Mind Over Matter: Electronic Bladder and Bowel Continence Self-management Program

September 9, 2020 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Reach and Teach: Translating "Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder" for Digital Delivery

The objective of this study is to (1) use participatory ergonomics to adapt and in-person 3-session intervention: Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM) to an electronic program (eMOM), and to (2) compare and characterize eMOM's reach when marketed via community agencies versus Facebook advertising and to collect qualitative and quantitative data about effectiveness and uptake of key behaviors using electronic surveys and phone interviews. The study will also collect information from community agencies that might implement eMOM about its perceived value and their willingness and capacity to implement such a program.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

More than half of patients hospitalized with serious illness rated urinary and bowel incontinence as a state worse than death in a 2016 JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) internal medicine study - worse than relying on a breathing machine, being unable to get out of bed, or being confused all the time. Unfortunately, over 60% of community-dwelling women over age 65 suffer from urinary and/or bowel incontinence, accounting for a combined annual cost in excess of $30 billion. In addition to their impact on quality of life, social isolation, and depression, urinary and bowel incontinence increase caregiver burnout, risk for falls, hospitalization, and nursing home placement. However, despite the existence of effective treatments, over half of women with urinary incontinence and two-thirds of women with bowel incontinence do not seek medical care. Interventions to promote continence in healthcare settings thus reach fewer than half of those in need.

At University of Wisconsin, research team developed "Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder" (MOM), which is a small-group, community-based health promotion program that builds skills and self-efficacy to make behavior changes that improve urinary and bowel symptoms among older women with incontinence. Delivered by a trained facilitator, MOM allows senior women to improve their symptoms without seeking medical care. In the randomized, controlled trial (RCT) including 122 women in 6 Wisconsin communities, more than 70% of participants (versus 23% of controls, p<.0001) achieved improvement in urinary incontinence and 55% (versus 26% of controls, p = .0015) achieved improvement in bowel incontinence three months following completion of the program, corresponding to a number-needed-to-treat of 3 for urinary incontinence improvement and 4 for bowel incontinence improvement.

However, community-based, in-person programs like MOM continue to suffer limited adoption, implementation, and reach. Many agencies that adopt and implement such health promotion programs are under-resourced and often staffed by volunteers. To ensure intervention fidelity, programs like MOM require a large commitment from their resource-stressed hosting agencies. Implemented using a "train the trainer" approach organized by the Wisconsin Institute for Healthy Aging (WIHA), MOM requires community facilitators to attend a 2-day training and then run the workshop series at least twice annually. In addition to the 2-day training, it requires approximately 24 person-hours to offer a single MOM workshop series. If the trained facilitator leaves or is redirected to other activities, the community agency can no longer implement or maintain the program without sending another staff member to be trained. In addition to these hurdles at the organization level, there are barriers at the individual level.

In a recent collaboration with the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin (SHOW), it was observed that fewer than 20% of women with incontinence (mean age 55 years old) reported being likely to attend a continence promotion program with the current, in-person MOM format. In qualitative interviews, women expressed concerns about the time commitment, caregiver responsibilities at home, issues related to travel (inclement weather, excessive distance to reach a community center), and privacy, given the sensitive nature of incontinence. In contrast, 65% of women with incontinence reported being likely to participate in an electronic continence promotion program, increasing potential reach three-fold.

Adaptation of the in-person MOM workshop to an electronic format (eMOM) has the potential to overcome both individual and organizational hurdles, maximizing reach and minimizing barriers to consistent implementation and maintenance. Women with incontinence can complete the modules in privacy, at their convenience, and at their own pace. In contrast to the commitment required for a community agency to implement the in-person MOM workshop, eMOM can be implemented using whatever strategies the agency uses to share other electronic resources with their members. eMOM can also be implemented via mass media, such as Facebook. Women age 65+ account for 11.6% of all Facebook users, and there are more than 200,000 monthly active users in this demographic in Wisconsin alone.

