- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03776162
A Comparison of ACL Repair With BEAR Device vs. Autograft Patellar Tendon ACL Reconstruction (BEAR-MOON)
April 24, 2023 updated by: Kurt Spindler, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
BEAR - MOON: A Two Arm Non-Inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing ACL Repair With BEAR Device vs. Autograft Patellar Tendon ACL Reconstruction
This study is designed to evaluate bridge-enhanced ACL restoration (BEAR), a new surgical technique for repairing knees injured by a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) that promotes reattachment and healing of the ACL using a blood-enriched implant.
BEAR will be compared to bone to patellar tendon to bone autograft (BPTB) reconstruction, a standard ACL surgical reconstruction technique that replaces a torn portion of the ACL with transplanted patellar tendon tissue, and thus requires additional invasive patellar tendon removal and reuse as a portion of the ACL surgery, in a two group randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which participants will have equal chance of receiving BEAR or BPTB reconstruction.
The BEAR technique is FDA approved and involves surgically placing a sponge (the BEAR implant) between the torn ends of the ACL, providing an absorbable implant for the ligament ends to grow into.
The investigators hypothesize that the ACL repair with BEAR technology will achieve results not appreciably worse than BPTB reconstruction, with a reduced burden of invasive surgery, when assessed over the first two post-operative years.
Animal studies suggest BEAR may also ameliorate longer-term premature osteoarthritis of the knee, a common consequence of ACL reconstruction surgery.
However, no human data yet support that, and this trial will conclude before such a benefit can be observed.
All patients 18-55 years of age who are candidates for ACL surgery within 50 days of the ACL injury and who present to surgeons participating in the study will be offered participation in the trial.
Patients will be randomized and will undergo specified rehabilitation protocols post-operatively with primary assessments of knee laxity and patient reported measures at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
The study population will include active and otherwise healthy patients of both genders, all races, and between 18-55 years old at any of six locations, who elect to undergo primary surgery for a torn ACL within 50 days of injury.
Approximately 100 patients will receive each of the experimental BEAR surgery and the comparative control BPTB reconstruction surgery, with each group distributed similarly across the six medical centers where the trial is being conducted: Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University, Ohio State University, Rhode Island Hospital/University Orthopedics, and University of Colorado .
The study intervention uses a BEAR implant, which is placed between the torn ends of the ruptured ACL.
The BEAR implant is resorbed over 4 to 8 weeks, during which period it promotes repair of the ACL tissue in the gap between the torn ends.
The device provides a stable provisional sponge to facilitate intra-articular repair of the torn ACL ligament, where without the implant device, healing does not occur.
The results of this BEAR procedure will be compared against ACL reconstruction using a BPTB autograft.
This technique consists of removing the torn ACL tissue, harvesting patellar tendon, and grafting that tendon within tunnels in the bone to reconstruct or replace the torn ACL.
The study duration is five years.
Surgery will occur at most 50 days after the patient's ACL is torn, with two year follow-up and a three month window for the final follow-up examination, for a maximum enrollment period for each patient of approximately 2 years and five months (29 months).
Randomization will occur during the surgery, and patients will be informed of their treatments at conclusion of their participation.
The two research time points are 1 and 2 years, when assessments will be conducted by an independent examiner masked to the type of surgery the patient received.
