The Energy Conservation Education Intervention

April 23, 2020 updated by: Sita Sharma, Queensland University of Technology

The Energy Conservation Education Intervention For People With End-stage Kidney Disease Receiving Haemodialysis (EVEREST)

Fatigue is the most common symptom reported by 70 - 85 % of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) receiving haemodialysis (HD). Educational interventions involving energy conservation strategies are helpful in reducing fatigue. However, the effectiveness of energy conservation has not been previously studied in people with ESKD receiving HD. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of energy conservation education intervention for people with end-stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis (EVEREST) in Nepal.

Symptom Management Theory (SMT) will guide this study. A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial (pCRT) will be conducted in one dialysis centre in Nepal. People on HD who meet the eligibility criteria will be invited to participate. The primary outcome is fatigue severity and the secondary outcome are other renal symptoms, occupational performance and health-related quality of life. Intention to treat analysis will occur and will include a change in the primary and secondary outcome. The study will provide evidence about the feasibility and effectiveness of EVEREST for symptom management.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

126

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants diagnosed with ESKD and undergoing haemodialysis for ≥ 3 months, aged 18 years and above, able to speak and understand Nepali language and willing to participate will be included in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants who are in the early stage of CKD or not dependent on HD, those acutely ill, diagnosed with cognitive impairment and those who are not willing to participate will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Participant of the cluster randomised to the intervention group will receive both the usual care from their healthcare providers and EVEREST delivered by the researcher who is a nurse.
The total program consisting of three educational sessions (at Week -1, week -3 and week -5) and one booster session (week -10) over a period of 12 weeks. Participants will receive individual, face to face education during their regular HD session. Education will be provided over 30-45 minutes for the first session, 30 minutes in the next two sessions and 30-45 minutes for the booster session. The lead researcher, who is a nurse, will deliver the entire intervention to avoid information bias. The simple language will be used, and emphasis will be given on the objectives of each session.
No Intervention: Control
Participants of the cluster randomised to the control group will receive usual care (standard care with no formalised, structured or tailored interventional to reduce symptom/s) from their healthcare providers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4
Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) will be used to assess the severity, frequency, interference associated with fatigue and daily pattern of fatigue. The scale consists of 14 items rated on the 11-point items.
Baseline and week 4
Changes in Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8
The scale consists of 14 items rated on the 11-point items.
Baseline and week 8
Changes in Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The scale consists of 14 items rated on the 11-point items.
Baseline and week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Other renal symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Other renal symptoms will be measured using the renal version of the IPOS (IPOS-Renal). It is a short 11-item measure, combining the most common symptoms experienced by renal patients and additional items from IPOS on concerns beyond symptoms, such as information needs, practice issues, family anxiety during the past three days. Ten questions, including 23 subitems, covers physical and psychological symptoms, carer anxiety and practical issues with optional items for any other concern. Each item is scored using a five-point Likert scale for severity and total score reflect symptom burden.
Baseline and Week 12
Occupational Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) is a valid and reliable instrument that measures the occupational performance. The COPM is designed to identify changes in the individual's personal perceptions of occupational performance over a period of time. Individual rates their performance within the area of self-care, productivity and leisure and satisfaction with their performance. Both scales range from 1-10, with higher values indicating better performance and greater satisfaction.
Baseline and week 12
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Health-related quality of life will be measured using the SF-36 which is the 36-items self-administered survey of a patient's health. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36 represented by the physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS). For each sub-scale, items are scored using a Likert scale, summed and transformed on to a scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health)
Baseline and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

3
Subscribe