Comparison of Two Application Techniques for LET Gel

Comparison of 2 Application Techniques for LET (Lidocaine 4%; Epinephrine 0.1%; Tetracaine 0.5%) Gel Used Prior to Simple Laceration Repair in Children

Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) applied three times for 10 minutes each time vs. once for 30 minutes prior to suturing simple lacerations in children aged 7-17 years.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Randomized single-blinded clinical trial with convenience sampling of the anesthetic efficacy of a single 30-minute application vs three 10-minute applications of Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel (LET) prior to suturing simple lacerations in children aged 7-17 years seen in the Emergency Department.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Orange, California, United States, 92868
        • Children's Hospital of Orange County
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90502
        • Harbor-UCLA Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Simple <= 3cm lacerations requiring suturing (as decided by clinician care providers)
  • Plan to suture with simple interrupted sutures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lacerations involving the hands, feet, genitals, tongue, mucus membranes, nose, ears, or occurring over joints
  • Patients whose primary language was neither English nor Spanish
  • Developmentally delayed or disabled patient such that they were unable to give a pain score
  • Patients requiring procedural sedation or anxiolysis with oral or intranasal midazolam

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Single LET
One (single) application of LET topical gel [Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%)] applied for 30 minutes
Topical anesthetic
Other Names:
  • LET
EXPERIMENTAL: Triple LET
Three applications of LET topical gel, one applied every 10 minutes
Topical anesthetic
Other Names:
  • LET

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale Pain Score
Time Frame: Immediately on placement or attempt at placement of first suture
Pain score self-rated by patient on 100m Visual Analog Pain scale, minimum value 0, maximum value 100, higher scores equal more pain (worse outcome)
Immediately on placement or attempt at placement of first suture

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for Additional Local Anesthetic
Time Frame: At any time during suturing procedure, time frame is duration of procedure, generally 10-20 minutes, less than one hour. Determined by chart review immediately after procedure completion.
Need for additional infiltrated local anesthetic (lidocaine)
At any time during suturing procedure, time frame is duration of procedure, generally 10-20 minutes, less than one hour. Determined by chart review immediately after procedure completion.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelly D Young, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 22, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 12, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 12, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lacerations

Clinical Trials on LET Lidocaine (4%), Epinephrine (0.1%), and Tetracaine (0.5%) topical gel

3
Subscribe