With the exception of the RCT consenting process, use of the BEAR implant, and the blinded assessment process, clinical care will be standard practice following surgical treatment for a torn ACL.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
200
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Carrie B Melgaard, MS
- Phone Number: (216)318-9094
- Email: melgaac@ccf.org
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80309
- Recruiting
- University of Colorado
-
Contact:
- Peyton Carter
- Email: PEYTON.CARTER@CUANSCHUTZ.EDU
-
-
Minnesota
-
Bloomington, Minnesota, United States, 55431
- Recruiting
- TRIA Orthopaedics Center/ University of Minnesota
-
Principal Investigator:
- Bradley Nelson, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Marc Tompkins, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Joel Boyd, MD
-
Contact:
- Andrea Lange
- Phone Number: 952-806-5329
- Email: triaresearch@tria.com
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Recruiting
- Cleveland Clinic
-
Contact:
- Brian Strippy
- Phone Number: 216-518-3491
- Email: strippb@ccf.org
-
Principal Investigator:
- Kurt P Spindler, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Lutul Farrow, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Salvatore Frangiamore, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Paul Saluan, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Michael Scarcella, MD
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43202
- Recruiting
- Ohio State University
-
Contact:
- Tabitha Pontious
- Phone Number: 614-366-0854
- Email: Tabitha.Pontious@osumc.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Christopher Kaeding, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- David Flanigan, MD
-
-
Rhode Island
-
Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
- Recruiting
- University Orthopedics Institute/ Rhode Island Hospital
-
Principal Investigator:
- Brett Owens, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Paul Fadale, MD
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Michael Hulstyn, MD
-
Contact:
- Cyndi Chrostek
- Phone Number: 401-444-4164
- Email: bear.trial@lifespan.org
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Recruiting
- Vanderbilt University
-
Contact:
- Rosemary Sanders
- Phone Number: 615-322-7121
- Email: rosemary.a.sanders@vumc.org
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Richard Wright, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 55 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
INCLUSION CRITERIA
In order to be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
- 18-55 years of age
- Complete ACL tear as confirmed by MRI
- Selected surgical treatment of ACL injury
- Believed to be a surgical candidate for ACL reconstruction by treating physician
- Time from injury to surgery is ≤50 days
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures for the duration of the study, including lifestyle, activity, and sports restrictions
- Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
EXCLUSION CRITERIA AT PRE-OPERATIVE EXAM
An individual who meets any of the following criteria, either during a pre-operative exam or during intraoperative arthroscopic evaluation, will be excluded from participation in this study:
- Any prior ACL surgery on affected knee (simple arthroscopy for plica, debris removal, or diagnosis is accepted)
- Any prior ACL surgery on unaffected knee (simple arthroscopy for plica, debris removal, diagnosis or partial meniscectomy is accepted)
- Confirmed or suspected contralateral ACL tear
- ACL tear found to be only partial and the treating physician feels it does not require surgery because it is "stable"
- Diagnosis of posterolateral corner injury (complete lateral collateral ligament tear, biceps femoris tendon avulsion, arcuate ligament tear, popliteus ligament tear) that requires concurrent or staged surgical treatment
- Diagnosis of Grade 3 medial collateral injury that requires concurrent or staged surgery
- Insufficient ACL tissue on MRI
- Diagnosis of complete patellar dislocation
- Diagnosis of complete patellar tendon or quadriceps tear
- Obesity with a BMI ≥45
- Does not speak or understand English
- Daily smoking (occasional or social use is accepted if smoking ≤ 3 days/ week and ≤ 5 cigarettes/day)
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Inability to take oral medications
- Use of intra-articular corticosteroids in the affected knee within last 6 months
- Chronic use of corticosteroids for treatment of an autoimmune disorder such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, etc. (maintenance or rescue inhaler for asthma is allowed)
- History of prior infection in knee
- History of chemotherapy treatment
- History of sickle cell disease
- History of anaphylaxis
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could affect healing (e.g., diabetes, inflammatory arthritis, etc.)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Known allergic reactions to meat products or collagen
- Known allergy to bovine collagen, bovine gelatin, or other bovine products
- Known adverse reaction to any bovine product
- Febrile illness within 7 days
- Treatment with another investigational drug or other intervention, either concurrently or previously, that would interfere with surgical healing
EXCLUSION CRITERIA AT INTRAOPERATIVE ARTHROSCOPIC EVALUATION
- Time from injury to surgery has exceeded 50 days
- No ACL tear found upon arthroscopic inspection
- ACL tear found to be only partial, with normal pivot shift and endpoint, and does not require surgery
- Displaced bucket handle meniscal injury requiring repair
- Diagnosis of full-thickness chondral injury of Grade 3 or 4, or that requires more than microfracture (i.e., osteochondral autograft transplant), on either condyle
- Unrecognized lateral or medial sided Grade 3 ligamentous injury that requires concurrent or staged surgery
- Tibial stump length is < 1cm
- Tibial footprint attachment is < 50% intact
- Any other reason the ACL stump should be deemed irreparable (e.g., tissue quality too poor to hold suture)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: ACL Reconstruction(BPTB Graft)
Procedure/Surgery ACL Reconstruction (Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft): Standard of care surgical procedure Patellar Tendon Autograft ACL reconstruction, in which a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft from the front of the knee is taken to replace the torn ACL.
|
Standard of care procedure Patellar Tendon Autograft ACL reconstruction, in which a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft from the front of the knee is taken to replace the torn ACL.
|
Experimental: Bridge Enhanced ACL Restoration
Procedure/Surgery Bridge Enhanced ACL Restoration (BEAR): The surgical repair of the ACL using the BEAR technique involves surgically placing a sponge (the BEAR implant) between the torn ends of the ACL, providing a sponge for the ligament ends to group into.
|
The BEAR technique involves surgically placing a sponge (the BEAR implant) between the torn ends of the ACL, providing a sponge for the ligament ends to group into.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
KT-1000
Time Frame: KT-1000 instrumented knee laxity measure 2 years after surgery (difference from contralateral knee)
|
Co-primary Outcome measure: Knee stability or the antero-posterior (AP) knee laxity will be determined using a KT-1000 arthrometer at the 30lb force setting on both knees of the subject at 6 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery.
