Fermented Food-Supplemented Diet in Ulcerative Colitis

May 16, 2023 updated by: Sidhartha Ranjit Sinha, Stanford University

Effects of a Fermented Food-Supplemented on Patients With Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this study is to see how a diet that supplements fermented foods effects inflammation and quality of life in patients with mild to moderate Ulcerative Colitis (UC). There is a paucity of research and an enormous need for better understanding of diet and intestinal inflammation. Fermented food have been shown to positively influence inflammatory cytokines and intestinal microbial diversity in healthy volunteers.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent
  • Male or female subjects, ≥18 years of age
  • Confirmed diagnosis of UC
  • Symptomatic disease defined as partial Mayo Score 2 to 7 (inclusive)
  • Elevated fecal calprotectin

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, nursing or expect to be pregnant
  • Intolerance to fermented food
  • Individuals with a body mass index (BMI) lower than 18
  • Individuals diagnosed with a serious medical condition (unless approved in writing by a physician)
  • Individuals who have been severely weakened by a disease or medical procedure
  • Individuals with more than mild-moderate cardiovascular disease or life-threatening cancer (as determined by patient's physician) unless approved by a physician
  • Individuals with history of severe cardiac disease (particularly uncompensated congestive heart failure NYHA grade 2 or more or LVEF < 40%)
  • History of relevant intestinal surgery such as total or hemi-colectomy, proctocolectomy, stoma.

Complications of disease such as extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are not automatically considered exclusion criteria. Appropriate medical treatment for UC and/or EIMs will not be withheld.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fermented Food-Supplemented Diet
Patients in this arm will supplement their regular diet by an increasing number of daily servings of fermented food over a period of 10 weeks.
Fermented foods include Kimchi, Sauerkraut, Yoghurt, Kefir and more.
Placebo Comparator: Regular Diet Control Arm
Patients in this arm will continue their regular diet throughout the 10 weeks of study with a maximum of 1 serving of fermented foods per day.
No change in diet.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the clinical disease activity inflammatory marker fecal calprotectin
Time Frame: Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Change in fecal calprotectin
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical response as per partial Mayo score.
Time Frame: Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Clinical response as per partial Mayo score is defined as a decrease from baseline in the partial Mayo Score of >=2 points and either a rectal bleeding subscore of <=1 or a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore of >=1 point (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score consists of the subscores for stool frequency, rectal bleeding, and PGA, omitting endoscopy. Each subscore is graded from 0 to 3 (3 being the worst situation and 0 the best) and the partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score.
Time Frame: Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Clinical remission as per partial Mayo score is defined as a partial Mayo score < 2 points and no individual subscale score >1 point (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Symptomatic remission as per Patient Reported Outcome (PRO2) score
Time Frame: Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Symptomatic remission is defined as as a Mayo stool frequency subscore of 0 or 1 and a Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 (assessed at Data Collection 2). The partial Mayo score is graded from 0 to 9 (0 being the best, 9 being the worst outcome).
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Patient global assessment
Time Frame: Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
"Do you believe you are in remission from your UC symptoms?" (Yes/No)
Assessed at Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Effect of Fermented Food-Supplemented Diet on patient quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Change in Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease questionnaire (SIBDQ) score. The SIBDQ is a quality of life score in UC patients. Response to each of the questions is graded from 1 to 7 (1 being the worst situation and 7 the best).
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Changes in cytokines/chemokines and immune cell profiles
Time Frame: Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Cytokines/chemokines (e.g. TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-gamma, α4β7, CCR1, and CCR9) and immune cell profiles.
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Changes in gut microbiome profiles
Time Frame: Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).
Gut microbiome profiles
Baseline (Data Collection 1) versus Week 10 (Data Collection 2).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sidhartha Sinha, MD, Stanford University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Clinical Trials on Fermented Food-supplemented Diet

3
Subscribe