- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03852147
Individualized Hemodynamic Optimization by Indirect Measurement of the Respiratory Quotient in Major Surgery: Prospective Randomized Multicentre Open-Label Study (OPHIQUE) Individualized Optimization by Indirect Measurement of the Respiratory Quotient (OPHIQUE)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
• Background : The measurement of the inspired / expired fractions in O2 and CO2 is part of the daily monitoring of the intubated-ventilated patient in the operating theater. Changes in EtCO2 may reflect changes in metabolic CO2 production (VCO2), and oxygen extraction from the body (SvO2). The inspired / exhaled oxygen difference is an indirect reflection of the oxygen consumption (VO2). The ratio of VCO2 to VO2 (respiratory quotient (RQ)) is a non-invasive indirect measure of anaerobic metabolism of the patient, and an indirect reflection of tissue perfusion.
Some studies, including a recent one carried out by our center, showed that the RQ was linked to the appearance of anaerobic metabolism and to the postoperative evolution of the patient. The RQ was correlated with arterial lactate levels and predicted the occurrence of postoperative complications. Thus, the RQ can be a reliable, continuous, non-invasive marker of anaerobic metabolism in the operating room and therefore of the adequacy of arterial oxygen Transport (TaO2) with respect to the VO2 of the patient
- Purpose : Th investigators hypothesize that a hemodynamic optimization in major surgery individualized by non-invasive continuous measurement of the RQ would optimize TaO2 more specifically by informing us about the installation of a VO2 dependence, and therefore of an anaerobic metabolism.
- Brief summary:
The measurement of the inspired / expired fractions in O2 and CO2 is part of the daily monitoring of the intubated-ventilated patient in the operating theater. The ratio of VCO2 to VO2 (respiratory quotient (RQ)) is a non-invasive indirect measure of anaerobic metabolism of the patient, and an indirect reflection of tissue perfusion. We hypothesize that a hemodynamic optimization in major surgery individualized by non-invasive continuous measurement of the RQ would optimize TaO2 more specifically by informing us about the installation of a VO2 dependence, and therefore of an anaerobic metabolism. Patients are randomized in 2 groups : Control group: hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of Systolic Voume (SV) by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary. Experimental group: perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine. Primary and secondary outcomes are recorded 1,2,7 and 30 days after the surgery.
Number of groups and description of groups :
2 groups Control group: hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of SV by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary.
Experimental group: perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine.
• Interventions : Control group: hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of SV by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary.
Experimental group: perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine.
The primary outcome is defined by at least one organ failure within 7 days postoperatively.
The duration of participation of each patient is 30 days and total research term is 49 months
- Number of subjects : 350
- Statistical analysis : The null hypothesis will be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis (there is a difference) using a test of χ2 or a Fisher test according to the frequency of the complications with a risk of the first bilateral species of 5%.
- Key-words : respiratory quotient, post opérative complications, anaerobic metabolism.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amiens, France, 80054
- BAR
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Abdominal, orthopedic or vascular surgery with general anesthesia
- ASA score ≥ II
- Estimated duration of surgery> 2 hours
- Consent signed.
- Affiliation to a social security scheme
Exclusion Criteria:
- Untreated or unbalanced severe hypertension under treatment.
- Preoperative renal failure dialyzed.
- Acute heart failure.
- Acute coronary insufficiency.
- Vascular surgery with kidney plasty.
- Cardiac surgery.
- Permanent laparoscopy.
- Preoperative shock state.
- Refusal of patient's participation
- Pregnant woman, parturient or breastfeeding.
- Patient under guardianship or trusteeship, under the protection of justice or private public law.
- Anesthesia with loco-regional anesthesia (spinal anesthesia and epidural).
- Acute respiratory distress syndrome (PaO2 / FiO2 ratio <300).
- Chronic Respiratory Failure with Home Oxygen Therapy.
- Patient already included in another therapeutic trial with an experimental molecule.
- Emergency anesthesia
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Control group
hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of SV by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary.
|
Control group: hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of SV by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary. Experimental group: perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine. |
Experimental: Experimental group
perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine.
|
Control group: hemodynamic management of patients is done according to usual practices by maintenance of blood pressure by norepinephrine as well as optimization of SV by vascular filling and use of dobutamine if necessary. Experimental group: perioperative hemodynamic management is based on an algorithm that includes RQ measurement and includes volume expansion, norepinephrine, FiO2 enhancement, RBC transfusion and dobutamine. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
organ failure
Time Frame: 7 days postoperatively
|
at least one organ failure within 7 days postoperatively.
