Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 (HOT-COVID)

January 10, 2024 updated by: Bodil Steen Rasmussen, Aalborg University Hospital

Handling Oxygenation Targets in COVID-19 Patients With Acute Hypoxaemic Respiratory Failure in the Intensive Care Unit: A Randomised Clinical Trial of a Lower Versus a Higher Oxygenation Target

Patients with COVID-19 and hypoxaemic respiratory failure and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are treated with supplementary oxygen as a standard. However, quality of quantity evidence regarding this practise is low. The aim of the HOT-COVID trial is to evaluate the benefits and harms of two targets of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) in guiding the oxygen therapy in acutely ill adult COVID-19 patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure at ICU admission.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Acutely ill adult COVID-19 patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at risk of life-threatening hypoxia, and are provided supplementary oxygen. Liberal use of supplementary oxygen may increase the number of serious adverse events including death. However, the use of supplementary oxygen therapy, and the optimal oxygenation target in COVID-19 patients have not yet been studied.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends an oxygen therapy during resuscitation of COVID-19 patients to achieve an SpO2 of 94% or more, and 90% or more when stable (non-pregnant patients). The Surviving Sepsis Campaing (SSC) recommends a conservative oxygenation strategy for COVID-19 patients targeting an SpO2 no higher than 96%. Both are based on a systematic review and metanalysis from 2018, investigating the association with mortality and higher versus lower oxygenation strategies in critically ill patients in general.

COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU and treated with positive pressure ventilation fulfil the 2012 Berlin criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Current practice regarding supplementary oxygen therapy in patients with ARDS follows the regimen used in an randomised clinical trial (RCT) from 2000 comparing lower versus higher tidal volumes; i.e. a partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) of 55-80 mmHg (7.3-10.7 kPa) or a peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) of 88-95%.

Of note, a recent published RCT demonstrated a lowered all-cause mortality when targeting a higher oxygenation target (PaO2: 12-14 kPa [90-105 mmHg]) compared to a lower oxygenation target (PaO2: 7.3-9.3 [55-70 mmHg]) in ARDS patients.

The quality and quantity of the current body of evidence regarding oxygenation targets in ARDS is still low.

The aim of the HOT-COVID trial is to evaluate the benefits and harms of two targets of partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) in guiding the oxygen therapy in acutely ill adults COVID-19 patients with hypoxaemic respiratory failure at ICU admission.

The HOT-COVID trial is an amendment to the HOT-ICU trial (NCT03174002)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

726

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Dept. of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet
      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Herlev Hospital
      • Hillerød, Denmark, 3400
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Hillerød Hospital
      • Kolding, Denmark, 6000
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Kolding Hospital
      • Køge, Denmark, 4600
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Køge Hospital
      • Randers, Denmark, 8930
        • Randers Hospital
      • Slagelse, Denmark, 4200
        • Dept. of Intensive Care, Slagelse Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hospital
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • Universitätsspital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acutely admitted to the ICU AND
  • Aged ≥ 18 years AND
  • Receives supplemental oxygen with a flow of at least 10 L per minutes in an open system including high-flow systems OR recieves supplemental oxygen in a closed system including invasive or non-invasive ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)-systems AND
  • Expected to receive supplemental oxygen for at least 24 hours in the ICU AND
  • Having an arterial line for PaO2 monitoring AND
  • Confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (COVID-19) in the time leading to or during current hospital admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cannot be randomised within twelve hours after present ICU admission
  • Chronic mechanical ventilation for any reason
  • Use of home oxygen
  • Previous treatment with bleomycin
  • Organ transplant during current hospital admission
  • Withdrawal from active therapy or brain death deemed imminent
  • Fertile woman (< 50 years of age) with positive urine human gonadotropin (hCG) or plasma-hCG
  • Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Cyanide poisoning
  • Methaemoglobinaemia
  • Paraquat poisoning
  • Any condition expected to involve the use of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO)
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Consent not obtainable according to national regulations
  • Previously randomised into the HOT-COVID trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Low oxygenation target
Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 8 kPa (60 mmHg)
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 8 kPa (60 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
Other Names:
  • Inspired oxygen
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 12 kPa (90 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
Other Names:
  • Inspired oxygen
Active Comparator: High oxygenation target
Partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) 12 kPa (90 mmHg)
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 8 kPa (60 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
Other Names:
  • Inspired oxygen
Oxygen administration to achieve a PaO2 of 12 kPa (90 mmHg) from ICU admission to ICU discharge
Other Names:
  • Inspired oxygen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days alive without organ support
Time Frame: Within 90 days
Days alive and free from mechanical ventilation, circulatory support and renal replacement therapy
Within 90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with one or more serious adverse events
Time Frame: Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days
Serious adverse events are defined as new episode of shock and new episodes of ischaemic events including myocardial or intestinal ischaemia or ischaemic stroke
Until ICU discharge, maximum 90 days
90-days mortality
Time Frame: 90 days
All-cause mortality 90 days after randomisation
90 days
Days alive out of the hospital
Time Frame: Within 90 days
Days alive out of the hospital
Within 90 days
1-year mortality
Time Frame: 1 year
All-cause mortality 1 year after randomisation
1 year
Quality of life assessement using the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L telephone interview
Time Frame: 1 year
EQ-5D-5L 1-year after randomisation
1 year
Cognitive function 1-year after randomisation as assessed using the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) score in selected sites
Time Frame: 1 year
RBANS score 1 year after randomisation at selected sites. The overall RBANS global cognition score, as well as each cognitive domain score, range from 40 to 160 with 100 ± 15 being the age-adjusted mean ± standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better performance.
1 year
Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity
Time Frame: 1 year
Carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO) 1 year after randomisation at selected sites.
1 year
A health economic analysis
Time Frame: 90 days
Cost-effectiveness versus cost-minimisation analyses after completion of the trial, based on the primary outcome.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bodil Steen Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
  • Study Chair: Bodil Steen Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 25, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 8, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AAUH-ICU-03
  • 2017-000632-34 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All original records (incl. consent forms, electronic clinical report forms (eCRFs), and relevant correspondences) will be archived at trial sites for 15 years. The clean electronic trial database file will be delivered to the EudraCT Database and Zenodo data repository (https://zenodo.org/) and maintained for 15 years and anonymised if requested by the authorities.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access Criteria:

Managed by the Steering Committee of the HOT-COVID trial.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Clinical Trials on Oxygen

3
Subscribe