Preoperative Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse

November 16, 2020 updated by: Barbara Bodner-Adler, Medical University of Vienna

Preoperative Locally Applied Oestrogen in Postmenopausal Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Changes in Subjective and Objective Outcome - a Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study

Introduction With increasing age the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) rises and will increase substantially in the future according to forecasting studies. It is possible that oestrogens, alone or in combination with other forms of therapy, may assist in the management of POP by increasing collagen synthesis and thereby improving the strength of the weakened vaginal epithelium. Yet, studies investigating the effect of topical oestrogen and its impact on POP associated symptoms, both self-reported improvement and observations of objective improvement, are lacking.

Objective To evaluate the subjective efficacy concerning prolapse associated complaints measured by the German pelvic floor questionnaire (domain POP: POP-score) after preoperative use of local oestrogen compared to preoperative placebo treatment in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Further variables of interest are POP-score after 3 months, differences regarding the objective prolapse quantification system (POP-Q), surgical outcome and tissue operability assessed by the surgeon.

Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study the investigators aim to include 120 postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and indicated operative procedure. An analysis of covariance will be computed with the depending variable POP-score after 6 weeks and the independent variables group (verum versus placebo) and Pop-Score at baseline.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tulln, Austria, 3430
        • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tulln
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Department of General Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology of the Medical University Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal women
  • Able to read, understand and sign informed consent
  • Able to apply a vaginal cream
  • Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse with planned and indicated prolapse surgical repair

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicion or history of breast cancer or other oestrogen responsive malignancies (endometrial cancer)
  • unexplained abnormal vaginal bleeding
  • history of deep vein thrombosis
  • inherited or acquired blood clotting disorders (eg, APC resistance, Antithrombin III deficiency)
  • transient ischaemic attack, myo- cardial infarction or ischaemic heart disease
  • Hypersensitivity to oestrogen
  • Unable to read and sign informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Linoladiol Estradiol
Linoladiol Estradiol cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse

Linoladiol Estradiol Initial dose (week 1): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) every 48 hours the following week.

Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application (2g Linoladiol = 0.2mg Estradiol) twice per week the following 4 weeks.

Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks

Other Names:
  • Montavit ATC Code G03CA03
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo cream 6 weeks before surgery of pelvic organ prolapse

Initial dose (week 1): 1 application every day for the first week Maintenance dose 1 (week 2) : 1 application every 48 hours the following week.

Maintenance dose 2 (week 3-6): 1 application twice per week the following 4 weeks.

Route of administration: intravaginally by means of a calibrated applicator before retiring at night Duration: 6 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
subjective prolapse associated symptoms (measured with the validated German pelvic floor questionnaire)
Time Frame: change from baseline POP Score at 6 weeks after treatment
treatment efficacy of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen in postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse in comparison to placebo, measured by a subjective questionnaire. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome
change from baseline POP Score at 6 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative time in minutes
Time Frame: up to 1 week postoperative
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
up to 1 week postoperative
length of stay in days
Time Frame: up to 1 week postoperative
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
up to 1 week postoperative
intraoperative blood loss in ml
Time Frame: up to 1 week postoperative
effect of preoperative vaginally administered oestrogen on postoperative outcome in comparison to placebo
up to 1 week postoperative
blood circulation of the tissue (good, regular, scarce, no blood circulation)
Time Frame: on day of surgery
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
on day of surgery
separability of the tissue layers (good, regular, scarce, not possible)
Time Frame: on day of surgery
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
on day of surgery
easy separation from the bladder (yes/no)
Time Frame: on day of surgery
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
on day of surgery
easy opening of the Douglas cavity (Yes/no)
Time Frame: on day of surgery
differences in tissue operability between the two groups assessed by means of a questionnaire which is filled in by the surgeon after the operation
on day of surgery
subjective (all domains of the pelvic floor questionnaire) outcome 3 months postoperative
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative
possible differences regarding subjective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. 42 questions. Range 0 to 3 points for each question. Lower values represent a better outcome.
3 months postoperative
objective (POP-Q score) outcome 3 months postoperative
Time Frame: 3 months postoperative
possible differences regarding objective outcome parameters between intervention and placebo-group 3 months after operation. POP-Q Score (Score between 0 and 4). The POP- quantification system consists of six defined points of measurement (Aa, Ba, C,D,Ap,Bp) and three other landmarks (GH,TVL, PB). Each is measured in centimeters above the hymen (negative number) or below the hymen (positive number).
3 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

August 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on Linoladiol Estradiol

3
Subscribe