Hyperbaric Novabupi® in Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limbs Vascular Surgery

Non-inferiority Study of Hyperbaric Novabupi® (Bupivacaine S75: R25) Compared to Hyperbaric Neocaine® (Bupivacaine S50: R50) in Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limbs Vascular Surgery

This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study to evaluate the non-inferiority of hyperbaric Novabupi® versus hyperbaric Neocaine® in spinal anesthesia in lower limbs vascular surgery.

The schedule consists of four visits: screening (visit 1); pre-anesthetic evaluation and randomization (visit 2); treatment (visit 3) and discharge from study (visit 4).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maranhão
      • São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil, 65020-600

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provision of written informed consent
  • Both sexes
  • Age between 18 and 80 years, inclusive
  • ASA category I or II
  • Indication of spinal anesthesia for varicose vein surgery in lower limbs with a maximum duration of 3 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to spinal anesthesia
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to local anesthetics or to the components of formula
  • Use of any anticoagulant, regardless of type until 60 days before entering the study
  • Spinal cord injuries, peripheral neuropathies or any other neurological conditions leading to sensory and / or motor disorders
  • Dementia, mental retardation and other major cognitive changes
  • Obesity with body mass index (BMI) > 30 or difficulty in performing the puncture
  • Anatomical difficulty in the spine in the opinion of the Investigator that can make puncture difficult
  • Any previous surgical intervention of the spine
  • Tattoo at the puncture site
  • Participants with a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse, as defined by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition
  • Pernicious anemia
  • History of severe anaphylactic reactions or Steven-Johnson disease
  • Changes in safety exams (applicable at the time of randomization):

    • International Normalized Ratio ≥ 1.4
    • Hemoglobin < 10 g / dL
    • Platelet count <100,000 / mm3
    • Glycemia> 200 mg / dL
    • Bradyarrhythmias: heart block with clinical repercussion in the investigator's opinion
    • Maximum of eight ventricular extrasystoles per minute, evident on the ECG
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may lead to an increased risk for the participant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Hyperbaric Novabupi® 0.5% (bupivacaine S75:R25 + 8% glucose)
Spinal anesthesia, 20 mg
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Hyperbaric Neocaine® 0.5% (bupivacaine S50:R50 + 8% glucose)
Spinal anesthesia, 20 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between arms from latency to T10 dermatome sensitive block
Time Frame: 20 minutes
Time elapsed between the withdrawal of the needle at the end of the injection of the local anesthetic and the absence of response to sensorial stimuli in the region corresponding to the T10 dermatome
20 minutes
Comparison between arms from the duration of the sensory block
Time Frame: 24 hours
Time elapsed between the withdrawal of the needle at the end of the local anesthetic injection and the presence of positive sensitivity by needle stimulation in the L5 dermatome
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison between arms from the degree of motor blockage when blocking T10 sensitive
Time Frame: 20 minutes

The motor block will be evaluated by the modified Bromage scale. The degree of motor block will be assessed when the sensory block reaches T10.

The motor block will be evaluated every 5 minutes from the end of the anesthetic injection (time 0) through the modified Bromage scale:

  • 0 = without motor block,
  • 1 = blocked hip,
  • 2 = blocked hip and knee,
  • 3 = blocked hip, knee and ankle.

Will be recorded:

  • the degree of motor blockage when the sensory block reaches T10,
  • the time to reach the maximum block,
  • time for full recovery (Bromage score 0).
20 minutes
Comparison between arms from the duration of the motor block
Time Frame: 24 hours
Duration of motor block will be considered as the time interval between needle withdrawal after puncture and return to score 0 on the modified Bromage scale. Time will be recorded to reach grade 3 motor block and at the end of surgery. During anesthesia recovery, evaluations will be performed every 15 minutes
24 hours
Comparison between arms from the highest level of sensory block
Time Frame: 3 hours
3 hours
Comparison between arms from the time to reach the highest level of sensory block
Time Frame: 1 hour
1 hour
Comparison between arms from the time for the 4-segment regression of the sensory block
Time Frame: 3 hours
The height of the sensitive block will be evaluated every 5 minutes until the maximum level is reached. From this point, the height of the block will be evaluated every 10 minutes until the regression of 4 levels
3 hours
Comparison between arms of respiratory and cardiovascular safety
Time Frame: 12 hours

Evidenced by the incidence, severity and causality of clinically significant SpO2 changes.

Every 5 minutes SpO2 will be recorded until completing 60 minutes, every 10 minutes until completing 120 minutes, every 20 minutes until 12 hours.

12 hours
Comparison between arms of cardiovascular safety
Time Frame: 24 hours

Evidenced by the incidence, severity and causality of clinically significant changes in blood pressure measured automatically by cardiac monitoring.

Every 5 minutes blood pressure will be recorded until completing 60 minutes, every 10 minutes until completing 120 minutes, every 20 minutes until completing 180 minutes and every 30 minutes until complete recovery of the motor function.

24 hours
Comparison between arms of cardiovascular safety
Time Frame: 12 hours

Evidenced by the incidence, severity and causality of clinically significant changes in heart rate measured automatically by cardiac monitoring.

Every 5 minutes heart rate will be recorded until completing 60 minutes, every 10 minutes until completing 120 minutes, every 20 minutes until completing 180 minutes and every 30 minutes until complete recovery of the motor function

12 hours
Comparison between arms from the percentage of motor and sensory block failure
Time Frame: 20 minutes

After the needle has been withdrawn, the anesthetic should be installed for up to 20 minutes. If no sensory and / or motor blockage is observed after this period, the Investigator will indicate that there was an anesthetic failure that should be classified as:

A. total block failure (absence of anesthesia in sensory and motor aspects with preserved sensitivity of the perineal region) B. partial failure (when any area below the T10 dermatome shows signs of analgesia or motor block, but surgery can not be performed, requiring intense sedation or general anesthesia).

In case of failure, the participant will be immediately discontinued from the study and the surgery will normally proceed with anesthetic procedure at the discretion of the Investigator. Anesthesia failure should be reported as an adverse event.

20 minutes
Comparison between arms from the occurrence of adverse events
Time Frame: 7 days
Adverse event information will be collected from all participants on all visits
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 21, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on bupivacaine S75:R25 plus 8% glucose

3
Subscribe