- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04294368
Targeted Fortification of Donor Breast Milk in Preterm Infants
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Dietary supplement: Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid
- Dietary supplement: Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier
- Dietary supplement: Nestle Microlipid
- Dietary supplement: Medica Nutrition SolCarb
- Other: Analysis with Miris (AB) Human Milk Analyzer
- Dietary supplement: Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid (Targeted Fortification)
- Dietary supplement: Similac Liquid Protein Fortifier (Targeted Fortification)
- Dietary supplement: Nestle Microlipid (Targeted Fortification)
- Dietary supplement: Medica Nutrition SolCarb (Targeted Fortification)
Detailed Description
Breast milk is the best food for premature infants due to its ability to protect infants from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and late onset sepsis. When a premature infant's mother's own milk supply is not enough to provide all the milk that her premature infant needs, donated breast milk is the next best option. One of the downsides of donor breast milk is that it often does not contain as much nutrition for the developing infant compared to the milk of a mother of a premature infant. This means a higher likelihood for poor growth in infant receiving mostly donor breast milk compared to mom's own milk. Due to an inability to easily measure the nutritional content of donor breast milk, standard practice has been to assume that the milk has a certain amount of fat, carbohydrates, and protein. Based on these assumptions, a set amount of additional nutritional fortifier is added to both donor and mom's own breast milk prior to it being given to the infant. Studies show that there is often less nutrition in the donor breast milk to start with than assumed. Technology is now available which uses a small volume sample to measure fat, protein, and carbohydrates in human milk, and hence, calculate the calories in the milk. Using this technology, in this study, the investigators will customize the fortification of donor breast milk by first measuring what is in the milk and then adding any additional fortification that is needed to reach the recommended goals for fat, protein, and carbohydrates. The investigators hypothesize that infants receiving this customized milk, so-called "target" fortified donor breast milk, will have better growth than infants receiving the standard amount of fortification added to their donor breast milk.
The study design involves measurement of macronutrient and calorie content of donor breast milk using a point-of-care human milk analyzer (Miris, AB). The individual macronutrient (protein, fat, and carbohydrate) concentrations will be targeted in the intervention group such that the infant will receive protein of 4 g/kg/day, fat of 6.6 g/kg/day, and carbohydrates of 11.6-13.2 g/kg/day. Fortification will be added in a step-wise fashion daily over a 3-4 day period starting when the infant reaches about 80 ml/kg/day in feeding volume. Fortifiers that may be used in this study include: Abbott Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid, Abbott Liquid Protein, Nestle Microlipid, and Medica Nutrition SolCarb. Participants in the control arm will receive donor milk that is fortified in the standard fashion at this institution; that is, 4 packets of Human Milk Fortifier will be added to 100 ml of donor breast milk. Additional fortification such as liquid protein or microlipid may be added to the donor milk and mom's own milk in response to poor growth for participants in both groups, as is standard of care in this Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Patients in both experimental and control groups will always receive mom's own milk first when it is available. Mom's own milk will not be analyzed and will always be fortified in the standard fashion for both groups. The participants will be studied until they reach 34 weeks corrected gestational age.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jenny Taylor, MD
- Phone Number: 212-305-8500
- Email: jt3073@cumc.columbia.edu
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10032
- Recruiting
- Columbia University Medical Center/ New York - Presbyterian
-
Contact:
- Jenny Taylor, MD
- Phone Number: 212-305-8500
- Email: jt3073@cumc.columbia.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Marianne Garland, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Premature infants born </= 30 weeks gestational age
- Birth Weight </= 1500 grams
Exclusion Criteria:
- Parents do no consent to donor milk
- Confounders for poor growth such as congenital heart disease, GI diagnoses such as gastroschisis and omphalocele, and or major congenital anomalies
- Grade III or IV intraventricular hemorrhage diagnoses prior to randomization
- Small for gestational age (<3% on Fenton Growth Curve)
- Failure to initiate fortified feeds prior to 3 weeks of life
- Diagnosis of necrotizing entercolitis prior to randomization
- Diagnosis of early onset sepsis confirmed with positive culture
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Control
Standard fortification of breast milk
|
The control group will receive mother's breast milk when it is available.
