Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy (EFAPAD)

Effectiveness of Percutaneous Needle Aponeurotomy for Dupuytren's Disease: a Multicenter, Randomised, Non-inferiority Trial, With Surgery as Comparator

The main objective is to investigate if percutaneous needle aponeurotomy is non-inferior to open surgery using aponeurectomy in treatment of flexion contracture due to Dupuytren's disease.

Our hypothesis is that percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has suitable efficacy and safety profile for large application in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease and that it is consequently able to drastically reduce the need of open surgery in this indication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Scientific justification:

Dupuytren's disease is a world-wide musculoskeletal disorder. It consists in fibrosis of the palmar aponeurosis that can induce disabling flexion contracture of the metacarpophalageal or proximal interphalangeal joints. Treatment modalities of flexion contracture include open surgery, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy and collagenase. Collagenase is not available in France. Aponeurectomy, that is also called fasciectomy, is the main open surgical technique, and open surgery is the most frequently used treatment in Dupuytren's disease. Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy is recommended as a nonsurgical treatment for Dupuytren's disease. It is a minimally invasive procedure. Its most largely accepted indication is Dupuytren's disease with metacarpophalageal joint involvement. However, percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has been successful for metacarpophalageal or proximal interphalangeal joint involvement, in nonadvanced and in advanced Dupuytren's disease. A model analysis recently demonstrated that replacing open surgery with percutaneous needle aponeurotomy could save more than 50% of the total hospitalization costs for the disease.

Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy therefore appears as a unique minimally invasive approach for Dupuytren's disease. It could become a valuable alternative to open surgery. The hypothesis is that percutaneous needle aponeurotomy has suitable efficacy and safety profile for large application in the treatment of Dupuytren's disease and that it is consequently able to drastically reduce the need of open surgery in this indication.

Practical procedure:

Patients addressed to the consultation of the hand surgery centers for Dupuytren's disease will be prospectively selected, included, randomized, treated using percutaneous needle aponeurotomy or open surgery within six weeks after randomization, and followed at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment. Assessment of efficacy will be blinded. Assessment of complications will be done by an unblinded assessor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital LARIBOISIERE - Rhumatologie
        • Contact:
      • Paris, France, 75002
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Centre d'Imagerie Médicale Bachaumont Paris Centre
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Hopital LARIBOISIERE - Radiologie
      • Paris, France, 75016
        • Recruiting
        • JOUVENET - Orthopédie, chirurgie de la main et du membre supérieur
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Ascertained Dupuytren disease: palpable fibrotic nodule or cord developed from the palmar aponeurosis, flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal or proximal interphalangeal joint.
  • Presence of at least one flexion contracture of a metacarpophalangeal joint of the hand due to Dupuytren's disease and > or = 20°
  • Written informed consent signed by the patient
  • Patient affiliated to the social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of other musculoskeletal disorders of the hand than Dupuytren's disease: known inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, clinical signs of inflammatory rheumatic disease of the hand, MP or PIP pain at inclusion visit.
  • Previous surgery of the hand to be treated resulting in functional limitation or limitation of finger mobility
  • Any other pathological condition or limited range of motion in the finger to be treated
  • Psychiatric status precluding patient evaluation; vulnerable persons; adults under legal protection order or incompetent, physically or mentally incapable of giving his consent.
  • Pregnant or beastfeeding women
  • Participation in another interventional trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy
It consists in cutting the fibrotic cord due to the disease and responsible for the flexion contracture, with a needle under local anesthesia. The procedure can be repeated as required during the same session. One to three sessions with at least one-week interval are usually sufficient and will be allowed. It will be performed in outpatient setting by a senior physician experienced in the procedure. End of treatment will be considered as the last session of needle aponeurotomy.
It consists in cutting the fibrotic cord due to the disease and responsible for the flexion contracture, with a needle under local anesthesia. The procedure can be repeated as required during the same session. One to three sessions with at least one-week interval are usually sufficient and will be allowed. It will be performed in outpatient setting by a senior physician experienced in the procedure
Active Comparator: Open surgery with limited aponeurectomy
It consists in excision of the fibrotic aponeurosis.It will be performed by hand surgeons under loco-regional anaesthesia during a short hospitalization (1 day stay). Post-operative cares are necessary (analgesics, splint, nursing, physiotherapy). End of surgical treatment will be considered as the removal of the stitches (two weeks after the surgical treatment).
It consists in excision of the fibrotic aponeurosis.It will be performed by hand surgeons under loco-regional anaesthesia during a short hospitalization (1 day stay). Post-operative cares are necessary (analgesics, splint, nursing, physiotherapy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension
Time Frame: at 3 months after treatment
Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment). Baseline will be Metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension the day of the treatment, before any treatment
at 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metacarpophalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Expressed in degrees using clinical goniometry, and patient wearing white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment.
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Main metacarpophalangeal joint contracture during passive extension,
Time Frame: at 36 months after treament
Expressed in degrees, using low energy computed tomography, for blinded assessment (computed tomography imaging will be analysed by a blinded assessor not involved in the treatment).
at 36 months after treament
The clinical success
Time Frame: at 3 months after treament
The clinical success is defined as the reduction of flexum to within 0 to 5° during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, for the main metacarpophalangeal joint); Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment.
at 3 months after treament
The recurrence
Time Frame: at 12, 24 and 36 months after treament
The recurrence is defined as the flexum progression of 20°, during passive extension, using clinical goniometry, after clinical success. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment.
at 12, 24 and 36 months after treament
The interphalangeal joint contractures during passive and active extension
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Expressed in degrees, using clinical goniometry. Patient will wear white opac gloves to ensure blinded assessment.
at 1 week, 1, 3,12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The 70% improvement from baseline of the flexion contracture
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The flexion contracture of each treated joint, during passive extension will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves). - Flexion contracture in degrees using goniometry reported as follows: ray Number; metacarpophalangeal angle; interphalangeal angle
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The active range of motion of metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal treated joints will be assessed by a blinded assessor (Patient will wear white opac gloves).
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The functional limitation using Quick DASH questionnaire
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 100, with highest value indicating highest disability).
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The URAM scale
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The patient will fill out the auto-questionnaire. The blinded assessor will calculate the score (0 to 45, with highest value indicating highest disability).
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The patient satisfaction on a 0-100 mm visual analog scale
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The assessor will ask the patient the following question: "How would you rate satisfaction about the treatment you underwent in the study?" Patients will be asked to mark the level of their satisfaction on a l00-mm, nonhatched VAS scale marked at one end as "not satisfied" and at the other as "completely satisfied''
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The number of secondary and repeated treatments
Time Frame: at 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
The number of secondary or repeated open surgeries and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be recorded by the unblinded assessor.
at 12, 24 and 36 months after treatment
Complications and adverse events for primary treatment
Time Frame: at the treatment time, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months;
The number and the types of complications and adverse events for primary open surgery and first line percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor.
at the treatment time, and at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months;
Complications and adverse events for secondary treatment
Time Frame: at the treatment time, at 12, 24 and 36 months;
The number and the types of complications and adverse events for secondary open surgery and percutaneous needle aponeurotomy will be collected by an unblinded assessor.
at the treatment time, at 12, 24 and 36 months;
The post-interventional pain and needs
Time Frame: at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months
The post-interventional pain and needs of nursing, splinting, medication, physiotherapy,sick leave, time return to regular activities using a patient diary. These datas will be collected by the unblinded assessor.
at 1 week, 1, 3, 12, 24 and 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johann BEAUDREUIL, PUPH, APHP

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 14, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 14, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dupuytren Disease of Finger

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous needle aponeurotomy

3
Subscribe