Self-Control in Bulimia Nervosa

January 21, 2026 updated by: Laura Berner, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

The Influences of Eating and Fasting on Inhibitory Control in Bulimia Nervosa: A Computational Neuroimaging Study

This study examines the influence of acute fasting and eating on self-control in adult females with and without bulimia nervosa (BN). Specifically, the study team is investigating whether differences in behavior and brain activation in response to computer tasks after fasting and after eating a meal could help to explain the symptoms of bulimia nervosa. Data will be collected using questionnaires and a technology called magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Treatment-resistant binge eating and purging may be perpetuated by self-control deficits linked to reduced activation in frontostriatal circuits. To date, however, neurocognitive studies of BN have not assessed the dynamic computational processes underlying inhibition or considered the fact that individuals with BN oscillate between two extremes-under-controlled and over-controlled intake. The proposed study combines neuroimaging with computational modeling to investigate the influences of acute fasting and eating (i.e., metabolic states) on how the brains of women with bulimia nervosa (BN) adaptively prepare for and exert inhibitory control. More specifically, the study has the following main objectives: 1) To determine whether eating and fasting affect adaptive inhibitory control and related frontostriatal activation abnormally in BN; 2) To identify associations of BN severity with state-specific frontostriatal activation and behavior.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Center of Excellence in Eating and Weight Disorders at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Aged 18 to 35 years
  • Currently between 85 and 130% of the expected weight for height
  • Right-handed
  • English-speaking

Additional Inclusion Criteria for Women with Bulimia Nervosa:

- Meet DSM-5 criteria for bulimia nervosa

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medical instability
  • Ongoing medical treatment, medical condition, or psychiatric disorder that may interfere with study variables or participation
  • Shift work
  • Pregnancy, planned pregnancy, or lactation during the study period
  • Allergy to any of the ingredients in or unwillingness to consume the standardized meal or unwillingness to drink water during the fasting period
  • Any contraindication for fMRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Participants with Bulimia Nervosa

Participants are randomly assigned (in even numbers across the two groups) to scan order:

A. These participants are first scanned after 16 hours of fasting on one day, and are next scanned after a standardized meal on a second day.

B. These participants are first scanned after a standardized meal on one day, and are next scanned after 16 hours of fasting on a second day.

16 hours of fasting
fed a standardized meal
neuroimaging with computational modeling
Other Names:
  • MRI
Other: Participants without Bulimia Nervosa

Participants are randomly assigned (in even numbers across the two groups) to scan order:

A. These participants are first scanned after 16 hours of fasting on one day, and are next scanned after a standardized meal on a second day.

B. These participants are first scanned after a standardized meal on one day, and are next scanned after 16 hours of fasting on a second day.

16 hours of fasting
fed a standardized meal
neuroimaging with computational modeling
Other Names:
  • MRI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brain Activation Associated With P(Stop)
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Frontostriatal activation modulated by the predicted need for inhibition (P(stop) (i.e., parametric modulation by p(Stop)), measured as the mean BOLD signal across voxels within the region of interest (ROI). Positive values indicate that neural activation increases as the predicted probability of needing to stop increases (i.e., stronger responses when stopping is predicted to be more likely), whereas negative values indicate that activation decreases as the predicted probability of needing to stop increases (i.e., greater activation when stopping is predicted to be less likely).
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Brain Activation Associated With Prediction Errors (Unsigned)
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Frontostriatal activation modulated by unsigned inhibitory control prediction errors (i.e., parametric modulation by absolute prediction error magnitude), measured as the mean BOLD signal across voxels within the region of interest (ROI). Positive values indicate that neural activation increases with the magnitude of unsigned prediction errors (i.e., stronger responses to more surprising outcomes), whereas negative values indicate that activation decreases as unsigned prediction errors increase (i.e., relative deactivation for more surprising outcomes).
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Brain Activation Associated With Prediction Errors (Signed)
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Frontostriatal activation modulated by signed inhibitory control prediction errors (i.e., parametric modulation by prediction error magnitude), measured as the mean BOLD signal across voxels within the region of interest (ROI). Positive values indicate that neural activation increases as signed prediction errors become more positive (i.e., stronger responses to the surprising need for control), whereas negative values indicate that activation decreases as signed prediction errors become more positive (i.e., stronger responses to the surprising lack of need for control).
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Brain Activation Associated With Successful Inhibition
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Frontostriatal activation associated with successful inhibition , measured as the mean BOLD signal across voxels within the region of interest (ROI) for the contrast of Successful Stop vs. Go trials. Positive values indicate activation associated with successful inhibition.
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stop Signal Reaction Time (SSRT)
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Behavioral performance on the stop signal task, as measured by stop signal reaction time calculated as mean go reaction time minus the stop-signal delay at 50% successful inhibition (SSD₅₀). Higher SSRT means longer latency before failed inhibition.
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Stop Signal Task Inhibition
Time Frame: after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)
Percent correct responses to stop trials on the Stop Signal Task measured by percent of stop trials on which participant successfully withheld a response (vs. failed to withhold response).
after 16 hours of fasting and at 30 minutes after a standardized meal (as least 24 hours apart, but not more than 7 days apart)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura A Berner, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 24 months following peer-reviewed article publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bulimia Nervosa

Clinical Trials on fasting state

Subscribe