COMMUNIcation and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer (COMMUNICARE)

October 30, 2023 updated by: Gabriele Capurso, IRCCS San Raffaele

COMMUNI.CARE (COMMUNIcation and Patient Engagement at Diagnosis of PAncreatic CAncer): Study Protocol

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in many cases is completely unforeseen by the patient, who often faces a disease that is already at an advanced stage, with poor prognosis. The clinical visit during which the diagnosis is communicated together with the first information regarding the planned treatments is of paramount importance. It is hypothesized that the clarity of such information is able to influence patients's engagement and thus the compliance.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to collect quantitative data on the level of PDAC patient engagement and the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor, and investigate the possible association between these two variables and with the patient's level of compliance.

METHODS: This is a single-center, observational, cross-sectional cohort study focused on patients diagnosed with PDAC, approved by the Ethics Committee of the San Raffaele Hospital. As no preliminary data are available on the association between PDAC patient's understanding rate and their level of engagement and of compliance no power calculation is possible. This is a pilot study, aimed at enrolling at least 45 PDAC patients during a 3 months frame.

CONCLUSION: COMMUNI.CARE will be the first study specifically investigating whether there is a relation between PDAC patients' rate of understanding, their engagement and compliance at time of diagnosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The diagnosis of PDAC in most cases is completely unforeseen for the patient, who faces with the disease already at an advanced stage and without a progressive approach to it. The clinical interview in which the diagnosis and the first information regarding treatment options and prognosis are communicated assumes a strong relevance, since it is an unexpected diagnosis with a poor prognosis.

Doctor-patient communication is an integral part of the care itself and poses the basis for the construction of the therapeutic alliance, an essential condition for compliance of the patient with reference to the treatments proposed by the physician.

Many recent studies claim that a good level of patient engagement is an essential condition for building a solid therapeutic alliance; in this regard, objective measurement scales of the patient engagement level have been developed, and have been demonstrated to be useful for quantifying the patient's involvement within the care process Among them is the Patient Health Engagement Scale (PHE-S®)-Scale, a recently validated assessment scale of simple and non-invasive use, that requires only the administration of a questionnaire to the previously informed patient who gives his consent.

The hypothesis of this study is that the clarity of the communication between the treating physician and the patient, and the level of understanding by the patient of the information conveyed by the doctor, in particular at the time of diagnosis largely influences the construction of a solid therapeutic alliance between the treating physician and PDAC patients and consequently the patient's engagement and compliance in the care process.

Our hypothesis is that the clarity of the communication between the treating physician and the patient and the degree of comprehension by the patient, especially during the first phases of the cure, are associated with the level of engagement and consequently with the compliance of patients with PDAC.

If the present pilot study will support the initial hypothesis, further action to improve the clarity of the clinical communication will be promoted.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy
        • Gabriele Capurso

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patient (<18 years old), Italian mother tongue, enrolled during the visit that takes place at the time of the communication of the pancreatic cancer diagnosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years);
  • Of Italian mother tongue;
  • Have a histologic diagnosis of PDAC obtained during the 4 weeks before the visit
  • The visit is the first visit after completion of diagnostic procedures and is set to communicate the diagnosis and treatment strategies
  • Give full, written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PDAC recurrence after previous diagnosis and treatment
  • Poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pancreatic cancer

Outpatients seen at the Gastroenterology, Pancreatic Surgery and Oncology Clinics of the Pancreas Translational and Clinical Research Centre, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan (Italy) will be considered includable if:

  1. Adult patients (≥18 years);
  2. Of Italian mother tongue;
  3. Have a histologic diagnosis of PDAC obtained during the 4 weeks before the visit
  4. The visit is the first visit after completion of diagnostic procedures and is set to communicate the diagnosis and treatment strategies
  5. Give full, written informed consent

The following exclusion criteria will be applied:

  1. PDAC recurrence after previous diagnosis and treatment
  2. poor performance status (ECOG ≥ 3);
(i) the completion of the scheduled outpatients visit (ii) filling of the PHE-Scale® questionnaire by the patient to investigate the level of engagement and (iii) the completion of a semi-structured interview to assess the rate of understanding of the information received from the doctor.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Engagement Level
Time Frame: 3 months
Patient Health Engagement Scale (PHE-S®)-Scale is a validated quantitative tool to measure engagement.
3 months
Patient's Rate of Understanding
Time Frame: 3 months
a semi-structured interview of about 30 minutes to ask the patient questions concerning the clarity of the communication he had received from the doctor and the type of language used, to record the rate of understanding of the information will be employed to define whether the language used by the treating physician and its clarity for the patient allowed understanding defined as the rate.
3 months
Patient's Compliance
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as rate of therapies received compared to what was proposed and planned by the treating physicians.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gabriele Capurso, IRCCS San Raffaele

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Interview and evaluation of Engagement

3
Subscribe