Cost-Effectiveness Study of PEG-rhG-CSF in Prophylactic Treatment of Neutropenia After Chemotherapy in Lymphoma

September 5, 2019 updated by: Zhao Weili, Ruijin Hospital

Cost-Effectiveness Study of Pegylated Recombinant Human Granulocyte Colony-stimulating Factor(PEG-rhG-CSF) in Prophylactic Treatment of Neutropenia After Chemotherapy in Lymphoma

This is a pharmacoeconomic research to explore the cost-effectiveness of PEG-rhG-CSF and rhG-CSF in prophylactic treatment of neutropenia in lymphoma patients. It should provide more scientific basis for clinical decision-making.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Recruiting
        • Ruijin Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-65 years
  • histologically confirmed de novo Non Hodgkin's lymphoma (except highly aggressive lymphoma such as lymphoblastic lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma)
  • plan to be given 6-8 cycles of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) ± Rituximab (R)
  • KPS ≥70
  • plan continuous PEG-rhG-CSF or rhG-CSF adiministration after at least 3 cycles of treatment for neutropenia prophylactic treatment
  • absolute neutrophil count≥1.5×109/L,platelet count ≥100× 109/L,hemoglobin≥90g/L,while blood cell count≥3.0×109/L,without bleeding signs
  • adquate liver and renal function as protocol discribed
  • no serious cardiovascular disease as protocol discribed
  • under good mental conditions and informed consented
  • potential benefit for subjects based on investigators' decision

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of hematopoetic stem cell transplantationor organ transplantation
  • uncontrollable infection
  • allergic to study drugs or ingredients
  • accepted any other investigational drug or participated another interventional study within 30 days during screening period
  • other uncontrollable conditions judged by the investigator
  • breast-feeding , pregnant or plan to be pregnant during study observation period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEG-rhG-CSF cohort

PEG-rhG-CSF primary/secondary prevention will be given 24-72 hours after each cycle for only once.

Dosage: 6mg for weight ≥45kg,3mg for weight <45kg, subcutaneous injection

Patients will be given PEG-rhG-CSF for primary/secondary prevention each cycle.
Experimental: rhG-CSF cohort

rhG-CSF primary/secondary prevention will be given 24-72 hours after each cycle until absolute neutrophil count ≥2×10^9/L.

rhG-CSF treatment will be given when there is neutropenia until absolute neutrophil count ≥2×10^9/L.

Dosage: 5μg/kg/d, subcutaneous injection

Patients will be given rhG-CSF for either primary/secondary prevention or treatment once any neutropenia each cycle.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental Cost-Effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: 1 year
A comparison of the different strategies based on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which is defined by the difference in costs between interventions, divided by the difference in their measured impact
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost-Effectiveness ratio
Time Frame: 1 year
A comparison of the different strategies based on the cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which is defined by the difference in costs between interventions, divided by the difference in their measured impact
1 year
Sensitivity analysis
Time Frame: 1 year
A sensitivity analysis is a way of examining Sensitivity to Change in results due to changes in the parameter values applied within a certain scope.
1 year
Incidence of febrile neutropenia
Time Frame: 1 year
Incidence of febrile neutropenia (i.e. absolute neutrophil count<0.5×10^9/L and temperature ≥38℃)in each cycle
1 year
Duration time of febrile neutropenia
Time Frame: 1 year
Duration time of febrile neutropenia (i.e. absolute neutrophil count<0.5×10^9/L and temperature ≥38℃)in each cycle
1 year
Incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia
Time Frame: 1 year
Incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia(i.e. absolute neutrophil count<1×10^9/L)in each cycle
1 year
Duration time of grade 3-4 neutropenia
Time Frame: 1 year
Duration time of grade 3-4 neutropenia(i.e. absolute neutrophil count<1×10^9/L)in each cycle
1 year
Relative dosage intensity
Time Frame: 1 year
comparison between planned and actual chemotherapy dosage in each cycle
1 year
Usage rate of antibiotics
Time Frame: 1 year
Usage rate of antibiotics during study period
1 year
Adverse events
Time Frame: 1 year
incidence and severity of adverse events during study period
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin

Clinical Trials on PEG-rhG-CSF

3
Subscribe