- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04364243
Pilot Study on Digitally Supported Home Exercises for the Management of Unspecific Low Back Pain.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The investigators want to investigate whether a digitally supported exercise program can improve the balance of people with non-specific lower back pain. During the exercise program, a computer game at home is controlled with the help of sensors attached to the body. Second aim is to record the daily activities of the participants and compare them with the back pain.
The 120 participants in this study will be divided into four groups (A, B, C and D). In groups A and B 20 patients are included who are in treatment for chronic back pain and receive Medical Training Therapy (MTT). For groups C and D the investigators will invite each 40 participants who have back pain but are not in treatment for their back pain. Only participants in groups A and C receive the digitally supported home exercise program. Who gets the training program is randomized using stratified block randomization.
The balance of all participants is measured four times. Between the 2nd and 3rd measurement the digitally supported exercise program is carried out. Between the 3rd and 4th assessement, participants in group A and C can exercise as much as they wish. The person who carries out the balance tests will not be informed which participant is in which group.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
ZH
-
Zurich, ZH, Switzerland, 8091
- University Hospital Zurich, Directorate of Research and Education, Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria Group A and B
- Patients with chronic unspecific low back pain
- Patients of the Medical Training Therapy (MTT)
- Adult male and female participant's (≥18 years)
- Informed consent as documented by signature
Inclusion Criteria Group C and D
- Participant reports unspecific low back pain
- Receiving no therapy nor medical treatment for the last 6 months
- Adult male and female participant's (≥18 years)
- Informed consent as documented by signature
Exclusion criteria All Groups
- Patients with specific causes for low back pain
- Radicular syndrome
- Unable to participate currently in the program due to pain
- Pregnancy
- Medication effecting postural balance
- Uncorrected heavy visual impairment
- Allergy to adhesive tape
- Unable to understand and communicate in German or English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Patients exercise
Low back pain patients Next to basic medical physical training therapy group A receive a home exercising programme which involves 10 exercises for 2 minutes each with the Valedo training system.
|
The training will comprise of 9 sessions (3 weekly) Each of the training sessions will last 20 minutes.
This will result in a cumulative total intervention exercise time of 180 minutes.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Patients control
Low back pain patients Group B will receive basic medical physical training therapy
|
|
Experimental: Non-patients exercise
non-patients Groups C will receive a home exercising programme which involves 10 exercises for 2 minutes each with the Valedo training system.
|
The training will comprise of 9 sessions (3 weekly) Each of the training sessions will last 20 minutes.
This will result in a cumulative total intervention exercise time of 180 minutes.
Other Names:
|
No Intervention: Non-patients control
non-patients Group D will receive no intervention
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Postural Balance
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest2)
|
Change of postural sway in anterior- posterior direction.
Larger sway indicates worse balance.
During each visit, 4 assessment repetitions of each 120 seconds are performed.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest2)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Motor Control
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Lumbar spine and hip angles during task performance.
Larger lumbar spine angles describe worse performance.
Performance is assessed during a box lifting task and a waiter's bow task.
At each assessment visit 5 repetitions of each task are performed.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Low back pain intensity
Time Frame: At balseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Numeric rating scale (0-10), 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain
|
At balseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Disability
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 ( posttest 2)
|
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is used to assess disability.
Scores range from 0 to 24, with a value of 24 indicating higher disability
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 ( posttest 2)
|
Health quality of life
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
The short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire (WOOQOL-BREF) is used to assess quality of Life.
The scale has 4 subscales (raw scores range from 7 to 35, 6 to 30, 3 to 15 and 8 to 38).
Larger values describe the better quality of life.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Fear of movement
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
The short version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) Questionnaire is used to assess fear of movement.
The TSK-11 scores range from 11 to 44, with higher scores describing higher fear of movement.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Fear of specific movements
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Ratings of six movements (forward bending, backward bending, sideways bending, rotating, lifting a box, stretching upward) on each how painful or harmful a movement is and how careful a person is when executing the movement.
Ratings range from 0 to 100.
Large numbers indicate higher painfulness, fearfulness or caution when executing each movement.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Self-efficacy for managing chronic diseases
Time Frame: At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease 6-item scale (SES-6) Questionnaire.
The mean scores are interpreted and are between 1 and 10.
Higher values are the better outcome.
|
At baseline (pretest 1), 3 weeks after pretest 1 (pretest 2), 3 weeks after pretest 2 (posttest 1), 6 weeks after posttest 1 (posttest 2)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jaap Swanenburg, PhD, University of Zurich
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BASEC-Nr: 2018-02132
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de...CompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, Postural | Lower Back Pain Chronic | Low Back Pain, Posterior CompartmentBrazil
-
University School of Physical Education in WroclawCompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Low Back Pain, PosturalPoland
-
Texas Woman's UniversityTexas Physical Therapy AssociationCompletedLow Back Pain | Chronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
University of ParmaKing's College London; Helmholtz Zentrum München; GENOS; Ip Research Consulting... and other collaboratorsUnknownChronic Low Back Pain | Acute Low Back PainUnited States, Australia, Belgium, Croatia, Italy, United Kingdom
-
Ache Laboratorios Farmaceuticos S.A.Unknown
-
Palmer College of ChiropracticDepartment of Health and Human ServicesCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Subacute Low Back PainUnited States
-
Universität Duisburg-EssenSiemens-BetriebskrankenkasseCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChronic Low Back Pain | Recurrent Low Back Pain | Persistent Low Back PainSweden
-
Apsen Farmaceutica S.A.CompletedLow Back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Acute Low Back PainBrazil
Clinical Trials on Digitally supported home exercises
-
Region StockholmKarolinska InstitutetCompleted
-
Hasselt UniversityJessa HospitalUnknown
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries | Paraparesis | ParaplegiaUnited States
-
Inonu UniversityBurcu TaluEnrolling by invitation
-
Firat UniversityRecruiting
-
Haukeland University HospitalUniversity of Bergen; Municipality of Bergen, Norway; Kavli Research Centre for...Completed
-
Cairo UniversityPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedHome Based Exercises With and Without Posture and Ergonomics Training Among Students During COVID-19Musculoskeletal PainPakistan
-
Federal University of Health Science of Porto AlegreCompleted
-
Bozyaka Training and Research HospitalCompletedCommunity-dwelling Older Adults