Mother's breast milk will be fortified with 4 packets of Similac Human Milk Fortifier (HMF) per 100 mL.
When mother's breast milk is not available, participants will be fed donor breast milk with 4 packets of HMF.
For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU.
The standard dose is 1 ml per 30 ml of breast milk.
For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU.
The standard dose is 1 ml per 30 ml of breast milk.
For participants in the control group, additional fortification can be added to the milk for patients in this group in response to poor growth, as is standard of care in the NICU.
For participants in both the control and the experimental arms, each batch of donor milk will be analyzed using the Miris Human Milk Analyzer.
Manufacturer recommendations for milk analysis will be strictly followed.
|
Experimental: Experimental
Targeted fortification of breast milk
|
For participants in both the control and the experimental arms, each batch of donor milk will be analyzed using the Miris Human Milk Analyzer.
Manufacturer recommendations for milk analysis will be strictly followed.
The experimental group will receive mother's breast milk when it is available.
Mother's breast milk will be fortified with 4 packets of Similac Human Milk Fortifier (HMF) per 100 mL.
When mother's breast milk is not available, participants will be fed donor breast milk with 4 packets of HMF.
For participants in the experimental group, the investigators will continue to add fortification.
Two packets of HMF per day will be added until goal fortification is reached.
Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base protein content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk.
Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base fat content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk
Participants in the experimental group will receive a dose that will vary depending on the base carbohydrate content in the donor breast milk for each particular batch of donor breast milk
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in weight
Time Frame: Up to 11 weeks
|
Weight change in g/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week
|
Up to 11 weeks
|
Change in length
Time Frame: Up to 11 weeks
|
Length change in cm/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week
|
Up to 11 weeks
|
Head circumference
Time Frame: Up to 11 weeks
|
Head circumference change in cm/kg/day, z-score value, and change in z-score from week-to-week
|
Up to 11 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Total Number of Days of Length of Stay in NICU
Time Frame: Up to 1 year
|
Today number of days in the NICU.
|
Up to 1 year
|
Rate of Mortality
Time Frame: Up to one year
|
Rate of morality during NICU hospitalization.
|
Up to one year
|
Number of Feeding Intolerance Events
Time Frame: Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age
|
The number of feeding intolerance events, defined as 1 or more feeds held.
|
Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age
|
Number of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Events
Time Frame: Up to 1 year of age
|
Number of necrotizing enterocolotis events.
|
Up to 1 year of age
|
Incidence of Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time Frame: Up to 1 year of age
|
Incidence of supplemental oxygen requirement at 36 weeks corrected gestational age.
|
Up to 1 year of age
|
Incidence of Retinopathy of prematurity
Time Frame: Up to 1 year of age
|
Incidence of retinopathy of prematurity
|
Up to 1 year of age
|
Percentage of Feeds with Donor Milk and Mother's Milk
Time Frame: Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age
|
Percent of feeds that are donor milk and mom's own milk.
|
Up to 34 weeks corrected gestational age
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marianne Garland, MD, Columbia University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Montjaux-Regis N, Cristini C, Arnaud C, Glorieux I, Vanpee M, Casper C. Improved growth of preterm infants receiving mother's own raw milk compared with pasteurized donor milk. Acta Paediatr. 2011 Dec;100(12):1548-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02389.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
- Gidrewicz DA, Fenton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the nutrient content of preterm and term breast milk. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Aug 30;14:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-216.
- Horbar JD, Ehrenkranz RA, Badger GJ, Edwards EM, Morrow KA, Soll RF, Buzas JS, Bertino E, Gagliardi L, Bellu R. Weight Growth Velocity and Postnatal Growth Failure in Infants 501 to 1500 Grams: 2000-2013. Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e84-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0129.
- Arslanoglu S, Boquien CY, King C, Lamireau D, Tonetto P, Barnett D, Bertino E, Gaya A, Gebauer C, Grovslien A, Moro GE, Weaver G, Wesolowska AM, Picaud JC. Fortification of Human Milk for Preterm Infants: Update and Recommendations of the European Milk Bank Association (EMBA) Working Group on Human Milk Fortification. Front Pediatr. 2019 Mar 22;7:76. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00076. eCollection 2019.
