National Snapshot Study Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction (ASBO)

October 24, 2019 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Prospective Nationwide Audit of the Management of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: a Snapshot Study

Over 63-90% of patients develop peritoneal adhesions after abdominal or pelvic surgery. Which makes it the most common complication after abdominal or pelvic surgery. Adhesions comprise a lifelong risk of adhesion related complications.The most frequent emergency complication of adhesion is an episode of adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Over 1 in 5 patients experiences at least 1 episode of ASBO in the 10 years following initial abdominal surgery. Despite the high incidence of ASBO, diagnosis and treatment of an episode of ASBO varies greatly between hospitals and even between doctors. Until now, optimal treatment patterns are unknown. The aim of this study is mapping of care for patients with a suspected episode of ASBO. With the collected data new hypothesis will be generated for the ideal diagnostic and therapeutic workflow for patients with a suspicion of an episode of ASBO.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with a suspicion of ASBO, older than 17 years, can be included in the present snapshot study. Patients with an episode of small bowel obstruction that is certainly not caused by adhesions fall outside of the scope of this study (eg. tumor as cause of SBO).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspicion ASBO
  • Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clear other cause of small bowel obstruction (e.g. tumor, hernia)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CT treatment ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
In how many patients does CT-scan impact initial management of ASBO (i.e. different cause of SBO found, or conservative trial vs. direct surgery)?
February 2021
Diagnostics ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
How many patients in the Netherlands presenting with adhesive small bowel obstruction have a CT-scan in their diagnostic work-up?
February 2021
Timeframe conservative trial ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
How long do Dutch surgeons continue a conservative trial in patients with persistent obstruction who are not clinically deteriorating? Outcome measures will be based on data from the online Case Report Form (CRF).
February 2021
Conservative trial > 72 hours ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
Does continuing a conservative trial for more than 72 hours adverse impact final outcomes? Complications as measured by Clavien-Dindo will be registered and compared between groups.
February 2021
Laparoscopic surgery for ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
How many patients that are surgically treated for ASBO in the Netherlands have laparoscopic surgery?
February 2021
Outcome laparoscopic surgery for ASBO
Time Frame: February 2021
What are the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for ASBO? Days of in hospital stay, postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo) and 90-day readmissions rates will be compared between patients who underwent open or laparoscopic surgery for ASBO.
February 2021

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Richard PG ten Broek, PhD, MD, Radboudumc, departement of surgery

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Adhesions

Clinical Trials on No intervention

3
Subscribe