Analgesic Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block Using Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine/Magnesium Sulphate in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

July 16, 2020 updated by: doaa rashwan, Beni-Suef University

Introduction:

Severe postoperative pain following spine surgery is a significant cause of morbidity, extended length of facility stay, and marked opioid usage

The analgesic regime for postoperative pain usually includes paracetamol,NSAIDs and opioids. The opioid epidemic as well as the opioid side effects2 (sedation,respiratory depression, constipation, delayed patient mobilization) has led perioperative physicians to find a way of decreasing the use of opioids. Increasing the use of regional anesthesia is one of the measures to this end. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESP) is a-- popular, interfascial regional technique that was initially described for the management of thoracic neuropathic pain . As the erector spinae fascia extends from the nuchal fascia cranially to the sacrum caudally, local anesthetic agents extend through several levels, and the block can be effective over a large area The ESP block provides effective postoperative analgesic effect for 24 hours in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery Magnesium sulfate (MGS) is a noncompetitive antagonist of N-methyl, D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors with an analgesic effect and is essential for release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic terminals and, similar to calcium channel blockers (CCB), can prevent the entry of calcium into the cell It is suggested that magnesium has many important roles to play in nociception

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block using bupivacaine versus bupivacaine/magnesium sulphate in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine surgery

Inclusion criteria:

orthopedic and neurological patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion [American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. -Contraindications for regional blocks (eg. Patient refusal Infection at the injection site, coagulopathy)
  2. allergic reaction to drugs.
  3. Patients with a history of liver, renal, heart and vascular failure, cardiac conduction disturbance.
  4. opium addiction, any drug or substance abuse and chronic treatment with opium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and calcium channel blockers (CCB).

The patients will be blinded to the study drugs and will be randomly assigned into two equal groups by opaque sealed envelope as follows:

Group (B) (n=15): will receive The bilateral ESP blocks were performed by injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL into each side) into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae

Group B MG (n=15): will receive bilateral ESP blocks performed by each side) and and 500 mg magnesium sulphate into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae for pain management after lumbar spinal surgery injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine(20 mL into each side)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banī Suwayf, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Banī Suwayf, Egypt, 11391

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • orthopedic
  • neurological patients
  • undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusion
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 or 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for regional blocks
  • allergic reaction to drugs.
  • Patients with a history of liver, renal, heart and vascular failure, cardiac conduction disturbance.
  • opium addiction, any drug or substance abuse and chronic treatment with opium, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and calcium channel blockers (CCB).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group (B)
will receive The bilateral ESP blocks before surgery
Group (B) (n=15): will receive The bilateral ESP blocks were performed by injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL into each side) into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae
Active Comparator: Group B MG
will receive bilateral ESP blocks performed by each side) before surgery
Group (B) (n=15): will receive The bilateral ESP blocks were performed by injecting 40 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (20 mL into each side) into the fascial plane between the deep surface of the erector spinae muscle and the transverse processes of the lumbar vertebrae

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to first request of analgesics in hours
Time Frame: change from base line for 24 hours
time to first request of analgesics by the pateint in hours
change from base line for 24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 10, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 10, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMBSUREC/07062020/Abd El Badei

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Group (B)

3
Subscribe