Developing and Piloting an Online, Self-help Intervention (STAGE) for Anxiety

August 19, 2020 updated by: Canterbury Christ Church University

Developing and Piloting an Online, Self-help Intervention for Anxiety

This study pilots a novel, brief, online, self-help training course for anxiety management, aimed at adults experiencing moderate to moderately-severe anxiety.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study is a pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing a brief, online self-help, anxiety management training course ('STAGE') with a wait-list control. A battery of self-report measures will be administered online at baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 3) and at follow-up (week 5).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kent
      • Tunbridge Wells, Kent, United Kingdom, TN1 2YG
        • Canterbury Christ Church University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • having a score, at baseline, on the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale of between 8 and 15, inclusive;
  • having regular internet access;
  • being based in the UK.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant risk issues in the last year;
  • currently receiving another psychological intervention, whether it be self-help or face-to-face;
  • having recently (within the last six months) completed a psychological intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STAGE course
STAGE is a brief, online, self-help course designed to target anxiety through providing training in perspective broadening and self-distancing.
No Intervention: Wait-list control
The wait-list control group will receive access to the STAGE course after the trial is complete.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline (week 0) at post-intervention (week 3) on the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale.
Time Frame: Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
The Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale is a self-report measure of general anxiety, producing a total score between 0 and 21, with higher scores indicating greater levels of general anxiety.
Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline (week 0) at follow-up (week 5) on the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) scale.
Time Frame: Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
As described above
Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at post-intervention (week 3) on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) is a self-report measure of depression, producing a total score between 0 and 27, with higher scores indicating greater levels of depression.
Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at follow-up (week 5) on the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9).
Time Frame: Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
As described above
Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at post-intervention (week 3) on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS) is a self-report measure of mental wellbeing, producing a total score between 14 and 70, with higher scores indicating greater levels of mental wellbeing.
Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at follow-up (week 5) on the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS).
Time Frame: Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
As described above
Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at post-intervention (week 3) on the Experience Questionnaire (EQ).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
The Experience Questionnaire (EQ) is a self-report measure of decentering, producing a total score between 20 and 100, with higher scores indicating greater levels of decentering.
Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at follow-up (week 5) on the Experience Questionnaire (EQ).
Time Frame: Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
As described above
Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at post-intervention (week 3) on the Putting into Perspective subscale of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ).
Time Frame: Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
The Putting into Perspective subscale of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is a self-report measure of perspective taking, producing a total score between 4 and 20.
Post-intervention (3 weeks after baseline).
Change from baseline (week 0) at follow-up (week 5) on the Putting into Perspective subscale of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ).
Time Frame: Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).
As described above
Follow-up (5 weeks after baseline).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Asuka Boyle, MSc, Canterbury Christ Church University
  • Study Director: Emma Travers-Hill, PhD, PsychD, Kent and Medway Nhs and Social Care Partnership Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AsukaBoyleMRP2017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on STAGE training for anxiety

3
Subscribe