An International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry on Post-traumatic Long Bones Defects

March 12, 2024 updated by: AO Innovation Translation Center

An International, Multicenter, Prospective Registry to Investigate Treatment Options and Their Outcomes on Post-traumatic Long Bones Defects

Long bone defect (LBD) is defined as a focalized loss of bone tissue in any long bone of the upper or lower extremity. Long bone defects are a complex problem, that may arise as a complication of many different pathologies, such as trauma, tumors or infection. Whereas post-traumatic defects are the largest group.

Reports estimate that there are almost 4 million bone grafting procedures worldwide per year. However, limb reconstruction in the context of a bony defect is challenging and up to date there is little evidence and treatment recommendations.

In a multi-national approach, the aim of this project is to set up an international, multicenter registry to gather information and details on prevalence or incidence, current treatments, complications and outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

The purpose of this project is to set up an international, multicenter registry of patient presenting with defects in long bones. Up to date, treatment remains challenging with little evidenced-based recommendations.

For this purpose, any patient who presents at a study center with a bone defect of the defined expansion of any long bone is eligible for inclusion. Over a 3-year period as many patients as possible are included from the participating sites, at least 600 patients should be included in the registry. Details on any surgical intervention that is used to treat a bone defect will be recorded. Further patient-related and other pre-defined outcome measures will be collected.

There is no formal hypothesis to this registry, hence it will help to identify prevalence and underlying etiologies, evaluate treatment strategies, and highlight possible challenges and complications - and will so help to gather clinical evidence to provide better treatment for patients suffering from a long bone defect.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

600

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with a traumatic bone defect in any long bone

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Skeletally mature
  • Post traumatic bone defect > 2 cm either

    • initially after injury or
    • after surgical debridement
  • Informed consent obtained, i.e.:

    • Ability to understand the content of the patient information/ICF
    • Willingness and ability to participate in the clinical investigation according to the registry plan
    • Signed and dated EC/IRB approved written informed consent OR
    • Written consent provided according to the IRB/EC defined and approved procedures for patients who are not able to provide independent written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any oblique defect that has less than 8cm expansion when adding the defect size of all four cortices
  • Any not medically managed severe systemic disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners
  • Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product registry within the previous 3 months that could influence the results of the present registry

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Baseline characteristics
Time Frame: Pre-operative
Demographics, medical history, comorbidity
Pre-operative
Bone defect details
Time Frame: Pre-operative and/or intraoperative
  • Affected bone
  • Localization: Proximal 1/3rd, middle 3rd, distal 1/3rd(for any bone)
  • Size (categorization according Karger classification; definition: a bone defect should be at least 2 cm (Karger Type II)) Type II: 2-5 cm Type III: 5-10 cm Type IV: > 10 cm
Pre-operative and/or intraoperative
Trauma assessment
Time Frame: Pre-operative and/or intraoperative
  • Injury Severity Score (ISS): Grading for each item (points): No injury (0), Minor (1), Moderate (4), Serious (9), Severe (16), Critical (25), Unsurvivable (75)
  • Assessment:

    • Head and neck worst injury
    • Face worst injury
    • Chest worst injury
    • Abdomen worst injury
    • Extremity (including pelvis) worst injury
    • External worst injury
  • Gustilo & Anderson classification for open fractures

    • Type I
    • Type II
    • Type IIIA
    • Type IIIB
    • Type IIIC
  • Tscherne classification for closed fracture and soft-tissue injuries

    • Grade 0
    • Grade 1
    • Grade 2
    • Grade 3
Pre-operative and/or intraoperative
evaluate the bone defect in the context of previous interventions
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Number of previous interventions: <2, <4, >4
Intraoperative
Surgical details & Intraoperative findings 1
Time Frame: Intraoperative
  • Procedure type:

    • One stage
    • Staged (e.g. Masquelet technique / distraction osteogenesis / bone transport)
    • Ilizarov
  • Bone quality (good, fair, poor) by surgeon's discretion
  • Soft tissue and vascularity (good, fair, poor) by surgeon's discretion
  • Contamination (yes/no)

Specification:

  • Metal from a bullet
  • Metal from a pole
  • Other Metal
  • Wood
  • Soil
  • Others

    • Surgical time (min)
    • Stabilization technique: Internal device (extra- or intramedullary) / External device (For both, drop down menu will be used)
Intraoperative
Surgical details & Intraoperative findings 2
Time Frame: Intraoperative
  • Bone grafting

    • Autografts
    • Allograft(s)
    • Other synthetics
    • If applicable - time to harvest graft (in minutes)
  • Graft enhancement yes / no

    • Demineralized bone matrix (DBM)
    • Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)
    • Stem cells
    • Platelet rich plasma (PRP)
    • Other
  • Soft-tissue / vascular / microsurgical procedure yes / no

    • Skin graft
    • Local flap
    • Free flap
  • Additional treatment

    • Systemic antibiotic treatment yes / no
    • Local antibiotic treatment yes / no
    • Post-operative use of a negative pressure dressings (NPWT) or vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system yes / no
Intraoperative
Functional Outcome
Time Frame: 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 12 months)

- Assessment of limb function and loss of length

  • Definition: anatomic shortening of the limb in comparison to the contralateral side
  • Assessment in cm
  • Any orthotic used to equalize leg length
6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 12 months)
Patient related outcome / Quality of life 1
Time Frame: Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)

  • Physical function: This item measures self-reported capability rather than actual performance. It includes the functioning of lower extremities (walking or mobility) as well as instrumental activities of daily living, such as running errands. We will use the short form 10b.
  • Physical function, upper extremity: This item measures activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand activities. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. We will use the short form 7.
  • Pain Interference: This item assesses self-reported consequences of pain on relevant aspects of one's life. This includes the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities. We will use the short form 8a.

Short forms will be used in all sites possible (i.e. where the translation is available).

Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)
Patient related outcome / Quality of life 2
Time Frame: Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

EQ-5D-3L assessment (Five items, 3-point categorical scale) The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems.

o The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale where the endpoints are labelled 'Best imaginable health state' and 'Worst imaginable health state'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflects the patient's own judgement.

Screening / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)
Radiological Outcome
Time Frame: Screening / / Intraoperative / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

Pre-operative/intraoperative

  • Deformity parameters (if applicable)
  • Nonunion classification: Hypertrophic, Oligotrophic, Atrophic Follow-up visits
  • Bone healing (based on the treating physician's judgement): Not healed / Partially healed / Mostly healed / Healed
  • Evaluation of the expansion of the bone defect: bone defect size
  • Time to healing: Date when full healing is achieved (to be calculated days from index surgery)
Screening / / Intraoperative / 6 months follow-up / 12 months follow-up and/or 6 months after bone union (max 18 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hans-Christoph Pape, MD, University Hospital Zurich Department of Trauma Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • LoBoDe Registry

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Loss

Clinical Trials on Any treatment that is used for a defect of any long bone

3
Subscribe