Pilot Study on Digitally Supported Home Exercises for the Management of Unspecific Low Back Pain.

January 4, 2021 updated by: University of Zurich
The overall purpose of the study is to investigate effect of Digitally Supported Home Exercises (DSHE) in different groups for which digitally supported interventions could be beneficial. Balance is altered in individuals with low back pain and requires intervention Thus, the investigators will focus on the effect of DSHE to improve postural balance.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The investigators want to investigate whether a digitally supported exercise program can improve the balance of people with non-specific lower back pain. During the exercise program, a computer game at home is controlled with the help of sensors attached to the body. Second aim is to record the daily activities of the participants and compare them with the back pain.

The 120 participants in this study will be divided into four groups (A, B, C and D). In groups A and B 20 patients are included who are in treatment for chronic back pain and receive Medical Training Therapy (MTT). For groups C and D the investigators will invite each 40 participants who have back pain but are not in treatment for their back pain. Only participants in groups A and C receive the digitally supported home exercise program. Who gets the training program is randomized using stratified block randomization.

The balance of all participants is measured four times. Between the 2nd and 3rd measurement the digitally supported exercise program is carried out. Between the 3rd and 4th assessement, participants in group A and C can exercise as much as they wish. The person who carries out the balance tests will not be informed which participant is in which group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • ZH
      • Zurich, ZH, Switzerland, 8091
        • University Hospital Zurich, Directorate of Research and Education, Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria Group A and B

  • Patients with chronic unspecific low back pain
  • Patients of the Medical Training Therapy (MTT)
  • Adult male and female participant's (≥18 years)
  • Informed consent as documented by signature

Inclusion Criteria Group C and D

  • Participant reports unspecific low back pain
  • Receiving no therapy nor medical treatment for the last 6 months
  • Adult male and female participant's (≥18 years)
  • Informed consent as documented by signature

Exclusion criteria All Groups

  • Patients with specific causes for low back pain
  • Radicular syndrome
  • Unable to participate currently in the program due to pain
  • Pregnancy
  • Medication effecting postural balance
  • Uncorrected heavy visual impairment
  • Allergy to adhesive tape
  • Unable to understand and communicate in German or English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients exercise
Low back pain patients Next to basic medical physical training therapy group A receive a home exercising programme which involves 10 exercises for 2 minutes each with the Valedo training system.
The training will comprise of 9 sessions (3 weekly) Each of the training sessions will last 20 minutes. This will result in a cumulative total intervention exercise time of 180 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Valedo home
No Intervention: Patients control
Low back pain patients Group B will receive basic medical physical training therapy
Experimental: Non-patients exercise
non-patients Groups C will receive a home exercising programme which involves 10 exercises for 2 minutes each with the Valedo training system.
The training will comprise of 9 sessions (3 weekly) Each of the training sessions will last 20 minutes. This will result in a cumulative total intervention exercise time of 180 minutes.
Other Names:
  • Valedo home
No Intervention: Non-patients control
non-patients Group D will receive no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postural Balance
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest2)
Change of postural sway in anterior- posterior direction. Larger sway indicates worse balance. During each visit, 4 assessment repetitions of each 120 seconds are performed.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Motor Control
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Lumbar spine and hip angles during task performance. Larger lumbar spine angles describe worse performance. Performance is assessed during a box lifting task and a waiter's bow task. At each assessment visit 5 repetitions of each task are performed.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Low back pain intensity
Time Frame: At balseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain
At balseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Disability
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 ( posttest 2)
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is used to assess disability. Scores range from 0 to 24, with a value of 24 indicating higher disability
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 ( posttest 2)
Health quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
The short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WOOQOL-BREF) is used to assess quality of Life. The scale has 4 subscales (raw scores range from 7 to 35, 6 to 30, 3 to 15 and 8 to 38). Larger values describe the better quality of life.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Fear of movement
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
The short version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) Questionnaire is used to assess fear of movement. The TSK-11 scores range from 11 to 44, with higher scores describing higher fear of movement.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Fear of specific movements
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Ratings of six movements (forward bending, backward bending, sideways bending, rotating, lifting a box, stretching upward) on each how painful or harmful a movement is and how careful a person is when executing the movement. Ratings range from 0 to 100. Large numbers indicate higher painfulness, fearfulness or caution when executing each movement.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale (SES-6) Questionnaire. The mean scores are interpreted and are between 1 and 10. Higher values are the better outcome.
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jaap Swanenburg, PhD, University of Zurich

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BASEC-Nr: 2018-02132

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Publication

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Digitally supported home exercises

3
Subscribe