• Organ failure is defined according to the recommendations of the European Anesthesia Society (ESA) and the European Resuscitation Society (ESICM).
|
7 days postoperatively
|
mortality rate at day 30
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
the length of stay in the hospital
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
total volume of fluid intraoperatively
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Plasma creatinine measured on day 0, day 1, day 2 and day 7 postoperatively
Time Frame: 7 days
|
7 days
|
|
Plasma lactate measured on day 1, day 2 and day 7 postoperatively
Time Frame: 7 days
|
7 days
|
|
C Reactive protein measured on day1, day2 and day7 postoperative
Time Frame: 7 days
|
7 days
|
|
Troponin Tc measured on day1, day2 and day7 postoperatively
Time Frame: 7 days
|
7 days
|
|
(NT pro) Brain Natriuretic Peptide ((NT pro) BNP) measured at day1, day2 and day7 postoperative
Time Frame: 7 days
|
7 days
|
|
the incidence of each complication
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
the SOFA score at day1
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), previously known as the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, is used to track a person's status during the stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure.
The SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.According to an observational study at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Belgium, the mortality rate is at least 50% when the score is increased, regardless of initial score, in the first 96 hours of admission, 27% to 35% if the score remains unchanged, and less than 27% if the score is reduced.
Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
|
1 day
|
the SOFA score at day2
Time Frame: 2 days
|
The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), previously known as the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, is used to track a person's status during the stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure.
The SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.According to an observational study at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Belgium, the mortality rate is at least 50% when the score is increased, regardless of initial score, in the first 96 hours of admission, 27% to 35% if the score remains unchanged, and less than 27% if the score is reduced.
Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
|
2 days
|
the SOFA score at day7
Time Frame: 7 days
|
The sequential organ failure assessment score (SOFA score), previously known as the sepsis-related organ failure assessment score, is used to track a person's status during the stay in an intensive care unit (ICU) to determine the extent of a person's organ function or rate of failure.
The SOFA scoring system is useful in predicting the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients.According to an observational study at an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Belgium, the mortality rate is at least 50% when the score is increased, regardless of initial score, in the first 96 hours of admission, 27% to 35% if the score remains unchanged, and less than 27% if the score is reduced.
Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.
|
7 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Stéphane Bar, Dr, CHU Amiens
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PI2018_843_0014
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Respiratory Complication
-
Asst Melegnano e MartesanaEnrolling by invitationMortality | Nephrotoxicity | Respiratory Complication | Neurological Complication | Surgical Complication | Metabolic Complication | Cardiovascular ComplicationItaly
-
Eske Kvanner AasvangCompletedComplication of Surgical Procedure | Respiratory Complication | Complication of Anesthesia | Circulatory; ComplicationsDenmark
-
Uppsala UniversityNot yet recruitingMechanical Ventilation Complication | Respiratory Complication | Neurological Complication
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedRespiratory Complication | Bypass ComplicationEgypt
-
Memorial Health University Medical CenterUnknownRespiratory ComplicationUnited States
-
Sangjin ParkCompleted
-
Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do SulCompletedRespiratory ComplicationBrazil
-
Medtronic - MITGTerminatedRespiratory ComplicationGermany
-
Vital USA, Inc.Clinimark, LLCCompleted
-
Sangjin ParkCompletedRespiratory ComplicationKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on : hemodynamic management
-
University Health Network, TorontoCompletedIntraoperative Fluid ManagementCanada
-
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfRecruitingPostoperative Complications | Surgery | Anesthesia | Cardiac OutputGermany, Denmark
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...CompletedFluid Therapy | Goal Directed TherapySpain
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted
-
Maria José Clara Colomina SolerCompletedPostoperative Complications | Postoperative Acute Kidney InjurySpain
-
Hemo Sapiens, Inc.CompletedHypertensionFrance, Estonia, Italy, Norway, Poland
-
Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital Hradec KraloveRecruiting
-
University of GiessenEdwards LifesciencesNot yet recruitingAcute Kidney Injury | Intraoperative Hypotension | Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery
-
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical...Completed