The primary endpoint will be 2 year KT-1000.
Both left and right knees will be covered with a sleeve so the trained examiner cannot tell which the operated knee is or which procedure the patient had.
Values for both knees will be recorded.
For knee laxity 2.5 mm in the side-to-side difference measurements will be taken as the non-inferiority margin for the 2 year post-operative comparison of patients in the bridge-enhanced repair group and the ACL reconstruction groups.Testing will be performed by experienced, certified athletic trainers, physical therapists or physician assistants trained using standardized equipment according to the MOON protocol.
|
KT-1000 instrumented knee laxity measure 2 years after surgery (difference from contralateral knee)
|
IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) Score
Time Frame: Validated Patient Reported IKDC Subjective Score Instrument 2 years after surgery (change from baseline)
|
The IKDC patient-reported outcome measure instrument will be completed by patients pre-operatively, then at 3 and 6 months, 1 year and at the final 2 year visit after surgery.
The primary endpoint will be evaluated at 2 years.
The IKDC non-inferiority margin for BEAR vs. autograft patellar tendon will be set at <16 points.
The IKDC is a patient reported outcome measure which contains sections on knee symptoms (7 items), function (2 items), and sports activities (2 items).
Scores range from 0 points (lowest level of function or highest level of symptoms) to 100 points (highest level of function and lowest level of symptoms).
|
Validated Patient Reported IKDC Subjective Score Instrument 2 years after surgery (change from baseline)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time Frame: Validated Patient Reported KOOS Subjective Score Instrument 2 years after surgery
|
The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) is a patient-reported outcome measurement instrument to assess the patient's opinion about their knee and associated problems.
The KOOS evaluates both short and long-term consequences of knee injury and primary osteoarthritis.
It is a validated patient-reported outcomes measure to be administered by the research coordinator at the same time points as the IKDC (preoperatively, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years).
There are 5 subscales (Pain, Symptoms, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Sports and Recreation, and Knee related Quality of life).
The minimum clinically relevant difference is 8 points on a 100 point scale for each of the five subscales.The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questions.
Standardized answer options are given and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
|
Validated Patient Reported KOOS Subjective Score Instrument 2 years after surgery
|
MARX Activity (Marx Activity Rating Scale)
Time Frame: MARX Activity 2 years after surgery
|
The Marx Activity Scale is a validated patient-reported measure to be administered by the research coordinator to the patient preoperatively and at 1 and 2 years post-operatively.
MARX focuses on four activity points: running, deceleration, cutting (changing directions while running), and pivoting.
Patients are asked to indicate approximately how many times in the past 12 months they performed each of the activities while at their healthiest and most active state.
The four knee functions are rated on a 5-point scale of frequency and scores are added up to a maximum of 16 points with a higher score indicating more frequent participation.
The MARX rating scale is not based on participation in specific sporting activities.
Instead, patients are asked about different components of physical function (e.g., running and pivoting) that are common to different sports.
|
MARX Activity 2 years after surgery
|
Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS)
Time Frame: AKPS 2 years after surgery
|
The AKPS is a validated patient-reported outcomes measure to be administered by the research coordinator to patients at the same time points as the IKDC (preoperatively, 3 and 6 months, 1 and 2 years).
This tool is designed to measure patellofemoral pain symptoms.
The BEAR-MOON study will utilize the 6-item short version (walking, squatting, jumping, pain, swelling, abnormal kneecap movements).
Minimum score is 0 points (most painful) and maximum score is 100 points (no pain).
|
AKPS 2 years after surgery
|
Quadriceps Strength Testing
Time Frame: Quadriceps Strength 2 years after surgery
|
Measurement of quadriceps strength on both knees will be performed at 6 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery using a hand held dynamometer.
Both sides will be covered with a sleeve so the blinded examiner cannot tell which the knee was the operated knee or which procedure was performed.
Values for both knees will be recorded.
|
Quadriceps Strength 2 years after surgery
|
Hop Test Limb Difference
Time Frame: Hop Test Limb Difference 2 years after surgery
|
Hop functional testing will be performed by a trained physical therapist or athletic trainer on a strict protocol as performed and published by MOON.
