Evaluation of the "Pupillary Pain Index" in Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest (CAPPI)

May 21, 2021 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Evaluation of the Pupillary Dilatation Reflex With the "Pupillary Pain Index" in Neurological Prognosis After Cardiac Arrest

Two-thirds of patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit after a cardiac arrest die in the context of treatment withdrawal after a multimodal evaluation that determines an unfavorable neurological outcome.

This study will evaluate the Pupillary Pain Index (PPI) in the neurological prognosis after cardiac arrest. The PPI is determined by recording of pupillary dilatation with a videopupillometer after a calibrated and incremented nociceptive stimulus on a cutaneous metamere.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Cardiorespiratory arrest is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. The direct consequence of a cardio-circulatory arrest is the absence of blood flow allowing oxygenation of the organs and consequently formation of ischemic lesions. Anoxic cerebral lesions are common in the aftermath of a cardiac arrest and often lead to the death of patients when active therapies are stopped after a multimodal prognostication that indicates that a poor outcome is very likely.

It is of paramount importance to optimize the sensitivity of the prognostication strategy in detecting good neurological outcome. A multimodal approach to the prognostic assessment is essential, and must include at least clinical examination, electrophysiology exploration (electroencephalography and/or evoked potentials) and biomarker analysis.

Although the most reliable predictors did not give false positives in most studies, none of them, considered individually, can establish an unfavorable prognosis with an absolute degree of certitude. For these reasons it is interesting to evaluate new prognostication tools.

The videopupillometry allows precise, reproducible and repeated measurement of changes in pupil diameter in response to a painful or a luminous stimulus. Pupillary pain reflex analysis is usually used to assess the degree of analgesia in a non-communicative patient during general anesthesia and neuromuscular blockade. The PPI score is determined at the bedside by recording pupillary dilatation after a calibrated and incremented nociceptive stimulus (electrical current between 5 and 60mA) applied to a skin metamere with two electrodes.

Automated pupillometry measurement has been recently developed to help support prognostication, with a quantitative pupillary light reflex measurement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the Pupillary Pain Index in the neurological prognosis after a cardiac arrest by correlating the PPI at 48h from the patient's arrival to the CPC score at 3 months.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients remaining comatose after cardiac arrest

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to the ICU after cardiac arrest
  • Age > 18 years
  • Presenting a Glasgow score of <8 at admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Ocular pathology making pupillometry impossible.
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cardiac Arrest group
Patients remaining comatose after a cardiac arrest
Measurement of PPI with a pupillometer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Score Cerebral Performance Category (CPC)
Time Frame: 3 months
Good outcome defined as CPC 1-2, poor outcome defined as CPC 3-5
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characteristics of electroencephalography pattern
Time Frame: Day 2, day 3, day 5, day 7
Classification of Synek, type of pattern (Very malignant, malignant or benign)
Day 2, day 3, day 5, day 7
Biomarkers
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours
Value of seric Neuron Specific Enolase
24 hours, 48 hours
Glasgow motor score
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, day 5, day 7
Motor response component of the Glasgow Coma Scale, ranging from 1 (no response) to 6 (normal response)
24 hours, 48 hours, day 5, day 7
ICU parameters
Time Frame: Day 14
Ventilator days, Length of stay
Day 14
Evoked Potentials
Time Frame: Day 14
Presence or absence of the N20 component of the evoked potentials
Day 14
Neurological pupil index
Time Frame: Day 2, day 3
standardized evaluation of pupil reactivity ranging from 0 (sluggish or abnormal pupils) to 5 (normally reactive pupils)
Day 2, day 3
Diameter of the pupil
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
In millimeters (pupillometry measure)
24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Percentage of pupil dilatation
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Pupillometry measure
24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Latency of pupil dilatation
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
In milliseconds (pupillometry measure)
24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
Velocity of pupil dilatation
Time Frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours
In millimeters per second (pupillometry measure)
24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthieu Koszutski, Dr, Nancy Teaching Hospital, CHU de Nancy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2020

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 24, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrest

Clinical Trials on Pupillary pain index (PPI)

3
Subscribe