The Impact of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease in the Real World

June 26, 2023 updated by: Mark Larkin, Vitaccess Ltd
An observational, non-interventional registry study to collect real-world data from people living with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) and its treatment, which will be available to researchers to further the knowledge of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and improve patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The registry uses Vitaccess' digital real-world evidence platform and has been developed in collaboration with CMT experts, Patient Advocacy Organizations (PAOs) and the biopharmaceutical company Pharnext.

Eligible participants install a study app on their smartphone. Researchers access aggregated, anonymised data via a cloud-based research portal.

The platform provides benefits to participants, which it is hoped will encourage persistence with data submission; these include options to download a copy of their symptom diary, a clinically-validated Knowledge feature, and access to high-level results from the study data.

The aggregated data are available in close to real time via "dashboards" and can be analysed according to a number of pre-set criteria (e.g. disease stage, age, geographic location).

State-of-the-art technologies and security policies are used in the platform to ensure industry-standard data storage and privacy for all users. Participants' personally identifiable information will remain confidential at all times, and researchers will not be able to identify individuals.

The study is ethics-approved in all scope countries and led by a Scientific Advisory Board comprising representatives from international PAOs, patients and key opinion leaders from each country, and study leads from both Pharnext Société Anonyme (SA) and Vitaccess Ltd.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults (age >18 years) with any stage and any subtype of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, who are resident in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom (UK) or the USA, so long as they have a National Health Service (NHS) or Community Health Index (CHI) number (or equivalent) and are willing to use their own smartphone / tablet.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

(*) Aged 18 years and over (*) Diagnosed with any stage and any subtype of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (*) Resident in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, or the USA (*) Have a National Health Service (NHS) or Community Health Index (CHI) number, or equivalent (*) Willing to use their own smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

(*) No specific exclusion criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months

The EQ-5D-5L comprises two parts - the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS).

The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each with 5 levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems - i.e., higher scores represent worse health). The digits for 5 dimensions can be combined in a 5-digit number describing the respondent's health state.

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on vertical, visual analogue scale with endpoints labelled 'the best health you can imagine' and 'the worst health you can imagine'. Higher scores represent better self-perceived health.

Throughout study completion, up to 62 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The WLQ measures the impact of CMT on participants' work ability and productivity. The measure comprises 25 items that ask respondents to rate their level of difficulty or ability to perform specific job demands, aggregated into four domains: time management, physical demands, mental-interpersonal demands, and output demands. Domain scores range from 0 to 100 and the recall period is the previous 2 weeks. WLQ domain scores can be converted into an estimate of productivity loss using an algorithm.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The BFI assesses the fatigue severity in patients with CMT. The measure comprises 10 items, although the first item asks about usual fatigue over the past week (with the respondent answering "yes" or "no") and is not included in the overall score. The remaining nine items assess general fatigue within two subscales: fatigue severity (three items), and the impact of fatigue on daily functioning (six items). The measure uses a 10-point numeric rating scale, and a recall period of 24 hours. A global fatigue score can be calculated by averaging all nine items.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 3a and Interference 8a
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months

The PROMIS pain intensity measure includes two items that assess pain intensity over the last 7 days (average and worst pain), and one for pain intensity "right now"; each scores using a 5-point scale. Scores range from 2-10. Higher scores represent worst pain. This measure is generic rather than disease-specific.

The PROMIS pain interference measure assesses the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical and recreational activities, sleep, and enjoyment in life over the last 7 days using a 5-point scale. Scores range from 8-40. Higher scores represent worse interference. This measure is generic rather than disease-specific.

Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Bespoke questionnaire for this study
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Two cramp-specific items were developed for inclusion in the survey, measuring cramp frequency and intensity. The cramp frequency item asks "In the past 7 days, how many days did you experience cramp?" and has five possible responses: had no cramp, 1-2 days, 3-4 days, 5-6 days, every day. The cramp intensity item asks "In the past 7 days, how intense was your cramp at its worst?" and has five possible responses: had no cramp, mild, moderate, severe, very severe. Higher scores on both items represent greater cramp frequency and intensity respectively.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sleep Disturbance 8a
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The PROMIS sleep disturbance measure assesses self-reported perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and restoration associated with sleep over the last 7 days using a 5-point scale. Scores range from 8-40. Higher scores represent worse sleep disturbance. This measure is generic rather than disease-specific.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The FES-I measures the level of concern about falling during social and physical activities inside and outside hte home, whether or not the person actually does the activity. The "usual" level of concern is measured on a four-point Likert scale (1 = not at all concerned to 4 = very concerned), with a time frame of "usual". Scores range from 16-64. Higher scores represent greater concern about falling.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The LEFS evaluates difficulties because of lower limb problems in 20 activities, including work/school activities, hobbies, moving around the home, dressing, lifting, standing, sitting, walking, and running. The level of difficulty is assessed for "today" using a 5-point Likert scale (0 = extreme difficulty or unable to perform activity; 5 = No difficulty). Lower scores represent greater difficulties experience because of lower limb problems.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
QuickDash (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand)
Time Frame: Throughout study completion, up to 62 months
The QuickDash measure uses 11 items to measure physical function and symptoms in people with any or multiple musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Six questions relate to the ability to perform six activities over the last week, ranging from opening a jar, carrying, washing and recreational activities; two questions relate to impact on social and daily activities; two questions ask the person to rate the severity of pain and tingling in the arms, shoulder or hand, and one question relates to the effects of pain on sleep. All questions are rated 1-5 (no difficulty/none/not at all through to unable/extreme difficulty). Scores range from 11-55. Higher scores represent greater difficulties with physical function and symptoms.
Throughout study completion, up to 62 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Aggregated data research dashboards will be available via industry subscriptions or free academic access.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

3
Subscribe