Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (ALBA)

January 14, 2021 updated by: Asst. professor Tesfaye Hordofa Leta (Nurse, Postdoc fellow), The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement in Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Register-based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial (Acronym: ALBA Trial)

Introduction: The current evidence on the efficacy of Antibiotic Loaded Bone Cement (ALBC) in reducing the risk of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) after primary joint reconstruction is insufficient. In several European countries, the use of ALBC is routine practice unlike in the US where ALBC use is not approved in low-risk patients. It has been claimed that the antibiotic in ALBC increase the risk of aseptic loosening, risk of systemic toxicity, allergic reaction, and bacterial resistance. Therefore we designed a double-blinded (patients and data analysts) pragmatic multicenter register-based randomized controlled non-inferiority trial to investigate the effects of ALBC compared to plain bone cement in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods and analysis: A minimum of 9,172 patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA will be recruited and equally randomized into the ALBC group and the plain bone cement group. This trial will be conducted in Norwegian hospitals that routinely perform cemented primary TKA. . The primary outcome will be risk of revision surgery due to PJI at 1-year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes will be:

  • risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up;
  • patient related outcome measures (PROMs) like function, pain, satisfaction, and health-related quality of life at 1-, 6-, and 10-years of follow-up;
  • risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions at 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years of follow-up; and
  • cost-effectiveness of routine ALBC vs plain bone cement use in primary TKA. We will use 1:1 randomization with random permuted blocks and stratify by participating hospitals to randomize patients to receive ALBC or plain bone cement. Inclusion, randomization, and follow-up will be through the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Ethics and dissemination: The trial has been approved by the Western Norway Regional Committees on Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK-Vest) (reference number: 2019/751/REK vest) dated: 21.06.2019. The trial results will be reported following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Extension (CONSORT Extension) reporting guideline 2010 statement for non-inferiority trials. The trial results will be reported to the public through national and international scientific conferences, participating hospitals, patient organizations, and peer-reviewed journals.

Discussion: If we find that plain bone cement is non-inferior to the ALBC, it will challenge the routine use of ALBC in primary arthroplasty, due to ecological concerns and costs. However, if routine use of ALBC is associated with a reduced risk of PJI and with minor impact on bacterial resistance, PROMs, and costs, the well-established use of prophylactic ALBC in primary arthroplasty will be supported

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

9172

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bergen, Norway
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Orthopeadic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients undergoing full-cemented primary TKA irrespective of the diagnosis leading to TKA

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any history of infection in the knee, a need for fully stabilized or hinged TKA, a history of allergy to the antibiotics used in the cement, inability or not willing to consent for inclusion in NAR or the trial, and participation in other studies that might have pharmacological interaction with this trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Plain bone cement
The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.
Active Comparator: Antibiotic loaded bone cement
The patients undergoing full-cemented primary total knee arthroplasty are allocated to either ALBC or plain bone cement and compare the effectiveness of ALBC use vs pain bone cement bone cement without antibiotic) with respect to revision due to PJI one year after primary TKA surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
risk of revision due to PJI
Time Frame: 1-year follow-up
1-year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
risk of revision due to any reason including aseptic loosening
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
risk of changes in the microbial pattern and resistance profiles of organisms cultured in subsequent revisions
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
1-, 6-, 10-, and 20-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline function (in activity of daily life) on the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baselinein in Visual Analog Sale (the scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible state and 100 indicating the best possible state) for pain.
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Change in mean scores from baseline in EQ-5D-5L for health related quality of life(HRQoL).
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
Mean scores in Visual Analog Sale ( the scores range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the worst possible state and 100 indicating the best possible state) for patient satisfaction.
Time Frame: 1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up
1-, 6-, and 10-years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ove Furnes, MD/PhD, The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Osteoarthritis, Knee

Clinical Trials on ALBC vs plain bone cement

3
Subscribe