Impact of a Multimodal Intervention on Peripheral Venous Catheterization of Cancer Patients (MultiCat)

March 22, 2022 updated by: Paulo Costa, Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra

Peripheral intravenous catheterization (PIVC) is the most frequent invasive clinical procedure in a hospital setting, associated with significant complication rates for the patient, compromising their well-being, as well as the quality, safety, and efficacy of the care provided. The traditional approach to PIVC is considered reactive and ineffective, resulting in the exhaustion of the patients' peripheral venous access prior to consideration of other access methods and options (Moureau et al., 2012).

Evidence suggests that the safety and effectiveness of patients with a peripheral catheter are also intrinsically associated with the adequacy of materials and technologies used in clinical contexts for vein selection, as well as for catheter insertion and maintenance care (Marsh, Webster, Mihala & Rickard, 2017). Several studies point to the inadequacy of the technologies and medical devices used in this area, enhancing the occurrence of complications such as infection, phlebitis, occlusion and accidental catheter removal (Braga, 2017; Costa, 2017; Nobre & Martins, 2018).

The project investigators aim to determine whether the use of a PIVC pack will significantly reduce associated complications when compared with the usual care. Additionally, the research team aims to determine if the use of a PIVC pack will reduce the number of insertion attempts and overall procedure time, as well as improving patient and provider satisfaction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Coimbra, Portugal
        • Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who require peripheral intravenous catheterization as part of their therapeutic plan (caliber 20G or 22G);
  • Participants whose primary nurse agrees to participate in the study;
  • Participants who are able to give written assent or oral assent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Confused and/or disoriented participants;
  • Participants who are unable to communicate orally and/or in writing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual Care
Usual care during peripheral venous catheterization. Nurses will continue with the normal routine practice, by preparing all needed material individually.
Experimental: PIVC pack
Nurses will use a sterile pack that includes all needed devices for peripheral intravenous catheterization according to the latest evidence (eg, cannula, swabs, disposable tourniquet, antiseptic).
The PIVC pack is a sterile container that includes inside all the need devices to perform peripheral catheterization. The pack is color-coded to inform healthcare professionals about the catheter caliber inside.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIVC-related complications
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluated through a self-report scale where the nurse identifies a set of indicators associated to the occurrence of immediate complications during the procedure (extravasation, puncture of proximal anatomical structures, hematoma, etc.)
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful intravenous catheterization on the first attempt
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Successful attempt is defined through the clear flush of the catheter with 5 mL of normal saline without extravasation.
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Number of attempts to successful intravenous catheter placement
Time Frame: Immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Immediately following intervention, an average of 5 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Time to successful placement (in minutes)
Time Frame: From time of randomization until the time of successful intravenous catheter placement, assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
From time of randomization until the time of successful intravenous catheter placement, assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months.
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluated through a self-report scale where the participant identifies a set of indicators associated to their satisfaction with the intervention, when compared to previous experiences.
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Nurse satisfaction
Time Frame: This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months
Evaluated through a self-report scale where the nurse identifies a set of indicators associated to their satisfaction with the intervention, when compared to previous experiences.
This outcome will be assessed immediately following intervention, an average of 20 minutes. This outcome will be assessed through study completion, an average of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paulo Costa, MSc, The Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 9, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Esenfc

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Catheterization, Peripheral

Clinical Trials on PIVC pack

3
Subscribe