Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block

June 18, 2020 updated by: Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomies.

The TAP block, first described by Rafi in 2001, is comprised of deposition of a local anesthetic into the anatomical plane between the internal oblique and transverses abdominis muscles, where thess thoracoabdominal nerves (T6-L1) contribute to the main sensory supply of the skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum of the anterior abdominal wall. These nerves branch and communicate extensively with each other in the TAP .

Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a recently described interfascial block in which the local anaesthectic is placed over or below the plane of the erector spinae muscle, near where the spinal nerves come out from the spine before they start to divide. Some publications have shown its effectiveness in treating thoracic and abdominal postoperative pain.

Postoperative pain is the major obstacle for early postoperative ambulation and increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, respiratory complications and prolongs the hospital stay. Parietal pain is the chief component of postoperative pain after abdominal surgeries. Large doses of opioids are required to mitigate this pain, but they are poorly tolerated. Multimodal analgesia is effective in handling postoperative pain and in attenuating the side effects of large doses of a single analgesic .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Group I (A group): Will undergo ESP block with 40 ml bupivacine 0.25% (20 ml on each side), and TAP block with 40 ml saline 0.9% (20 ml on each side).

Group II (B group): Will undergo TAP block with 40 ml bupivacine 0.25% (20 ml on each side), and ESP block with 40 ml saline 0.9% (20 ml on each side).

Group III (C group): anesthetized with the protocol followed by Minia University Hospital The medication will be prepared and supplied in similar syringes by an anesthetist not included in the management of the patint or data collection.

Methods:

Following placement of the standard monitors, intravenous access will secured and the patients will started on IV fluids. Anesthesia will be induced with 0.04 mg/kg midazolam, 2 μg/kg fentanyl, and titrated doses of propofol. Endotracheal intubation will facilitated with 0.5 mg/kg of atracurium. Isoflurane 1.2%, will be used for anesthetic maintenance After induction of anesthesia, stabilizing the patient's hemodynamics, and before surgical incision, ESB & TAP block will be performed. With the patient in the supine position, the site of the ultrasound and needle entry will be sterilized. The TAP block will be performed laterally behind the midaxillary line between the iliac crest and the most inferior extent of the ribs. The plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle will be located around the midaxillary line with the probe transverse to the abdomen. Anteriorly,The needle will be passed to come in plane with the ultrasound beam and placed between transversus and internal oblique posterior to the midaxillary line then, the local anesthetic will be injected. Then the patient will turn in lateral position, the site of the ultrasound and needle entry will be sterilized. The ESP block will be performed into a fascial plane between the deep surface of erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Minya, Egypt, 61511
        • Minia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age18-70 . 2. Both gender . 3 .Emergency laparotomies . 4. ASA I-III .

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Drug allergy .
  2. Morbid obesity (BMI >40 kg/m2) .
  3. Psychiatric disorder .
  4. Opioid dependence .
  5. patient refuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (A group)
31 patients Will undergo ESP block with 40 ml bupivacine 0.25% (20 ml on each side), and TAP block with 40 ml saline 0.9% (20 ml on each side).
The ESP block will be performed into a fascial plane between the deep surface of erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes
Active Comparator: Group II (B group)
31patients Will undergo TAP block with 40 ml bupivacine 0.25% (20 ml on each side), and ESP block with 40 ml saline 0.9% (20 ml on each side).
The TAP block will be performed laterally behind the midaxillary line between the iliac crest and the most inferior extent of the ribs. The plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscle will be located around the midaxillary line with the probe transverse to the abdomen. Anteriorly,The needle will be passed to come in plane with the ultrasound beam and placed between transversus and internal oblique posterior to the midaxillary line then, the local anesthetic will be injected
Placebo Comparator: Group III (C group)
31 patients anesthetized with the protocol followed by Minia University Hospital
placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of First Post Operative Analgesic Request
Time Frame: 24 hours
the pain will be assisted based on the time for the first dose of rescue analgesia
24 hours
Postoperative Total Fentanyl Requirement
Time Frame: 24 hours
The total amount of postoperative fentanyl in milligram was given to the patient as rescue analgesia during 24 hours
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Any Adverse Events
Time Frame: 5 days
adverse events related to technique or drugs
5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Nagy S. Ali, MD, Minia University Hospital
  • Study Director: Abeer A Hassanien, Minia University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 12, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2020

Last Verified

June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on erector spinae plane block

3
Subscribe