The proposed research will provide invaluable information about the feasibility and reach of implementing an electronic health promotion program through mass media versus through existing community agencies - information applicable not just to continence promotion but also to other health promotion programs trying to overcome similar barriers to reach, implementation, and maintenance.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

260

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

While eMOM will be promoted specifically for older women, women of any age may access the program and participate in the study if they so choose.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be able to access the eMOM website via internet
  • must be able to speak and read English
  • at least 18 years old
  • female.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no access to internet
  • no email address

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
eMOM website users

Any woman who visits the "research" tab on the eMOM website will see an invitation to participate in a research study about the impact of the website on her bladder and bowel symptoms. Women may use the intervention (the website) regardless of whether they opt to participate in the research study.

The intervention is the use of the website (eMOM), which is the electronic adaption of the program, Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM), a small-group, community-based health promotion program that builds skills and self-efficacy to make behavior changes that improve urinary and bowel symptoms among older women with incontinence.

The intervention is the use of the website (eMOM), which is the electronic adaption of the program, Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder (MOM), a small-group, community-based health promotion program that builds skills and self-efficacy to make behavior changes that improve urinary and bowel symptoms among older women with incontinence.
Other Names:
  • Mind Over Matter: Healthy Bowels, Healthy Bladder" (MOM)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response on global perception of improvement (GPI) tool at 4 months
Time Frame: 4 months

Global perception of improvement (GPI) is a tool for Global Rating of Patient Satisfaction and Perceptions of Improvement.

Question asked: Overall, do you feel that you are? Response can be chosen from the options: Much Better, Better, About the same, Worse, Much worse

4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the response of Global patient satisfaction question (PSQ)
Time Frame: 1 month, 4 months, 6 months
Patient satisfaction will be measured with the question: How satisfied are you with your progress in this program? (completely, some-what, not at all)
1 month, 4 months, 6 months
Change in patient estimated percent improvement (EPI)
Time Frame: 1 month, 4 months, 6 months
For EPI, Patients will be asked to estimate how much better they were on a scale from 0% (no better) to 100%(completely better)
1 month, 4 months, 6 months
Change in response on global perception of improvement (GPI) at 1 month and 6 months
Time Frame: 1 month, 6 month

Global perception of improvement (GPI) is a tool for Global Rating of Patient Satisfaction and Perceptions of Improvement.

Question asked: Overall, do you feel that you are? Response can be chosen from the options: Much Better, Better, About the same, Worse, Much worse

1 month, 6 month
Differences in scores of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ-UI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
ICIQ-UI is a subjective measure of severity of urinary loss and quality of life for those with urinary incontinence. It is scored on a scale from 0-21. Based on the score participant can be placed in four severity categories: slight (1-5), moderate (6-12), severe (13-18) and very severe (19-21)
Baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Differences in scores of the St. Mark's Incontinence Scale (aka Vaizey)
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month

St. Mark's Incontinence Scale (aka Vaizey) will be used to assess the severity and the outcome of MOM intervention

Never: no episodes in the past 4 weeks rarely: 1 episode in the past 4 weeks sometimes: > 1 episode in the past 4 weeks, but,1 a week; Weekly: 1 or more episodes a week but,1 a day Daily: 1 or more episodes a day

Scores will be assigned for each row (Never=0, Rarely=1, Sometimes=2, Weekley=3, Daily=4 )

Score will be added from each row. Cumulative minimum score=0 perfect continence; Cumulative maximum score will be 24= totally incontinence

baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported behavior changes: change in the frequency of pelvic floor muscle exercises
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Frequency of pelvic floor muscle exercises
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported behavior changes: change in fluid intake
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported behavior changes: fluid intake
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported behavior changes: change in fiber intake
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported behavior changes: change in fiber intake
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported coping changes: change in types of pad used
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported coping changes: change in types of pad used
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported coping changes: change in number of pads used
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported coping changes: change in number of pads used
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
Self-reported changes: change in the money-spent on buying products to manage their incontinence
Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month
It will be measured by asking participants question that how much money have they spent on products (such as pads, undergarments, or plugs) to manage their bladder and/or bowel symptoms in the last month.
baseline, 1 month, 4 month, 6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heidi Brown, MD, UW-Madison Obstetrics and Gynecology

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 11, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incontinence, Urinary

Clinical Trials on eMOM

3
Subscribe