Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in Obese Subjects With NASH (TESLA-NASH)

September 28, 2020 updated by: UECV, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla

STudy to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Versus LAparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) in Obese Subjects With Non-Alcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH)

The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the effect of ESG with OverStitch® system (Apollo Endosurgery, Austin, TX, USA) compared to LSG on 1) histological improvement in NASH; 2) all-cause mortality and liver-related outcomes In obese subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

Condition or disease: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis Intervention/treatment: ESG with OverStitch® system vs LSG

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 39008
        • Recruiting
        • Hospitl Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
        • Contact:
          • Paula Iruzubieta, PHD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects aged between 18 and 60 years (inclusive) at first screening visit.
  2. Must provide signed written informed consent and agree to comply with the study protocol.
  3. BMI between 35 and 45 kg/m2 with or without metabolic risk factors (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, dyslipidaemia), and BMI between 30 and 34,9 kg/m2 with type 2 diabetes.
  4. Histological confirmation of steatohepatitis in a diagnostic liver biopsy (biopsy obtained in the 6 months prior to randomization or during the selection period) with at least a score of 1 in each component of the NAS score (steatosis with a score of 0 to 3, degeneration by ballooning with a score of 0 to 2 and lobular inflammation with a score of 0 to 3) and:

    • NAS score ≥ 4
    • fibrosis < 4 according to the staging system of CRN fibrosis on NASH
  5. For patients with fibrosis ≤ 1, must be associated at least one of the following conditions: metabolic syndrome (NCEP ATP III definition), type 2 diabetes, HOMA-IR >6
  6. Absence of other well documented causes of chronic liver disease (alcoholic liver disease, viral hepatitis, cholestasis, autoimmune hepatitis, Wilson's disease, hemochromatosis, alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency)
  7. Patients agree to have 1 liver biopsy after 96 weeks after intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known heart failure (Grade I to IV of the classification of the New York Heart Association).
  2. History of efficient bariatric surgery within 10 years prior to Screening.
  3. Patients with a history of clinically significant acute cardiac event in the 6 months prior to selection, such as: acute cardiovascular event, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, or coronary heart disease (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, revascularization procedures).
  4. Weight loss of more than 5% in the 6 months prior to randomization.
  5. Recent or current background of significant consumption of alcoholic beverages (<5 years). In the case of men, significant consumption is usually defined as more than 30 g of pure alcohol per day. In the case of women, it is usually defined as more than 20 g of pure alcohol per day.
  6. Liver cirrhosis.
  7. Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.
  8. Esophagogastric varices.
  9. Hepatocellular carcinoma
  10. Portal thrombosis.
  11. Pregnancy.
  12. Refusal to give informed consent.
  13. Any medical condition that could reduce life expectancy to less than 2 years, including known cancers.
  14. Signs of any other unstable or clinically significant immunological, endocrine, hematological, gastrointestinal, neurological, neoplastic or psychiatric disease without treatment.
  15. Instability or mental incompetence, so that the validity of the informed consent or the ability to comply with the study are uncertain.
  16. Antibodies positive for the human immunodeficiency virus.
  17. Descompensated liver disease with the following hematologic and biochemical criteria:

    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and / or ALT> 10 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
    • Total bilirubin> 25 μmol / l (1.5 mg / dl)
    • Standardized international index> 1.4
    • Platelet count <100 000 / mm3
  18. Serum creatinine levels> 135 μmol / l (> 1.53 mg / dl) in men and> 110 μmol / l (> 1.24 mg / dl) in women.
  19. Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (patients with markers of hepatic injury or estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2). If an abnormal value is obtained at the first screening visit, the eGFR measurement may be repeated before randomization within the following time frame: minimum 4 weeks after the initial test and maximum 2 weeks before the expected randomization. An abnormal repeated eGFR (less than 60 ml / min / 1.73 m2) leads to exclusion from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: ESG Stitch® system + Lifestyle modifications
Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
Endoscopic technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of continuous sutures of the entire gastric wall of the antrum and body, transmurally, in order to simulate a gastric sleeve, in the same way as sleeve gastrectomy surgery. Gastroplasty is performed using an endoscopic suture system (OverStitch, Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) inserted into a dual-channel endoscope (GIF-2T160, Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: LSG + Lifestyle modifications
Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.
Minimally invasive surgical technique defined as a gastric restriction by means of an excision approximately 80% of the stomach along the greater curvature.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects undergoing ESG relative to LSG achieving resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
To evaluate the effect of ESG compared to LSG on liver histology in obese subjects with NASH with or without fibrosis by assessing the following endpoint: The proportion of subjects undergoing ESG relative to LSG achieving NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis. NASH resolution is defined as the disappearance of ballooning and the disappearance or persistence of minimal lobular inflammation (grade 0 or 1) The worsening of fibrosis is defined as the progression of at least one stage.
Measurement at 96 weeks
Proportion of subjects undergoing ESG relative to LSG with cardiovascular and liver-related death events
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
To evaluate the effect of ESG compared to LSG on liver histology in obese subjects with NASH with fibrosis by assessing the following endpoint: The proportion of subjects undergoing ESG relative to LSG achieving improvement of liver fibrosis of at least one stage.
Measurement at 96 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of subjects undergoing ESG relative to LSG achieving improvement in liver histology according to the NASH-CRN scoring
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Percentage of patients with at least 1 point improvement
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in the liver enzymes
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
ALT, AST, GGT, AP (U/L)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in lipid parameter
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, Triglycerides (mg/dL)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Fatty Liver Index (FLI) (<30; 30-60; >60)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Hepatic steatosis index (HSI) (<30; 30-36; >36)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) (<-1.455; -1.455-0.676; >0.676)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
AST to Plateler ratio index (APRI) (<1, >1)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) (<1.30; 1.30-2.67; >2.67)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in noninvasive markers of fibrosis and steatosis
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS) (<0.12; 0.12-0.47; >0.47)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in body weight
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
body weight
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Ferritin in ng/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
C-rective protein (CRP) in mg/dL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in mg/L
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) in pg/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Interleukin 1 beta (IL-1b) in pg/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in inflammatory markers
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFa) in pg/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in serum expression of incretins
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
serum expression of incretins
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in mineral metabolism parameters.
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Parathormone (PTH) (pg/mL), 25(OH)D (ng/mL), PINP, b-CTX (ng/mL)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in gut microbiota
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing from stool samples
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Glucose in mg/dL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) in %
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (not unit)
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Adponectin in ug/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Retinol binding protein 4 (RBP-4) in ug/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in ug/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Changes in glucose homeostasis markers and insulin resistance
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Plaminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) in ug/mL
Measurement at 96 weeks
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Measurement at 96 weeks
Safety and tolerability
Measurement at 96 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 28, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)

Clinical Trials on Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) with OverStitch® system + Lifestyle modifications

3
Subscribe