Five and Ten Year Results of the CMK21 Hip System (CMK21)

April 5, 2019 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Five and ten year results of the CMK21 Hip system

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is being conducted to collect long term retrospective and prospective clinical and radiological data to evaluate the safety of revision rate and adverse events, and efficacy of clinical and patient assessment of the CMK21 hip stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Asse, Belgium
        • Novellas Healthcare
      • Hasselt, Belgium
        • Associatie Orthopedie Hasselt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population consists of all patients who received a CMK21 hip stem as part of a primary total hip arthroplasty between 2005 and 2007. This includes all diagnoses, all ages, male and female.

Description

Inclusion:

  • The patients enrolled in the study were already operated at the time of the screening.
  • All the patients with osteoarthritis of the hip who received CMK21 hip stem between 2005 and 2007.
  • Skeletally mature patients requiring primary total hip arthroplasty due to non-inflammatory arthritis (degenerative joint disease) such as osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, or traumatic arthritis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant revision rate
Time Frame: 5 years
Listing of implant status at 5 years to analyse the survival rate
5 years
Implant revision rate
Time Frame: 10 years
Listing of implants status at 10 years to analyse the survival rate
10 years
Device related adverse events
Time Frame: 10 years
Medical chart will be reviewed and device related events collected to monitor the safety
10 years
Device related adverse events
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years
Device related adverse events will be collected to monitor the safety
5 and 10 years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
Radiolucent lines and radiosclerotic lines at both the bone cement and cement prosthesis interface
5 and 10 Years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
Position and fixation of the components
5 and 10 Years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
the occurrence of osteolysis
5 and 10 Years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
the occurrence of heterotopic bone formation
5 and 10 Years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
the occurrence of atrophy or hypertrophy
5 and 10 Years
Radiographic assessment
Time Frame: 5 and 10 Years
the occurrence of cement tears/fractures
5 and 10 Years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years
Harris Hip Score is a clinical evaluation which consists of a maximum of 100 points (best possible outcome) covering pain (1 item, 44 points), function (7 items 47 points total), absence of deformity (1 item, 4 points), and range of motion (2 items, 5 points total).
5 and 10 years
EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: 5 and 10 years
The EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire is a subject self-assessment of quality of life and consists of five questions covering the dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D questionnaire also includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), by which subjects can report their perceived health status with a grade ranging from 0 (the worst possible health status) to 100 (the best possible health status).
5 and 10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Beate Hanson, VP, PhD, Vice President, Global Clinical Strategy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R11008-2B

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on CMK21 Hip system

3
Subscribe