Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Deficient Ridges

May 5, 2020 updated by: Dr R Viswa Chandra, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences

Zirconia Vs Titanium Implants in Horizontally Deficient Ridges - A Clinical and Radiographic Outcome-Based Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate clinically and radiographically soft tissue around single-implant crowns and peri-implant bone resorption respectively by using zirconia implants or titanium implants in horizontally deficient partially edentulous ridges.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Experimental: Main treatment group Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.

Active Comparator: Control group Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 509002
        • Recruiting
        • SVS Institute of Dental Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 44 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Based on the classification of alveolar ridge width given by Tolstunov, subjects with

  • partially edentulous (2/3 teeth missing)
  • systemically healthy subjects within the age group of 25-44 years
  • Class III ridges characterized by moderate i.e., 4-6mm of alveolar ridge width will be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients

    -. Subjects who underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy and with

  • Habit of smoking, tobacco and alcohol abuse
  • Subjects with active periodontal disease to residual dentition and lack of oral hygiene will be excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Main treatment group
Zirconia implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in main treatment group.
Following standard surgical protocol, Zirconia implant will be placed in horizontally deficient ridge.
Other Names:
  • Experimental group
Active Comparator: Control group
Titanium implants will be placed in a prosthetically guided position in horizontally deficient ridges in control group.
Following standard surgical protocol, Titanium implant will be placed in horizontally deficient ridge.
Other Names:
  • Control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of the soft tissue around single implant crowns
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Pink Esthetic Score (0-2; increasing scores means improvement in clinical outcomes) is used to evaluate the soft tissue around single implant crowns that might change over time at 3 months and 6 months.
Baseline to 6 months
Peri-implant bone resorption
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
measured in terms of vertical bone levels present mesial and distal to implant which will be measured by comparing CBCT
Baseline to 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant survival rate
Time Frame: Baseline to 6 months
Implant survival rate before and after prosthetic loading based on Criteria: A) Persistent pain or dysesthesia B) Peri-implant infection with suppuration C) Absence of mobility D) Absence of continuous peri-implant radiolucency, but with peri-implant bone resorption assessed using dichotomous scale.
Baseline to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Periodontitis

Clinical Trials on Zirconia implant

3
Subscribe