Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures

May 28, 2024 updated by: Simon Young, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this trial is to compare operating room time between conventional treatment techniques [without Virtual surgical Planning (VSP)] versus treatment with use of Virtual surgical Planning (VSP) in patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient consent
  • Complex mandible fracture (at least two fractures) that require ORIF of at least one fracture. This will exclude condylar fractures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to participate in study
  • Infected mandible fracture
  • Closed reduction treatment of mandible fracture
  • Fractures older than 2-3 weeks at the time of treatment
  • Other concomitant mid-facial bone fractures (ie, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), Lefort fractures)
  • Other etiologies than trauma of the mandibular fracture or pathologic fracture secondary to benign or malignant pathology that may require resection
  • Pregnant patients will NOT be excluded from the study
  • Co-morbidities (auto-immune disease, osteoporosis, titanium or metal allergy, uncontrolled diabetes (A1c greater than 8)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
The control group will include patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) in standard fashion (without virtual surgical planning assistance and occlusal splint)
Experimental: Treatment Group
The treatment group corresponds to patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) utilizing virtual surgical planning via 3D Systems, bite registration and fabrication of occlusal splint via intraoral digital scanner, and mandibular hardware

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Time Taken to Complete an Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
The time taken to complete an Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) [referred to as the "plating time"] was defined as beginning after dissection was complete and fractures were initially reduced, and ending after all fracture sites were fixated with the final screw placed.
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
1 week after ORIF
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
3 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
6 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
1 week after ORIF
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
3 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
6 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
1 week after ORIF
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
3 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
6 weeks after ORIF
Type of Archbars Used in ORIF
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
Archbars are used for fixating jaws during the treatment of mandible fractures. Archbars are anchored onto both jaws (that is, onto the maxillar/upper jaw, and onto the mandibular/lower jaw); therefore, each participant receives 2 arch bars, one for each jaw. Data are reported categorically as the type of arch bar received for a jaw.
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
Number of Participants Whose Occlusal Splint Fit Appropriately
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
Type of Surgical Approach to the Fracture Site
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
The type of surgical approach to the fracture site is reported categorically as either extraoral or intraoral. This is counted based on each fracture approached surgically (a participant may have more than 1 approach if they had more than 1 fracture site).
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
Number of Participants Who Required Intraoperative Surgical Revisions
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
Distance of Maximal Interincisal Opening
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
Maximal interincisal opening is the maximum distance a person can open their mouth between their upper and lower incisors measured in millimeters.
6 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants With Hardware Failure
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks after ORIF
Number of Participants with hardware failure as defined as plate fracture or screw loosening
from baseline to 6 weeks after ORIF

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Timothy Woernley, DDS, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures

Clinical Trials on Control group without use of VSP

Subscribe