- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04283981
Comparison of Operating Room Time Length With the Use of Virtual Surgical Planning Versus Conventional Treatment of Mandible Fractures
May 28, 2024 updated by: Simon Young, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this trial is to compare operating room time between conventional treatment techniques [without Virtual surgical Planning (VSP)] versus treatment with use of Virtual surgical Planning (VSP) in patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
28
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient consent
- Complex mandible fracture (at least two fractures) that require ORIF of at least one fracture. This will exclude condylar fractures
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient refusal to participate in study
- Infected mandible fracture
- Closed reduction treatment of mandible fracture
- Fractures older than 2-3 weeks at the time of treatment
- Other concomitant mid-facial bone fractures (ie, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC), Lefort fractures)
- Other etiologies than trauma of the mandibular fracture or pathologic fracture secondary to benign or malignant pathology that may require resection
- Pregnant patients will NOT be excluded from the study
- Co-morbidities (auto-immune disease, osteoporosis, titanium or metal allergy, uncontrolled diabetes (A1c greater than 8)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control Group
|
The control group will include patients that undergo mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) in standard fashion (without virtual surgical planning assistance and occlusal splint)
|
|
Experimental: Treatment Group
|
The treatment group corresponds to patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction via open reduction internal fixation (intraoral or extraoral approach) utilizing virtual surgical planning via 3D Systems, bite registration and fabrication of occlusal splint via intraoral digital scanner, and mandibular hardware
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The Time Taken to Complete an Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF)
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
The time taken to complete an Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF) [referred to as the "plating time"] was defined as beginning after dissection was complete and fractures were initially reduced, and ending after all fracture sites were fixated with the final screw placed.
|
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
|
1 week after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
|
3 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Malocclusion
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
|
6 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
|
1 week after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
|
3 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Fractures That Are Not Well Aligned
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
|
6 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 1 week after ORIF
|
1 week after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 3 weeks after ORIF
|
3 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Number of Participants With Infections
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
|
6 weeks after ORIF
|
|
|
Type of Archbars Used in ORIF
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
Archbars are used for fixating jaws during the treatment of mandible fractures.
Archbars are anchored onto both jaws (that is, onto the maxillar/upper jaw, and onto the mandibular/lower jaw); therefore, each participant receives 2 arch bars, one for each jaw.
Data are reported categorically as the type of arch bar received for a jaw.
|
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
|
Number of Participants Whose Occlusal Splint Fit Appropriately
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
|
|
Type of Surgical Approach to the Fracture Site
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
The type of surgical approach to the fracture site is reported categorically as either extraoral or intraoral.
This is counted based on each fracture approached surgically (a participant may have more than 1 approach if they had more than 1 fracture site).
|
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
|
Number of Participants Who Required Intraoperative Surgical Revisions
Time Frame: from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
from start of ORIF to end of ORIF (about 2-3 hours)
|
|
|
Distance of Maximal Interincisal Opening
Time Frame: 6 weeks after ORIF
|
Maximal interincisal opening is the maximum distance a person can open their mouth between their upper and lower incisors measured in millimeters.
|
6 weeks after ORIF
|
|
Number of Participants With Hardware Failure
Time Frame: from baseline to 6 weeks after ORIF
|
Number of Participants with hardware failure as defined as plate fracture or screw loosening
|
from baseline to 6 weeks after ORIF
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Timothy Woernley, DDS, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 24, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
November 10, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 21, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
February 25, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 20, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 28, 2024
Last Verified
May 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-DB-19-1074
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mandibular Fractures
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular Fracture | Virtual Plan of Mandibular FractureEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedMandibular FractureEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedMandibular Angle FractureEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityActive, not recruitingMandibular Fracture TreatmentEgypt
-
Suez Canal UniversityRecruitingMandibular Fracture TreatmentEgypt
-
Mohamed abdelsalam Gaber elkhoulyNot yet recruitingMandibular Class Iv Fractures
-
Stryker CraniomaxillofacialCompletedMandible Fracture | Mandibular ReconstructionGermany, United States
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreNot yet recruitingNeurosensory Disturbance | Mandibular Body FracturesPakistan
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedT-prf Versus T-prf and Low-level Laser Stimulation on Bone Healing at Posterior Mandibular FracturesPosterior Mandibular FracturesEgypt
-
Esraa Mosad TawfikNot yet recruitingMandibular Sub-condylar Fracture
Clinical Trials on Control group without use of VSP
-
Orthosensor, Inc.TerminatedOsteoarthritisUnited States
-
Queen's University, BelfastUnknownAcute Lung InjuryUnited Kingdom
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedPolyp of Colon | Colo-rectal Cancer | Adenomatous Polyp of ColonUnited States
-
The Dental Hospital of Zhejiang University School...RecruitingMechanical Failure of Dental Implant NosChina
-
University of Sao PauloTerminated
-
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityCompleted
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...UnknownTooth Loss | Recession, GingivalBrazil
-
Prince of Songkla UniversityCompleted
-
Todd Moyerbrailean DO FACOGTerminated