This will be performed at 6 month, 1 and 2 years.
The measurement of interest is the difference between hop distances using the normal leg and ACL injured leg.
Single leg hop tests are a method to determine ability to return to high-level athletics following knee surgery.
They are commonly used during the return to function phase in an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation protocol to assess the functional stability of the knee
|
Hop Test Limb Difference 2 years after surgery
|
Active Knee Range of Motion
Time Frame: Active Knee Range of Motion 2 years after surgery
|
Range of motion will be measured using a goniometer.
Both sides will be covered with a sleeve so the licensed examiner cannot tell which the knee was the operated knee or which procedure was performed.
Values for both knees will be recorded.
|
Active Knee Range of Motion 2 years after surgery
|
Lachman Testing
Time Frame: Lachman Testing 2 years after surgery
|
The Lachman Test will be measured by a blinded examiner at 6 months, 1 year and at the final 2 year visit after surgery.
Both knees will be covered with a sleeve in order to keep the assessor blinded to the operative knee and which procedure was performed.
The Lachman test is used to identify the integrity of the ACL.
|
Lachman Testing 2 years after surgery
|
Number of Participants with Knee Infection
Time Frame: Knee Infection 2 years after surgery
|
Infection is defined as a return to the operating room for a washout of the knee; intravenous (IV) antibiotics to treat the infection.
|
Knee Infection 2 years after surgery
|
Number of Participants with Treatment Failure
Time Frame: Treatment Failure 2 years after surgery
|
Treatment failure will include re-injury; knee laxity >6mm without re-injury; MRI confirmation of graft tear; or a physical examination that proves a graft tear.
|
Treatment Failure 2 years after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kurt P Spindler, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- BEAR-MOON; Vega JF, Strnad GJ, Briskin I, Cox CL, Farrow LD, Fadale P, Flanigan D, Hulstyn M, Imrey PB, Kaeding CC, Owens BD, Saluan P, Wright R, Yen YM, Spindler KP. Interrater Agreement of an Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Classification System. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Dec 3;8(12):2325967120966323. doi: 10.1177/2325967120966323. eCollection 2020 Dec.
- BEAR-MOON Design Group; Spindler KP, Imrey PB, Yalcin S, Beck GJ, Calbrese G, Cox CL, Fadale PD, Farrow L, Fitch R, Flanigan D, Fleming BC, Hulstyn MJ, Jones MH, Kaeding C, Katz JN, Kriz P, Magnussen R, McErlean E, Melgaard C, Owens BD, Saluan P, Strnad G, Winalski CS, Wright R. Design Features and Rationale of the BEAR-MOON (Bridge-Enhanced ACL Restoration Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network) Randomized Clinical Trial. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 25;10(1):23259671211065447. doi: 10.1177/23259671211065447. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 30, 2021
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2025
Study Completion (Anticipated)
September 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 13, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
December 14, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 26, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 24, 2023
Last Verified
April 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- G180167
- R01AR074131-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The public will have access to the published results of the NIH funded research.
Scientists will be required to submit final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts that arise from NIH funds to the digital archive PubMed Central upon acceptance for publication.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Per National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS) policy, 2 years after posting of study results.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
This study will comply with the NIH Data Sharing Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- CSR
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear
-
Taipei Hospital, Ministry of Health and WelfareRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Posterior Cruciate Ligament TearTaiwan
-
University of Colorado, DenverChildren's Hospital ColoradoRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnalysis of Radiological Features of Lateral Femoral Impaction Fracture / Lateral Femoral Notch SignAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearPoland
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearPoland
-
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited Kingdom
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearSweden
-
Bahçeşehir UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearTurkey
-
University of BathVersus ArthritisRecruitingPost-traumatic Osteoarthritis | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionUnited Kingdom
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
Clinical Trials on ACL Reconstruction (Bone Patellar Tendon Bone Graft)
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearSweden
-
National Institute of Rehabilitation, MexicoRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureMexico
-
University of CalgaryWorkers' Compensation Board, AlbertaActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Chronic Instability of Knee | Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate LigamentCanada
-
Indonesia UniversityCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Sports Injury
-
Brian WaltersCompletedPost Operative PainUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliCompletedOsteoarthritis, Knee | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearItaly
-
Universidad de GranadaCompletedKnee Injuries and DisordersSpain
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentAtaturk University; Kutahya Health Sciences University; Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureTurkey
-
Lars KonradsenUnknown
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesBrazil