Risk Assessment of Type 2 Diabetes in Pharmacies

October 15, 2019 updated by: University of Bergen

Risk Assessment and HaemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) -Measurement in Community Pharmacies to Identify People With Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes

Background: Due to lack of clear symptoms, type 2 diabetes can remain undetected for many years. Our aim was to explore the capacity of Norwegian community pharmacies to identify people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and the impact of the risk assessment service on self-rated health.

Methods: Nineteen community pharmacies were randomly allocated to a diabetes risk test only- group or Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) -group were the participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes also received a HbA1c-measurement. Two pharmacists at each pharmacy were trained to perform risk assessments and counselling. The pharmacists at the 11 HbA1c pharmacies were also trained in how to perform the HbA1c- measurement. During six months, pharmacy customers equal or over 45 years old, wishing to participate contacted the pharmacy staff. Participants completed a validated diabetes risk test and a background questionnaire including a validated instrument for self-rated health. In the risk test only-group, participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes were referred to their general practitioner for follow-up, while in the HbA1c-group, participants with HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/ mol (6.5%) were referred to their general practitioner.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Due to lack of clear symptoms, type 2 diabetes can remain undetected for many years. Our aim was to explore the capacity of Norwegian community pharmacies to identify people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and the impact of the risk assessment service on self-rated health.

Methods: Nineteen community pharmacies were randomly allocated to a diabetes risk test only- group or Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) -group were the participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes also received a HbA1c-measurement. Two pharmacists at each pharmacy were trained to perform risk assessments and counselling. The pharmacists at the 11 HbA1c pharmacies were also trained in how to perform the HbA1c- measurement. During six months, pharmacy customers equal or above 45 years old, wishing to participate contacted the pharmacy staff. Participants completed a validated diabetes risk test and a background questionnaire including a validated instrument for self-rated health. In the risk test only-group, participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes were referred to their general practitioner for follow-up, while in the HbA1c-group, participants with HbA1c ≥ 48 mmol/ mol (6.5%) were referred to their general practitioner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

368

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- age equal to or above 45 years old (increased from 18 years in the feasibility study), and being able to read and write Norwegian/English.

Exclusion Criteria:

- known diabetes, pregnancy and blood diseases that may affect measurement of Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Risk Assessment Only pharmacies (RTO-group)
Offered a diabetes risk assessment service without any blood sample testing.
Two pharmacists at each pharmacy were trained to perform risk assessments and counselling. During six months, pharmacy customers equal or above 45 years old, wishing to participate contacted the pharmacy staff. Participants completed a validated diabetes risk test and a background questionnaire including a validated instrument for self-rated health.
Experimental: HbA1c-group /pharmacies
Offered a diabetes risk assessment service including a measurement of Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to the people with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes on the risk assessment form (The Finnish Diabetes Risc Score (FINDRISC) to those with a western background, and Leicester Risk Assessment (LRA) form for those with a non-western background.
Two pharmacists at each pharmacy were trained to perform risk assessments and counselling. During six months, pharmacy customers equal or above 45 years old, wishing to participate contacted the pharmacy staff. Participants completed a validated diabetes risk test and a background questionnaire including a validated instrument for self-rated health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes
Time Frame: 2 months
Number of Participants with undiagnosed type 2 diabetes
2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Explore if there was any difference in the number of participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes in the risk test only (RTO)- group and the group that also offered a HbA1c-measurement (HbA1c-group)
Time Frame: Baseline
Find the number of participants with a high risk of developing type 2 diabetes
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Aslaug Johanne Risøy, PhDCandidate, University of Bergen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type2 Diabetes

3
Subscribe