- Billard H, Simon L, Desnots E, Sochard A, Boscher C, Riaublanc A, Alexandre-Gouabau MC, Boquien CY. Calibration Adjustment of the Mid-infrared Analyzer for an Accurate Determination of the Macronutrient Composition of Human Milk. J Hum Lact. 2016 Aug;32(3):NP19-27. doi: 10.1177/0890334415588513. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
- Fusch C. Avoiding Postnatal Growth Retardation by Individualized Fortification of Breast Milk: Implications for Somatic and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes. Breastfeed Med. 2019 Apr;14(S1):S15-S17. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2019.0031. No abstract available.
- Fusch G, Rochow N, Choi A, Fusch S, Poeschl S, Ubah AO, Lee SY, Raja P, Fusch C. Rapid measurement of macronutrients in breast milk: How reliable are infrared milk analyzers? Clin Nutr. 2015 Jun;34(3):465-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.05.005. Epub 2014 May 17.
- John A, Sun R, Maillart L, Schaefer A, Hamilton Spence E, Perrin MT. Macronutrient variability in human milk from donors to a milk bank: Implications for feeding preterm infants. PLoS One. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):e0210610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210610. eCollection 2019.
- Morlacchi L, Mallardi D, Gianni ML, Roggero P, Amato O, Piemontese P, Consonni D, Mosca F. Is targeted fortification of human breast milk an optimal nutrition strategy for preterm infants? An interventional study. J Transl Med. 2016 Jul 1;14(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12967-016-0957-y.
- O'Connor DL, Ewaschuk JB, Unger S. Human milk pasteurization: benefits and risks. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2015 May;18(3):269-75. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000160.
- Quan M, Wang D, Gou L, Sun Z, Ma J, Zhang L, Wang C, Schibler K, Li Z. Individualized Human Milk Fortification to Improve the Growth of Hospitalized Preterm Infants. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020 Aug;35(4):680-688. doi: 10.1002/ncp.10366. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
- Rochow N, Fusch G, Choi A, Chessell L, Elliott L, McDonald K, Kuiper E, Purcha M, Turner S, Chan E, Xia MY, Fusch C. Target fortification of breast milk with fat, protein, and carbohydrates for preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):1001-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.052. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
- Zhu M, Yang Z, Ren Y, Duan Y, Gao H, Liu B, Ye W, Wang J, Yin S. Comparison of macronutrient contents in human milk measured using mid-infrared human milk analyser in a field study vs. chemical reference methods. Matern Child Nutr. 2017 Jan;13(1):10.1111/mcn.12248. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12248. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AAAS6625
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Growth Failure
-
Northwell HealthRecruitingGrowth | Growth Disorders | Growth Failure | Growth Hormone TreatmentUnited States
-
Tufts UniversityHelen Keller International; Purdue University; Patan Academy of Health Sciences; Government of Nepal and other collaboratorsCompletedBirth Weight | Stunting | Birth Length | Linear Growth Failure | Height for Age
-
IpsenCompletedGrowth Disorders | Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 DeficiencyUnited States
-
EMD SeronoCompletedGrowth Hormone Deficiency | Growth FailureGermany
-
Danone Specialized Nutrition IndonesiaLMU Klinikum; Hasanuddin University; RIKENActive, not recruitingGrowth FailureIndonesia
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterActive, not recruitingGrowth Disorders | Growth Failure | PrematurityUnited States
-
Soroka University Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
Danone Specialized Nutrition (M) Sdn BhdUniversiti Putra MalaysiaRecruiting
-
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore...CompletedPostnatal Growth Failure of Preterm Infants | Human Milk Fortification
Clinical Trials on Similac Human Milk Fortifier Extensively Hydrolyzed Protein Concentrated Liquid
-
St. Louis UniversityCompletedPremature Birth of Newborn | Human MilkUnited States
-
University of OklahomaCompletedInfant, Very Low Birth WeightUnited States
-
NEOCOSURUnknown
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityRecruiting
-
Loma Linda UniversityRecruitingPremature Birth | Postnatal Growth Restriction | Breastmilk CollectionUnited States
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenCompleted
-
Federico II UniversityRecruitingCow's Milk Allergy | AllergyItaly
-
Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)CompletedTo Compare the Metabolic Effects of Different Infant Milks