Evaluation the Impact of Self-Stigma Reduction Program on Psychosocial Outcomes Among People Diagnosed With Schizophrenia

September 10, 2019 updated by: Abd Alhadi Hasan, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences

Backgrounds: Research evidence suggests that people diagnosed with schizophrenia (PDwS) experience higher level of stigma compared with other forms of mental illness, and they are prone to internalize stereotype, which exacerbates severity of psychiatric symptoms, reduces their psychosocial treatment adherence. The purpose of the study to evaluate the effectiveness of stigma reduction program on the perceived stigma, psychiatric symptoms, compliance with psychosocial intervention and self-efficacy.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from November 2017 to December 2018 with 278 PDwS. Participants aged 18 years or older with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, from four outpatient mental health clinics in Jordan, were randomly assigned to receive 13 sessions of a booklet form of stigma reduction program (n = 140) (psycho-education, cognitive behavioural therapy and social skills training), and treatment as usual [TAU] (intervention, n = 140), or TAU (control, n = 138). Participants were assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention (post-treatment1) and at six months follow-up. The primary outcome measure was change in stigma perception. Secondary outcomes were psychiatric symptoms, compliance with psychosocial interventions and self-efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

278

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amman, Jordan, 00962
        • Ministry of Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Eligibility Criteria

  • Adults aged 18 or over diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-V) (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
  • All participants had to be able to read and write English or Arabic
  • Willing and able to consent.

Exclusion criteria were:

- People diagnosed with schizophrenia who had a learning disability, with known organic mental disorder, substance abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Experimental: Intervention vs control

Participants in the intervention group received treatment as usual, supported with stigma reduction program booklets each fortnight for 26 weeks. The stigma reduction program includes three modules; psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy and social skills training. The program aims to enhance patient understanding of Schizophrenia and foster communication skills which supposed to increase self-confidence and strengthen communication networking with society.

Psychoeducation module purposes at introducing about the concepts of schizophrenia, providing patient with essential information about schizophrenia, including nature of disease, sign/symptoms, treatment strategies, side effects of medication. Social Skills Training (SST) module purposes at fostering communication skills among patient diagnosed with schizophrenia. This assists the participants to be re-integrated in the society and build a harmonious atmosphere in the community.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome was stigma perception measured by the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)
Time Frame: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
The primary outcome was stigma perception measured by the Internalised Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI). This scale has 29 items measure service user experience of stigma. It is composed of 5 subscales: alienation (6 items), stereotype endorsement (7 items), discrimination experience (5 items), social withdrawal (6 items), and stigma resistance (5 items). Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree). The five stigma resistance subscale items are reverse-coded, and also serve as a validity check. The stigma resistance score is calculated by subtracting the actual value from five. Therefore, stigma resistance displays the same direction of correlation as the other four subscales. A high total score on the ISMI scale indicates more severe internalized stigmatization. The internal consistency is (α=0.90) and test-retest reliability (r=0.92) have been reported for the ISMI (Ritsher & Phelan, 2004).
November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
PANSS measures 30 clinical symptoms of schizophrenia; each symptom is scored from 1 indicating absence of psychopathology to 7 indicating severe psychopathology, with higher scores indicating poorer mental health status. Internal reliability and criterion-related validity are 0.77 (positive scale) and 0.77 (negative scale), and 0.52 with the Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI) (Kay, Fiszbein, & Opfer, 1987). The primary researcher (AH) attended training delivered by the PANSS Institute, USA, and trained the outcomes assessors. An inter-rater reliability checked prior to the study, between assessors was 0.75 and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation (ICC) was 0.79. This tool was administered in English by the primary researcher (AH) and research assistants.
November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
The Psychosocial Treatment Compliance Scale (PTCS)
Time Frame: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
The Psychosocial Treatment Compliance Scale (PTCS) (Tsang et al., 2006) has 17 items rated from "(1) never" to "(5) always". The PTCS has the "participation" (12 items) and "attendance" (5 items) subscales. The scale has two main parts, participation which indicates the level of participants engagement and participation in the psychosocial interventions (e.g., "was willing to follow therapists' instructions"). However, attendance measures that participants commitment to scheduled appointments (e.g., "attended prescribed psychosocial treatment on time"). The scale has good psychometric properties (internal consistency: α=.87-.96; test-retest reliability: ICC=.86-.90) were demonstrated for the subscales (Tsang et al., 2006).
November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
The Chinese General Self-efficacy Scale (CGSS)
Time Frame: November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)
The Chinese General Self-efficacy Scale (CGSS) developed by (Chiu & Tsang, 2004). This scale has a 10-item. Scoring system ranges from "(1) Not at all true" to "(4) Exactly true". Participants with higher score reflect better general self-efficacy. The CGSS demonstrated good internal consistency (α=0.92-0.93) and test-retest reliability (ICC=0.75-0.94) (Chiu & Tsang, 2004).
November 2017-December 2018 (up to 11 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 22, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5115

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stigmatization

Clinical Trials on Stigma reduction program

3
Subscribe