Feasibility Study Comparing Enteral vs Parenteral Nutritional Outcomes in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Patients

March 27, 2020 updated by: Lawson Health Research Institute

A Pilot Feasibility Study of Nutritional Outcomes in Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients Comparing Enteral Nutrition Versus Parenteral Nutrition

This study will highlight that Enteral Nutrition (EN) is as effective in nutritionally supporting as Parenteral Nutrition (PN) in this group of patients undergoing an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT). The rationale of this study is to compare nutritional, medical, cost and Quality of Life (QOL) outcomes in patients receiving either EN or PN nutritional support in patients. The main outcomes are to examine are nutritional status, medical complications, cost and QOL before and after AHSCT.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This will be a pilot open randomized study. The study will be conducted at the inpatient setting at London Health Sciences Centre in London, ON. Forty patients will be randomized in permutated blocks independently by Statistician, to either the EN or PN group on admission to the unit. The baseline evaluations are blood work, Bioelectric Impedance Analysis (BIA), Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Body Mass Index (BMI) calculation, ultrasound, and a medical evaluation. Patients do have the right to refuse either or both types of nutritional support. As part of standard care, the risks and benefits of nutritional support for both EN and PN will be explained to the patient.

Consent will be obtained prior to admission. Most of these patients initially continue to maintain their oral intake even after chemotherapy. On Day 5+/- 1 day after transplantation, the randomized nutrition therapy will only be initiated only if patient intake is < 80% of usual intake, where they will be provided with 25-35 kcal/kg/day, 1.2-1.5g of protein/kg/day, and omega-3 to supplement any oral intake the patient might not have. If the intake is >80% of required intake, initiation of randomized therapy will only happen on the day the intake falls to <80% of required nutritional intake.

Patients will be monitored until Day 15 where post-transplant evaluations will be conducted: blood work, BIA, SGA, ultrasound, BMI, food records, and medical evaluation. If at that time, patients are not consuming 50% of energy from oral feeds, nutrition therapy will continue until oral goal is met or until discharge for medical reasons. Patients will be assessed at Day+30 post-transplant in clinic and the following will be completed blood work, BIA, SGA, BMI, food records, ultrasound, medical complications and a QOL assessment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5W9
        • Recruiting
        • London Health Sciences Centre-Victoria Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients aged 18 to 75 years.
  • Patients admitted to Victoria Hospital undergoing AHSCT on C7 unit.
  • Patient consented to participate in the study
  • Patients diagnosed with the following conditions: Non- Hodgkin's Lymphoma (all types), Hodgkin's Lymphoma (all subtypes) and Multiple Myeloma
  • Patients receiving any of the following: Conditioning chemotherapy: Melphalan, Etoposide/Melphalan, or Carmustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine, Melphalan
  • Have a functional Gastrointestinal tract

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intestinal obstruction
  • Patients with nasal deformities, tumors of nasal tracts or upper nare obstruction.
  • Patients with active bacteremia while proceeding with transplant
  • Patients with active malignancy of Upper GI tract, not in remission as evidenced by recent imaging studies (< 4 weeks)
  • Patients with any GI bleeding, paralytic ileus, obstruction, or any other GI condition which excludes use of the GI system for nutritional support as these patients will require PN feeding only and cannot be randomized

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Parenteral Nutrition
Patients who have been randomized to receive PN will be started on day 5 post AHSCT. This will be if patient intake is < 80% of usual oral intake at that time. The central venous catheter required for PN administration will be already in place for AHSCT treatment, prior to admission and pre-transplant evaluation. Nutritional support will continue until oral intake is >50% or until the patient is ready for discharge if intake remains < 50% of recommendations.
Patients randomized to the parenteral nutrition arm will receive nutrition by IV and patients randomized to the enteral nutrition arm will receive nutrition by NG tube.
Experimental: Enteral Nutrition
Patients who have been randomized to receive EN will have a Nasogastric tube (NGT) inserted on day 5 post AHSCT, prior to start of Enteral feeds. This would be a polyurethane tube, 8-10 French, which will be inserted by physician or Nurse Practitioner with position confirmed by radiological examination. This will be if patient intake is < 80% of usual oral intake at that time. Nutritional support will continue until oral intake is >50% or until the patient is ready for discharge if intake remains < 50% of recommendations.
Patients randomized to the parenteral nutrition arm will receive nutrition by IV and patients randomized to the enteral nutrition arm will receive nutrition by NG tube.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment of patients
Time Frame: 30 days
The number of patients enrolled
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
quadriceps muscle layer thickness
Time Frame: 21 days
Maintenance and/or improvement of quadriceps muscle layer thickness (QMLT) measurement: measured by ultrasound.
21 days
Duration of Support
Time Frame: 21 days
A comparison of duration in days a patient will require enteral or parenteral nutritional support during their admission.
21 days
Changes in costs
Time Frame: 21 days
The cost of daily total PN is $80/day and cost of EN feeds would be $40/day. This is a 50% change in costs.
21 days
Hospital Stay
Time Frame: 21 days
Length of hospital stay (decrease by 1+/-2 days)
21 days
Mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
Mortality on Day+30 Post AHSCT
30 days
Changes in body fat
Time Frame: 21 Days
Measuring the changes in percentage of body fat mass using Bioelectric Impedance Analysis
21 Days
Changes in Lean Muscle
Time Frame: 21 Days
Measuring the changes in percentage lean muscle mass using Bioelectric Impedance Analysis
21 Days
Changes in costs to hospital when using enteral nutritional
Time Frame: 21 Days
the measurement the length of their stay in the hospital by days, fewer days of hospitalization = lower costs and more days of hospitalization = greater costs
21 Days
Transition from EN to oral feeding
Time Frame: 15 Days
Successful transition from EN to oral feeding versus Parenteral Nutrition to oral feeding defined by 50% oral intake on Day+15 of AHSCT.
15 Days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LHSC BMT19.01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The investigators do not plan on sharing individual participant data to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Hematologic Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on Parenteral Nutrition/Enteral Nutrition

3
Subscribe