anesthesia will be applied with a paramedian approach.
spinal anesthesia with median approach; is the known classical method and it is aimed to reach the spinal area from the middle line.
Other Names:
  • classical approach
In spinal anesthesia with a paramedian approach, 1 cm lateral and 1 cm caudal to reach the spinal area.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
spinal needle touches the spinal bone
Time Frame: during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
The ability of getting a successful spinal anesthesia with a single skin puncture and no needle redirection.
during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
Number of repeated attempts (attempts):
Time Frame: during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
The ability of getting a successful spinal anesthesia with a single skin puncture and no needle redirection.
during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
duration of procedure
Time Frame: during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
In spinal anesthesia, the time to reach the skin and the spinal area will be evaluated.
during the procedure of spinal anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of spinal needle insertion
Time Frame: during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
The ability of getting a successful spinal anesthesia with a single skin puncture regardless of needle redirection.
during the procedure of spinal anesthesia
Complications of the procedure
Time Frame: during the procedure of spinal anesthesia and 1 week after spinal anesthesia
complications of spinal anesthesia will be evaluated, during spinal anesthesia and during the first week
during the procedure of spinal anesthesia and 1 week after spinal anesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hülya Kılıç Yılmaz, Trabzon Kanuni Eğitim araştırma Hastanesi

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

February 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

stated that the personal data will not be shared in the participant consent form in the study design.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Efficacy, Self

Clinical Trials on median approach

3
Subscribe